BoxRec

Posted: **21 Feb 2019, 15:45**

GSP had a great career,a real skilled fighter

Posted: **21 Feb 2019, 17:17**

Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑21 Feb 2019, 15:22 GSP Retired..

Meh.. He was pretty much retired anyhow. One fight in 4 years. He was one of the best, but not one of my favorite.

Posted: **21 Feb 2019, 18:06**

Oiky wrote: ↑21 Feb 2019, 11:10 Great fight,it just screams violence

Too right it does

Posted: **21 Feb 2019, 18:08**

Tinnie wrote: ↑21 Feb 2019, 18:06
Oiky wrote: ↑21 Feb 2019, 11:10 Great fight,it just screams violence
Too right it does

after thinking about it it's definitely better than Tony-khabib

Posted: **21 Feb 2019, 20:01**

Oiky wrote: ↑21 Feb 2019, 18:08
Tinnie wrote: ↑21 Feb 2019, 18:06
Oiky wrote: ↑21 Feb 2019, 11:10 Great fight,it just screams violence
Too right it does
after thinking about it it's definitely better than Tony-khabib

No way

Posted: **21 Feb 2019, 20:11**

Onetimeonly wrote: ↑21 Feb 2019, 20:01
Oiky wrote: ↑21 Feb 2019, 18:08
Tinnie wrote: ↑21 Feb 2019, 18:06
Oiky wrote: ↑21 Feb 2019, 11:10 Great fight,it just screams violence
Too right it does
after thinking about it it's definitely better than Tony-khabib
No way

Depends what you like doesn't it.khabib is a great fighter,and he matches up great with Ferguson, I'd like to see that fight more simply cos Ferguson deserves it & it's about f**king time it happens

But I think in terms of viewing & what goes down ferguson-Holloway makes a deadly fight

Posted: **21 Feb 2019, 20:13**

I think scarface might walk through max. No doubt it would be brutal, just think max has very little chance where khabitch could definitely win.

Posted: **21 Feb 2019, 20:19**

Oiky wrote: ↑21 Feb 2019, 20:11
Onetimeonly wrote: ↑21 Feb 2019, 20:01
Oiky wrote: ↑21 Feb 2019, 18:08
Tinnie wrote: ↑21 Feb 2019, 18:06
Oiky wrote: ↑21 Feb 2019, 11:10 Great fight,it just screams violence
Too right it does
after thinking about it it's definitely better than Tony-khabib
No way
Depends what you like doesn't it.khabib is a great fighter,and he matches up great with Ferguson, I'd like to see that fight more simply cos Ferguson deserves it & it's about f**king time it happens

But I think in terms of viewing & what goes down ferguson-Holloway makes a deadly fight

It does depend. I don't see Khabib-Tony being the epic stand up war a fight with Holloway would make. Many of the purests may very well prefer Khabib. But, most fans overall prefer a great stand war rather than watching the intricacies of one guy whose main focus is jockeying for a position to take the other guy down. I, personally, have been waiting for Khabib-Tony for a very long time. And while Tony deserves it more than anyone, Holloway is still the funner fight.

Posted: **21 Feb 2019, 20:28**

Impractical Poster wrote: ↑21 Feb 2019, 20:19
Oiky wrote: ↑21 Feb 2019, 20:11
Onetimeonly wrote: ↑21 Feb 2019, 20:01
Oiky wrote: ↑21 Feb 2019, 18:08
Tinnie wrote: ↑21 Feb 2019, 18:06
Oiky wrote: ↑21 Feb 2019, 11:10 Great fight,it just screams violence
Too right it does
after thinking about it it's definitely better than Tony-khabib
No way
Depends what you like doesn't it.khabib is a great fighter,and he matches up great with Ferguson, I'd like to see that fight more simply cos Ferguson deserves it & it's about f**king time it happens

But I think in terms of viewing & what goes down ferguson-Holloway makes a deadly fight
It does depend. I don't see Khabib-Tony being the epic stand up war a fight with Holloway would make. Many of the purests may very well prefer Khabib. But, most fans overall prefer a great stand war rather than watching the intricacies of one guy whose main focus is jockeying for a position to take the other guy down. I, personally, have been waiting for Khabib-Tony for a very long time. And while Tony deserves it more than anyone, Holloway is still the funner fight.

That's it mate 100% agree.khabib is a chain wrestler isnt he & would shoot & shoot & shoot til he gets him,I do like & appreciate grappling,it's very affective & can be brutal,but like you say Holloway is the funner fight,they would beat the f**k out of each other and have a great battle

Posted: **21 Feb 2019, 23:08**

You're absolutely correct it would be violent.

Posted: **21 Feb 2019, 23:39**

Khabib/Ferguson needs to happen. I'm sick of all these stupid interim titles. The UFC is slowly wrecking everything that made it more appealing than boxing.

Posted: **22 Feb 2019, 00:04**

Onetimeonly wrote: ↑20 Feb 2019, 18:33 eff khabib. Hard to come up with a more unlikeable character for me. Though cejudo is right there.

McGregor, Rousey, Jones... to name a few. Spoiled UFC company boys 'n girls.

Posted: **22 Feb 2019, 07:29**

jujigatame wrote: ↑21 Feb 2019, 23:39 Khabib/Ferguson needs to happen. I'm sick of all these stupid interim titles. The UFC is slowly wrecking everything that made it more appealing than boxing.

I agree there,they don't want to keep going down the route there going down when it comes to fights & titles

Posted: **22 Feb 2019, 08:45**

Blodhemn wrote: ↑22 Feb 2019, 00:04
Onetimeonly wrote: ↑20 Feb 2019, 18:33 eff khabib. Hard to come up with a more unlikeable character for me. Though cejudo is right there.
McGregor, Rousey, Jones... to name a few. Spoiled UFC company boys 'n girls.

Rousey was definitely up there. I'm pretty indifferent to the other two. Definitely prefer them to khabib.

Posted: **22 Feb 2019, 09:06**

Onetimeonly wrote: ↑22 Feb 2019, 08:45
Blodhemn wrote: ↑22 Feb 2019, 00:04
Onetimeonly wrote: ↑20 Feb 2019, 18:33 eff khabib. Hard to come up with a more unlikeable character for me. Though cejudo is right there.
McGregor, Rousey, Jones... to name a few. Spoiled UFC company boys 'n girls.
Rousey was definitely up there. I'm pretty indifferent to the other two. Definitely prefer them to khabib.

Don't mind mcgregor or jones,get a bit sick of the bulls**t surrounding jones but definitely out of them three rousey is the most aggravating

Posted: **22 Feb 2019, 09:33**

It really annoys me to no end that ESPN stopped showing a full mma schedule since they signed the UFC.

Posted: **22 Feb 2019, 09:46**

Onetimeonly wrote: ↑22 Feb 2019, 09:33 It really annoys me to no end that ESPN stopped showing a full mma schedule since they signed the UFC.

Why would they do that

Posted: **22 Feb 2019, 14:02**

Oiky wrote: ↑22 Feb 2019, 09:46
Onetimeonly wrote: ↑22 Feb 2019, 09:33 It really annoys me to no end that ESPN stopped showing a full mma schedule since they signed the UFC.
Why would they do that

I guess because they paid the UFC a billion and a half. The problem with that is they still cover fights outside the UFC with articles and the UFC televises other orgs on fight pass!

Posted: **22 Feb 2019, 14:41**

Onetimeonly wrote: ↑22 Feb 2019, 14:02
Oiky wrote: ↑22 Feb 2019, 09:46
Onetimeonly wrote: ↑22 Feb 2019, 09:33 It really annoys me to no end that ESPN stopped showing a full mma schedule since they signed the UFC.
Why would they do that
I guess because they paid the UFC a billion and a half. The problem with that is they still cover fights outside the UFC with articles and the UFC televises other orgs on fight pass!

That seems very silly. Not sure how they can call themselves the worldwide leader in sports if they are only showing a UFC schedule on their MMA page... It's pushing people to other outlets.

Just checked the schedule. Yet they still call it an MMA schedule...

Posted: **22 Feb 2019, 14:42**

Impractical Poster wrote: ↑22 Feb 2019, 14:41
Onetimeonly wrote: ↑22 Feb 2019, 14:02
Oiky wrote: ↑22 Feb 2019, 09:46
Onetimeonly wrote: ↑22 Feb 2019, 09:33 It really annoys me to no end that ESPN stopped showing a full mma schedule since they signed the UFC.
Why would they do that
I guess because they paid the UFC a billion and a half. The problem with that is they still cover fights outside the UFC with articles and the UFC televises other orgs on fight pass!
That seems very silly. Not sure how they can call themselves the worldwide leader in sports if they are only showing a UFC schedule on their MMA page... It's pushing people to other outlets.

It's fornicating stupid.

Posted: **22 Feb 2019, 14:46**

The Asleep Lamps wrote: ↑30 Jan 2019, 09:33 Here's my prediction for 2019 -one of the women's champions will go on maternity leave.

Not a champ, but you get partial credit for dern.

Posted: **22 Feb 2019, 14:55**

Onetimeonly wrote: ↑22 Feb 2019, 14:42
Impractical Poster wrote: ↑22 Feb 2019, 14:41
Onetimeonly wrote: ↑22 Feb 2019, 14:02
Oiky wrote: ↑22 Feb 2019, 09:46
Onetimeonly wrote: ↑22 Feb 2019, 09:33 It really annoys me to no end that ESPN stopped showing a full mma schedule since they signed the UFC.
Why would they do that
I guess because they paid the UFC a billion and a half. The problem with that is they still cover fights outside the UFC with articles and the UFC televises other orgs on fight pass!
That seems very silly. Not sure how they can call themselves the worldwide leader in sports if they are only showing a UFC schedule on their MMA page... It's pushing people to other outlets.
It's effing stupid.

I'm so bored that I emailed the concern to them. Told them that to find out when events for other MMA organizations such as Bellator, Rizen, One FC, etc... are, I am being forced to visit other sites to get that info.

I'll bet it's in the contract. Some casual sports fans are already confused with the difference between UFC and MMA. And now calling the schedule an MMA schedule while only showing UFC... wow

I've got way too much time on my hands today.

Posted: **22 Feb 2019, 15:03**

Impractical Poster wrote: ↑22 Feb 2019, 14:55
Onetimeonly wrote: ↑22 Feb 2019, 14:42
Impractical Poster wrote: ↑22 Feb 2019, 14:41
Onetimeonly wrote: ↑22 Feb 2019, 14:02
Oiky wrote: ↑22 Feb 2019, 09:46
Onetimeonly wrote: ↑22 Feb 2019, 09:33 It really annoys me to no end that ESPN stopped showing a full mma schedule since they signed the UFC.
Why would they do that
I guess because they paid the UFC a billion and a half. The problem with that is they still cover fights outside the UFC with articles and the UFC televises other orgs on fight pass!
That seems very silly. Not sure how they can call themselves the worldwide leader in sports if they are only showing a UFC schedule on their MMA page... It's pushing people to other outlets.
It's effing stupid.
I'm so bored that I emailed the concern to them. Told them that to find out when events for other MMA organizations such as Bellator, Rizen, One FC, etc... are, I am being forced to visit other sites to get that info.

I'll bet it's in the contract. Some casual sports fans are already confused with the difference between UFC and MMA. And now calling the schedule an MMA schedule while only showing UFC... wow

I've got way too much time on my hands today.

Let me know what/if they get back to you

All sounds a bit back to front doesn't it

Posted: **22 Feb 2019, 15:05**

Definitely does. Not something I'd expect from ESPN.

Posted: **22 Feb 2019, 15:35**

I wouldlnt expect it either from such a "professional" outfit

BoxRec

MMA

Re: MMA

Re: MMA

Re: MMA

Re: MMA

Re: MMA

Re: MMA

Re: MMA

Re: MMA

Re: MMA

Re: MMA

Re: MMA

Re: MMA

Re: MMA

Re: MMA

Re: MMA

Re: MMA

Re: MMA

Re: MMA

Re: MMA

Re: MMA

Re: MMA

Re: MMA

Re: MMA

Re: MMA

Re: MMA