BoxRec

gilgamesh wrote:

kaiserbill wrote:

gilgamesh wrote:
At this point it's pretty clear he's a troll loaded, he's not answering questions or contributing to boxing conversation and is making outrageous predictions that nobody agrees with. Don't feed the troll

Is a troll somebody that dares to have a different opinion of yourself?

No, but he was asking you perfectly reasonable questions as to why you think Sanders could stop Holyfield.

Who has he ever cut to pieces?

When has Holyfield ever been bleeding profusely to the point that somebody thought of stopping one of his fights on cuts?

Hell everybody's entitled to opinion however crazy it may be, but there's no need to insult somebody's inteligence when they're just trying to move the conversation forward, and see why it is you think what you think.

Comprehension skills are needed.

Refer back to earlier posts.

I'm at a loss to what else to do, and apologise profusely to other posters for this mess caused by gilgamesh.

^^^^^^^

loaded_gloves wrote:Sorry, I plead guilty to feeding the troll. It's quite fitting that he's named himself after a disastrous historical figure however.

Anyway he and his various Boxrec alter-egos can disappear back under his bridge to discuss boxing intelligently.

Hey, can anyone remind me of one of those numerous famous results where a guy was so cut up he fell unconscious and was counted out? I'm not well educated enough to recall one.

I'm drawing a blank there, but I do remember a guy getting his face ripped to shreds in 3 different places until the fight was stopped and his fan base is so delusional that he clearly won that fight.

loaded_gloves wrote:Sorry, I plead guilty to feeding the troll. It's quite fitting that he's named himself after a disastrous historical figure however.

Anyway he and his various Boxrec alter-egos can disappear back under his bridge to discuss boxing intelligently.

Hey, can anyone remind me of one of those numerous famous results where a guy was so cut up he fell unconscious and was counted out? I'm not well educated enough to recall one.

Cutting to ribbons does not signify bleeding necessarily.

Indeed, it isn't even a specific figure of speech related to boxing.

Can you perhaps relate to the board who, in your paranoid frame of mind, You think I'm a parody/troll/multi/etc...etc... of?

Thanks.

You're still spewing babble and avoiding anything specific relating to your original hideously embarrassing post.

One guy spent his prime winning against the elite level A class.

The other guy spent his prime whacking C class journeymen and getting laid out with one punch by Nate Tubbs.

One waning 40 year old barely broke a sweat outclassing Hasim Rahman.

The other guy was knocked down and stopped by Hasim Rahman.

But if you want to pull a frankly embarrassing scenario out of your ass and say Corrie could cut up Evander in 4, thus doing what Lennox Lewis, Riddick Bowe and Mike Tyson couldn't do, don't be surprised when you are widely lampooned for doing so. To use your 'superior intelligence' as an excuse for not offering any justification for what you wrote whilst mixing metaphors and misspelling words like a subhuman retard only adds to the comedy you are providing all of us.

Mmmm...

I see the board retards are strong on here.

Still, it has served its purpose I suppose.

I remember over the years a guy called dynamite-something or other being particularly dull-witted.

I suppose I can add a couple more, and continue the policy of quality over quantity.

So saad.

kaiserbill wrote:

loaded_gloves wrote:Sorry, I plead guilty to feeding the troll. It's quite fitting that he's named himself after a disastrous historical figure however.

Anyway he and his various Boxrec alter-egos can disappear back under his bridge to discuss boxing intelligently.

Hey, can anyone remind me of one of those numerous famous results where a guy was so cut up he fell unconscious and was counted out? I'm not well educated enough to recall one.

Cutting to ribbons does not signify bleeding necessarily.

Indeed, it isn't even a specific figure of speech related to boxing.

Can you perhaps relate to the board who, in your paranoid frame of mind, You think I'm a parody/troll/multi/etc...etc... of?

Thanks.

Whichever definition you want to use, nobody ever did either thing to Holyfield inside of four rounds and he faced two-dozen or so greater fighters than Corrie Sanders.

I'd take the Qawi that Holyfield beat to give Corrie a living hell in there.

loaded_gloves wrote:You're still spewing babble and avoiding anything specific relating to your original hideously embarrassing post.

One guy spent his prime winning against the elite level A class.

The other guy spent his prime whacking C class journeymen and getting laid out with one punch by Nate Tubbs.

One waning 40 year old barely broke a sweat outclassing Hasim Rahman.

The other guy was knocked down and stopped by Hasim Rahman.

But if you want to pull a frankly embarrassing scenario out of your ass and say Corrie could cut up Evander in 4, thus doing what Lennox Lewis, Riddick Bowe and Mike Tyson couldn't do, don't be surprised when you are widely lampooned for doing so. To use your 'superior intelligence' as an excuse for not offering any justification for what you wrote whilst mixing metaphors and misspelling words like a subhuman retard only adds to the comedy you are providing all of us.

The only frankly embarrassing poster is you.

The concept of contenders being matched up is a ubiquitous thing that has happened through the ages.

Why you feel you need to shout this down demonstrates inadequacies to your personality that I would rather not go into.

Is there something about Evander and you, other than being a remote fan, that needs to be discussed?

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:

kaiserbill wrote:

loaded_gloves wrote:Sorry, I plead guilty to feeding the troll. It's quite fitting that he's named himself after a disastrous historical figure however.

Anyway he and his various Boxrec alter-egos can disappear back under his bridge to discuss boxing intelligently.

Hey, can anyone remind me of one of those numerous famous results where a guy was so cut up he fell unconscious and was counted out? I'm not well educated enough to recall one.

Cutting to ribbons does not signify bleeding necessarily.

Indeed, it isn't even a specific figure of speech related to boxing.

Can you perhaps relate to the board who, in your paranoid frame of mind, You think I'm a parody/troll/multi/etc...etc... of?

Thanks.

Whichever definition you want to use, nobody ever did either thing to Holyfield inside of four rounds and he faced two-dozen or so greater fighters than Corrie Sanders.

I'd take the Qawi that Holyfield beat to give Corrie a living hell in there.

Thank you.

That is a better response.

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:

kaiserbill wrote:

loaded_gloves wrote:Sorry, I plead guilty to feeding the troll. It's quite fitting that he's named himself after a disastrous historical figure however.

Anyway he and his various Boxrec alter-egos can disappear back under his bridge to discuss boxing intelligently.

Hey, can anyone remind me of one of those numerous famous results where a guy was so cut up he fell unconscious and was counted out? I'm not well educated enough to recall one.

Cutting to ribbons does not signify bleeding necessarily.

Indeed, it isn't even a specific figure of speech related to boxing.

Can you perhaps relate to the board who, in your paranoid frame of mind, You think I'm a parody/troll/multi/etc...etc... of?

Thanks.

Whichever definition you want to use, nobody ever did either thing to Holyfield inside of four rounds and he faced two-dozen or so greater fighters than Corrie Sanders.

I'd take the Qawi that Holyfield beat to give Corrie a living hell in there.

I would too Saad

gilgamesh wrote:

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:

kaiserbill wrote:
Cutting to ribbons does not signify bleeding necessarily.

Indeed, it isn't even a specific figure of speech related to boxing.

Can you perhaps relate to the board who, in your paranoid frame of mind, You think I'm a parody/troll/multi/etc...etc... of?

Thanks.

Whichever definition you want to use, nobody ever did either thing to Holyfield inside of four rounds and he faced two-dozen or so greater fighters than Corrie Sanders.

I'd take the Qawi that Holyfield beat to give Corrie a living hell in there.

I would too Saad

Maybe somebody can be a dear and start another Corrie Sanders thread.