Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

For RBR threads only
SNG
Super Middleweight
Posts: 4703
Joined: 22 May 2013, 21:02

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by SNG »

Retire Carl.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by Horse »

What the hell was that!
edgey2009
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 192
Joined: 15 Mar 2010, 08:40

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by edgey2009 »

Froch u w***er
deadpan
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3193
Joined: 22 Apr 2004, 04:46

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by deadpan »

Oh and cheating judges as well. Nice.
sendo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 359
Joined: 10 Nov 2007, 17:30

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by sendo »

Two judges had it 76-75. Joke.
Last edited by sendo on 23 Nov 2013, 19:25, edited 1 time in total.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17235
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Groves turned his back. Froch would have stopped him.
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13114
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

HAS FROCH WON????
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by expe »

Howard Foster shouldn't be allowed to referee again for a long time the man is a pudendum of the highest order Froch should have had points off and the stoppage was bullshit. Hearn has paid off the ref and judges 76-75 is a terrible score. Bunch of fornicating wankers absolute bastards
Neil Gee
Super Middleweight
Posts: 4257
Joined: 06 Jul 2013, 15:37

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by Neil Gee »

That was wrong! It feels wrong!
tommo100
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 377
Joined: 06 Dec 2008, 15:59

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by tommo100 »

terrible stoppage,groves was hurt but he wasn't gone
sendo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 359
Joined: 10 Nov 2007, 17:30

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by sendo »

keithmoonhangover wrote:Groves turned his back. Froch would have stopped him.
Bollocks he was slipping shots and firing back. He was hurt and tired, but so was Froch.
80/20
Super Middleweight
Posts: 400
Joined: 23 Oct 2012, 14:54

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by 80/20 »

fornicate this corrupt business after 30 years I am not interested in boxing anymore all the best to you all
SNG
Super Middleweight
Posts: 4703
Joined: 22 May 2013, 21:02

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by SNG »

We've been robbed.
danconnollyeire
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 3576
Joined: 24 May 2012, 10:31

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by danconnollyeire »

He took one lucky shot
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17235
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Groves is still wobbling in the corner.
digzee
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1582
Joined: 11 Nov 2008, 13:49

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by digzee »

expe wrote:Howard Foster shouldn't be allowed to referee again for a long time the man is a pudendum of the highest order Froch should have had points off and the stoppage was bullshit. Hearn has paid off the ref and judges 76-75 is a terrible score. Bunch of effing wankers absolute bastards
100% agree
WayoftheCass
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 719
Joined: 09 Oct 2005, 02:22

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by WayoftheCass »

Oh dear.........Groves all over the place but looks a bit iffy. Defo should be a rematch.
Ketchel
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 868
Joined: 17 Nov 2008, 14:18

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by Ketchel »

Well done Carl! What balls this man has! He was getting on top but Howard WTF? looked like he wanted to fight the amount of times he was jumping in!
lillywhite14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by lillywhite14 »

I ain't even watching and I feel gutted about the finish purely based on your reactions!
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by crusader »

absolutely disgusting stoppage.
SNG
Super Middleweight
Posts: 4703
Joined: 22 May 2013, 21:02

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by SNG »

keithmoonhangover wrote:Groves is still wobbling in the corner.
Give over, everyone has got eyes
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by palooka »

corrupt as fornicate
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by crusader »

sendo wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:Groves turned his back. Froch would have stopped him.
Bollocks he was slipping shots and firing back. He was hurt and tired, but so was Froch.
No kidding. This is boxing and people get hurt once in a while.

Groves looked weary but he was fighting back and both men were very tired.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by expe »

McCloskey said cheated not defeated after the Khan fight, he wasn't, this is a case of that.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by crusader »

SNG wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:Groves is still wobbling in the corner.
Give over, everyone has got eyes
x2
Post Reply