Re: Tyson Fury vs Hasim Rahman on the Khan card?
Posted: 04 Apr 2011, 11:51
Fury v Rahman has been confirmed by Sky now......
It's actually funny the amount of people who have mentioned 'Will the BBBoC santion Rahman'. They're talking like Hasim is 48, fat and punch drunk which isn't the case on all 3. Recent interview a few months ago show's he speaks clearly and looks healthy:oliverfennell wrote:Yes, it's a decent enough match. A lot of people disagreed with Botha being knocked back by the board, and I'm sure Rahman's in better nick than Botha.King Geedorah wrote:Good old fashioned heavyweight match. Prospect against a former title holder who has seen better days. The glory days of the division were built on these types of matches. I like it, I love it. Hope the BBBoC sanction Rahman as he's been active and can still pick a nice jab and right hand.
I like this, I love it.
Good. Putting aside the rights and wrongs of Munroe's defection, a fair bit of credit has to go to Hatton for initially putting together a half decent undercard and then rebuilding it when it collapsed.wadey wrote:Fury v Rahman has been confirmed by Sky now......
He actually sounds a little punchy there. Struggles to get his words out a little and has that slightly slurry & nasal sound that punchy guys do.exittored wrote:It's actually funny the amount of people who have mentioned 'Will the BBBoC santion Rahman'. They're talking like Hasim is 48, fat and punch drunk which isn't the case on all 3. Recent interview a few months ago show's he speaks clearly and looks healthy:oliverfennell wrote:Yes, it's a decent enough match. A lot of people disagreed with Botha being knocked back by the board, and I'm sure Rahman's in better nick than Botha.King Geedorah wrote:Good old fashioned heavyweight match. Prospect against a former title holder who has seen better days. The glory days of the division were built on these types of matches. I like it, I love it. Hope the BBBoC sanction Rahman as he's been active and can still pick a nice jab and right hand.
I like this, I love it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7RfGtom7IW0
As i mentioned before Rahman has never lost to a boxer who was outside the Top 10 Heavyweights at the time of the fight and he'll come into the fight in good shape and expecting to win, he's proabably seen tapes of Fury and had a chuckle to himself about how easy it's gonna be to spark Fury out plus picking up a good payday doing it.
He will definately be sanctioned...no problem.
allegedly is planning a ppv for that one no doubt.Camcas wrote:What happend to him fighting Chisora??
Everyone Wlad fights look terrible these days. Rahman might have taken six rounds to stop Reed but Toney couldn't do it in tenorbtastic wrote:He actually sounds a little punchy there. Struggles to get his words out a little and has that slightly slurry & nasal sound that punchy guys do.exittored wrote:It's actually funny the amount of people who have mentioned 'Will the BBBoC santion Rahman'. They're talking like Hasim is 48, fat and punch drunk which isn't the case on all 3. Recent interview a few months ago show's he speaks clearly and looks healthy:oliverfennell wrote: Yes, it's a decent enough match. A lot of people disagreed with Botha being knocked back by the board, and I'm sure Rahman's in better nick than Botha.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7RfGtom7IW0
As i mentioned before Rahman has never lost to a boxer who was outside the Top 10 Heavyweights at the time of the fight and he'll come into the fight in good shape and expecting to win, he's proabably seen tapes of Fury and had a chuckle to himself about how easy it's gonna be to spark Fury out plus picking up a good payday doing it.
He will definately be sanctioned...no problem.
He's look terrible lately, he was absolutely risible against Wlad and he's taking 6 rounds to beat the likes of Damon Reed?
Dont tempt him...Dan Dares wrote:allegedly is planning a ppv for that one no doubt.Camcas wrote:What happend to him fighting Chisora??
I don't think it would go that way. It's feasible Rahman could steamroller him early and "expose" him, but if starts to go rounds then I see Fury winning most of them. In that scenario, Rahman may still win by a stoppage at some point, but if it goes to the scorecards, it should be Fury comfortably.funtime wrote:not to sure why people are criticising this as a match-up. Rahman may be past his best, but he still has enough about him to take out a cocky upstart..... and he would definitely still be the best name on Furys decent resume thus far.
predictions?
Fury takes it on a very close decision for me.
Macklin v gevor and crolla v rees were acceptable. But this plus munroe fight are very poor. Adam smith is not doing his job insuring quality on sky bills.chris s wrote:Good fight and learning, but is it good enough for ppv chief support?
I'm expecting a one-sided Fury win as well. Judging by a fair share of the posts on this thread, this was some really good match making.G0mez wrote:Rahman will get battered mark my words.
Rahman is there for the taking no doubt but what exactly has Fury ever done that makes you think he's the man to do it apart from beating a bunch of nobodies and having 2 life and death struggles with the only half decent boxer he's ever faced?crusader wrote:I'm expecting a one-sided Fury win as well. Judging by a fair share of the posts on this thread, this was some really good match making.G0mez wrote:Rahman will get battered mark my words.