Counter-puncher wrote: ↑22 Aug 2022, 11:26
BroughtonRulesRefuge wrote: ↑21 Aug 2022, 10:50
- Good on AJ tossing the most worthless belt, the Ring Brown Stained Blubber Fury belt, he being the MTK financed Ring Belt holder of 6 years total with 2 defenses, one drug suspension, and the biggest ducks of his era, those of the Wlad rematch and AJ multiple times in favor of the fellow low paying, low hanging fruit of Deyonce.
AJ tossing the trash
so anyway Usyk clearly outboxed Joshua AGAIN
you haven't go the 'his eye got popped in the 9th round or he would have stopped Usyk' (
) line this time
what's your excuse? what's your convoluted 'logic' to show that Usyk actually lost that fight or even if he won, there was a factor that meant he didn't really win?
come on, I'm all ears. explain to us all how Joshua actually won that fight, just like he was going to win the last one before Usyk punched him in the face YET AGAIN.
- Woooooo!!! It's that time of the month at every big fight where you and your ilk in kind gush forth in unabashed leakage.
The history: Usyk gonna be robbed in London, but wait, wait, that didn't happen, so default to a 2 year old quality temper tantrum about scorecards where you didn't get the brand of sugar puffs you wanted.
Oh no, not again! Usyk gonna be robbed by them dirty Arabs, but wait, that didn't, happen, so default to 3 year old quality temper tantrums about scorecards where you didn't get the color of gummy bears you wanted.
No need to go over the first fight as I already laid out existent details then as can be physically shown on the scorecards and the state of Usykenstein's mug that night. I must say though I feel so distinctly honoured to have been quoted twice in your
Rage on the Red Sea moment such that I may just have to build a monument for myself.
In the meantime, poor Judge Feldman who seems to have been an outcast from your and nutcase Teddy 3 year old echo chambers of temper tantrums, at last glance has his scorecards posted on Boxrec for all ages, sexes, and, yessss, even for 3 year olds to see.
From 2nd round to 11th round, 10 rounds total, his scoring is in majority agreement if not in full agreement with the scoring for those 10 rounds, a clear indication of how the competent judges are supposed to view a close fight. No Don King judges to be here with nary a Nevada Manny vs Floyd Commish in sight.
His only outliers are rounds 1 and 12. Round 1 was a typical fluff feeling out with tentative back and forth, typically a round I'd score as even because I score fights to understand the controversy, and the controversy is always the even rounds the fans scream their fighter won. If I were a judge forced to score for one or the other fighter, AJ landed the better blows as Usyk seemed very nervous settling in his new herky jerky style, concentrating on defense. Rd 12 one of the best rounds as the fighters wanted to close strong and they did with a lot of back and forth, but as Usyk had been visibly hurt by body blows all through the fight to took more poundings, I'd definitely give AJ that round though Usyk covered well with a strong finish.
As we've seen this throughout history, the curse of the slugger is to be lambasted when he cannot KO his opponent, whereas when the feather fisted boxer manages to KO his opponent, he's exalted, a strange quirk in the nature of the typical fight fan that lends itself to unceasing controversies, so your echo chamber upholds that dyslexic quirk in boxing.
In short, can't get any closer on the cards than Feldman without being a charter member of your echo chamber. The other judges disagreed with each other 3x in the fight for contrast. Now it ain't up to me to quell besotted when not hungover forum members, usually classed as drunkards, roaring about announcers as proof they don't understand squat from shinola about scoring save to rinse and repeat their next rip roaring riposte ad infinitum
