Still 6 more than you though eh?Billy Tully wrote: ↑01 Oct 2022, 13:23Oh yes, I forgot the '6 people agree with me so I'm right' rule.handsofstone wrote: ↑01 Oct 2022, 12:58Your a bellend Billy and in the minority, take the L and move on sonBilly Tully wrote: ↑01 Oct 2022, 11:20
It's perfectly reasonable to ask a man why he sees fit to publically diarise his boxing viewing habits for 135 pages, just as it's perfectly reasonable to say 'Actually, I really enjoy reading posts such as "Howard Eastman vs John Duddy" and "Howard Eastman vs Edison Miranda'." Fair enough, each to his own and all that. But counter puncher having a meltdown over it, and writing an eight paragraph rage-post full of F-words and C-words is not a good look for a grown man. I hope he confines his teenage strops to Boxrec and doesn't behave like that in the real world.
Good to have illustrated the reading level of the people who enjoy this stuff though
Just watched Pazienza/Haugen 3 btw
Was Paz/Haugen 3 a good fight?
Was decent, Pazienza boxed a lot more clever than he usually does, never lunged in like he did first 2 fights and elected to box Haugen off the backfoot and won wide imo