BoxRec

Horse wrote:

Realistic wrote:TOC =
Terry O'conner

So you assumed correctly.

Again for clarity members have been banned for FAR LESS than Horses comments. The guy is a menace and need to be dealt with.

If you didn't hate me then you wouldn't care.

I was drunk and being an arse.

People have not been banned for far less.

Realistic wrote:

Horse wrote:

Realistic wrote:TOC =
Terry O'conner

So you assumed correctly.

Again for clarity members have been banned for FAR LESS than Horses comments. The guy is a menace and need to be dealt with.

If you didn't hate me then you wouldn't care.

I was drunk and being an arse.

People have not been banned for far less.

I do not hate you Horse I despise you. You are a flea on a rats back and gets away with far too much on here.

Boxerbeetle wrote:

Realistic wrote:

Horse wrote:If you didn't hate me then you wouldn't care.

I was drunk and being an arse.

People have not been banned for far less.

I do not hate you Horse I despise you. You are a flea on a rats back and gets away with far too much on here.

Did Horse ever apologise for his disgraceful comments?

Boxerbeetle wrote:

Realistic wrote:

Horse wrote:If you didn't hate me then you wouldn't care.

I was drunk and being an arse.

People have not been banned for far less.

I do not hate you Horse I despise you. You are a flea on a rats back and gets away with far too much on here.

Did Horse ever apologise for his disgraceful comments?

thepocketrocket wrote:

Boxerbeetle wrote:

Realistic wrote: I do not hate you Horse I despise you. You are a flea on a rats back and gets away with far too much on here.

Did Horse ever apologise for his disgraceful comments?

I will ask on behalf of everyone who missed these comments by Horse and can't seem to find them as they were cleaned, what did he say? Horse always says daft stuff...surely it can't have been that bad

Obviously general tone, no need for anyone to get iced for relaying them verbatim

jamesmcdonnell wrote:

thepocketrocket wrote:

Boxerbeetle wrote:
Did Horse ever apologise for his disgraceful comments?

I will ask on behalf of everyone who missed these comments by Horse and can't seem to find them as they were cleaned, what did he say? Horse always says daft stuff...surely it can't have been that bad

Obviously general tone, no need for anyone to get iced for relaying them verbatim

Something along the lines of Gary Lockett being a scumbag or some such. That's what I recall anyway.

Realistic wrote:

jamesmcdonnell wrote:

thepocketrocket wrote:
I will ask on behalf of everyone who missed these comments by Horse and can't seem to find them as they were cleaned, what did he say? Horse always says daft stuff...surely it can't have been that bad

Obviously general tone, no need for anyone to get iced for relaying them verbatim

Something along the lines of Gary Lockett being a scumbag or some such. That's what I recall anyway.

And how GL wanting to get his Fighters Killed!!

thepocketrocket wrote:Not great...'wanting to get his fighter killed' though not sure of context, seems like a good way to bring legal action down on the forum for slander

Horse wrote:

thepocketrocket wrote:Not great...'wanting to get his fighter killed' though not sure of context, seems like a good way to bring legal action down on the forum for slander

I said that I didn't rate him as a fighter or trainer and suggested that he was a danger to his fighters etc multiple times.

And then insulted anyone that had a go at me for saying it.

Obviously I don't actually believe that he wants to get his fighters hurt.

I was a being a tosser and exaggerating, because I wasn't happy with him stopping the fight.

thepocketrocket wrote:That's fair...

In my job before my promotion I was a forum moderator. It is a very hard job striking the balance between discipline and not acting like Rudolf Hoess. I would often use the week long ban option for jerk like behaviour.

Just learn from it and step away from the computer when pissed. The two things don't mix.

magwitch wrote:I don’t think he said Lockett “wanted” to get anyone killed.
The word “spacker” does not sit well with me at all.
Some idiot on this forum who I won’t name in case I swell his ego last week asked “who likes a smartarse?” - “especially a speccy, Chinese one”......

One so called moderator decided to humour him like it was perfectly acceptable to be racist and I am as yet awaiting a response from The Law, who is seemingly otherwise engaged right now.

If discrimination against disability and race is accepted fare, then it doesn’t say a lot for this, nor any other forum.

Realistic wrote:He did say it Mag and I screen shot it; I will not post it on here as I do not want to get the forum into trouble. Drunk or not his true colours shone through and YET again he is allowed to get away with it without reprisal. The longer Moderators allow his behaviour the more he will continue to do it. Even a weeks ban would show he crossed the line with a warning that any reoccurrence would be a life ban. Again I despise the man and he is a flea on a rats back.

TheDarkDestroyer wrote:Interesting to learn Horse gets pissed. I'll add to the profile.

TheDarkDestroyer wrote:

Horse wrote:

TheDarkDestroyer wrote:Interesting to learn Horse gets pissed. I'll add to the profile.

I've got to watch what I say when MI5's finest is around.

magwitch wrote:I don’t think he said Lockett “wanted” to get anyone killed.
The word “spacker” does not sit well with me at all.
Some idiot on this forum who I won’t name in case I swell his ego last week asked “who likes a smartarse?” - “especially a speccy, Chinese one”......

One so called moderator decided to humour him like it was perfectly acceptable to be racist and I am as yet awaiting a response from The Law, who is seemingly otherwise engaged right now.

If discrimination against disability and race is accepted fare, then it doesn’t say a lot for this, nor any other forum.

forcefraser wrote:

magwitch wrote:I don’t think he said Lockett “wanted” to get anyone killed.
The word “spacker” does not sit well with me at all.
Some idiot on this forum who I won’t name in case I swell his ego last week asked “who likes a smartarse?” - “especially a speccy, Chinese one”......

One so called moderator decided to humour him like it was perfectly acceptable to be racist and I am as yet awaiting a response from The Law, who is seemingly otherwise engaged right now.

If discrimination against disability and race is accepted fare, then it doesn’t say a lot for this, nor any other forum.

Why does everything have to be so politically correct these days? What is actually wrong with "especially a speccy Chinese one" It`s not exactly racial abuse is it? What else should you call a Chinese guy?

Or is it the reference to spectacles that bothers you?

dirk2686 wrote:

forcefraser wrote:

magwitch wrote:I don’t think he said Lockett “wanted” to get anyone killed.
The word “spacker” does not sit well with me at all.
Some idiot on this forum who I won’t name in case I swell his ego last week asked “who likes a smartarse?” - “especially a speccy, Chinese one”......

One so called moderator decided to humour him like it was perfectly acceptable to be racist and I am as yet awaiting a response from The Law, who is seemingly otherwise engaged right now.

If discrimination against disability and race is accepted fare, then it doesn’t say a lot for this, nor any other forum.

Why does everything have to be so politically correct these days? What is actually wrong with "especially a speccy Chinese one" It`s not exactly racial abuse is it? What else should you call a Chinese guy?

Or is it the reference to spectacles that bothers you?

It's the obvious implication that a Chinese smart arse is somehow 'worse.' A similar statement might be 'no one likes a cheat, especially a black one'

dirk2686 wrote:

forcefraser wrote:

magwitch wrote:I don’t think he said Lockett “wanted” to get anyone killed.
The word “spacker” does not sit well with me at all.
Some idiot on this forum who I won’t name in case I swell his ego last week asked “who likes a smartarse?” - “especially a speccy, Chinese one”......

One so called moderator decided to humour him like it was perfectly acceptable to be racist and I am as yet awaiting a response from The Law, who is seemingly otherwise engaged right now.

If discrimination against disability and race is accepted fare, then it doesn’t say a lot for this, nor any other forum.

Why does everything have to be so politically correct these days? What is actually wrong with "especially a speccy Chinese one" It`s not exactly racial abuse is it? What else should you call a Chinese guy?

Or is it the reference to spectacles that bothers you?

It's the obvious implication that a Chinese smart arse is somehow 'worse.' A similar statement might be 'no one likes a cheat, especially a black one'