Re: Scott Quigg's next opponent.....
Posted: 06 Aug 2014, 03:26
gallagher bangs on about unbeaten record.......wont let his fighters fight anyone with a pulse..............
the way Quigg's team seem to want to match him I have to wonder how much confidence they've got in him. I am starting to doubt Quigg - Frampton will ever be made. and also strongly suspect that if it were, Frampton would banjo him.columbo wrote:I'm firmly of the belief that Frampton would whoop Quiggs arse. I dont know how others feel on that particular potential matchup?
Will be interesting to see how this Tinatic quarter show is set up and how many people attend.Glass Joe wrote:Quigg going on a similar run to Hatton WBU run, a mealiness belt against meh opponents. I can't see Frampton - Quigg happening any time soon, it will take mega money for Frampton to fight quigg in Manchester. Pretty sure Quigg will have to go to belfast in a massive out door event.
Have you not noticed Shumenov at no3 at Cruiserweight !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Boxing Prospect wrote:WBA issues their updated rankings recently and...no Ambunda
http://www.wbanews.com/wp-content/uploa ... 4-july.pdf
Oddly Arenas is #11.
Hopefully someone manages to rip the WBA a new one for this and see if they refuse to sanction it...
Also odd that Walter Tello jumped from #14 at 105 last month to #6 at 108lbs this month...just before he fights Randy Petalcorin. At least they used to hide the grease palming a little bit...
Shumenov has been there since he lost to Hopkins.Naandrew wrote:Have you not noticed Shumenov at no3 at Cruiserweight !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Boxing Prospect wrote:WBA issues their updated rankings recently and...no Ambunda
http://www.wbanews.com/wp-content/uploa ... 4-july.pdf
Oddly Arenas is #11.
Hopefully someone manages to rip the WBA a new one for this and see if they refuse to sanction it...
Also odd that Walter Tello jumped from #14 at 105 last month to #6 at 108lbs this month...just before he fights Randy Petalcorin. At least they used to hide the grease palming a little bit...
I think Frampton could have more fans than Quigg there for that fight, even in Manchester.Glass Joe wrote:Quigg going on a similar run to Hatton WBU run, a mealiness belt against meh opponents. I can't see Frampton - Quigg happening any time soon, it will take mega money for Frampton to fight quigg in Manchester. Pretty sure Quigg will have to go to belfast in a massive out door event.
At one stage I thought this was a 50 /50 fight but whilst Frampton is sharpening his skills with live opponents, Quigg is going to be learn nothing against inferior opponents, I think Frampton stops him.Counter-puncher wrote:the way Quigg's team seem to want to match him I have to wonder how much confidence they've got in him. I am starting to doubt Quigg - Frampton will ever be made. and also strongly suspect that if it were, Frampton would banjo him.columbo wrote:I'm firmly of the belief that Frampton would whoop Quiggs arse. I dont know how others feel on that particular potential matchup?
Deffo same when mcloskey boxed khan there had to be more irish in the m.e.n that nite they lifted the roof off the placemickey1975 wrote:I think Frampton could have more fans than Quigg there for that fight, even in Manchester.Glass Joe wrote:Quigg going on a similar run to Hatton WBU run, a mealiness belt against meh opponents. I can't see Frampton - Quigg happening any time soon, it will take mega money for Frampton to fight quigg in Manchester. Pretty sure Quigg will have to go to belfast in a massive out door event.
Molitor, Kiko, Parodi & a super flyweight in CazaresManchester Massive wrote:
At one stage I thought this was a 50 /50 fight but whilst Frampton is sharpening his skills with live opponents, Quigg is going to be learn nothing against inferior opponents, I think Frampton stops him.
He has mentioned Rigondeaux in several IFL interviews. You're having a go at him for avoiding a guy who is being avoided by all the other top guys in the division. Have the promoters of Santa Cruz, Frampton and Martinez openly talked about Rigondeaux?rio wrote:Anyone see hearns dailymail column headline is "scott quigg has the division running scared"........made me laugh as he must have lost gary hydes number. Bit of a disgrace how hearn has a national platform and writes rubbish like that with no mention of rigo. It makes him look like a numpty to hardcore fans and to casuals it makes them thing that quigg is some animal no one will go near! Hearn must be thinking if warren can write utter shite then why shouldn't I!
https://mobile.twitter.com/leosantacruz ... 6566223872jameswilson wrote:He has mentioned Rigondeaux in several IFL interviews. You're having a go at him for avoiding a guy who is being avoided by all the other top guys in the division. Have the promoters of Santa Cruz, Frampton and Martinez openly talked about Rigondeaux?rio wrote:Anyone see hearns dailymail column headline is "scott quigg has the division running scared"........made me laugh as he must have lost gary hydes number. Bit of a disgrace how hearn has a national platform and writes rubbish like that with no mention of rigo. It makes him look like a numpty to hardcore fans and to casuals it makes them thing that quigg is some animal no one will go near! Hearn must be thinking if warren can write utter shite then why shouldn't I!
Theres a diffrence between ifl interview and a daily mail column. And kugan usally brings up rigo not the other way round. His quote about quigg having the division running from him is an out and out lie, howecer must casuals would take that to be fact where its nothing more than propaganda. Rigo is relevant to quigg considering he is the real belt holder and quigg is nothing more than a glorified interim champion.......hearn didn't mention this either.jameswilson wrote:He has mentioned Rigondeaux in several IFL interviews. You're having a go at him for avoiding a guy who is being avoided by all the other top guys in the division. Have the promoters of Santa Cruz, Frampton and Martinez openly talked about Rigondeaux?rio wrote:Anyone see hearns dailymail column headline is "scott quigg has the division running scared"........made me laugh as he must have lost gary hydes number. Bit of a disgrace how hearn has a national platform and writes rubbish like that with no mention of rigo. It makes him look like a numpty to hardcore fans and to casuals it makes them thing that quigg is some animal no one will go near! Hearn must be thinking if warren can write utter shite then why shouldn't I!
Don't ever become a boxing promoter, whatever you do.rio wrote:Theres a diffrence between ifl interview and a daily mail column. And kugan usally brings up rigo not the other way round. His quote about quigg having the division running from him is an out and out lie, howecer must casuals would take that to be fact where its nothing more than propaganda. Rigo is relevant to quigg considering he is the real belt holder and quigg is nothing more than a glorified interim champion.......hearn didn't mention this either.jameswilson wrote:He has mentioned Rigondeaux in several IFL interviews. You're having a go at him for avoiding a guy who is being avoided by all the other top guys in the division. Have the promoters of Santa Cruz, Frampton and Martinez openly talked about Rigondeaux?rio wrote:Anyone see hearns dailymail column headline is "scott quigg has the division running scared"........made me laugh as he must have lost gary hydes number. Bit of a disgrace how hearn has a national platform and writes rubbish like that with no mention of rigo. It makes him look like a numpty to hardcore fans and to casuals it makes them thing that quigg is some animal no one will go near! Hearn must be thinking if warren can write utter shite then why shouldn't I!
If Galahad wasn't that good he would have took it.Glass Joe wrote:He should of took the galahad fight 300-400k payout nice channel 5 fight, galahad isn't that good.
I like you mate as you know but fornicate off! LOLhandsofstone wrote:This looks a great fight for Quigg,Ambunda's a former world champ,his only loss is to Kameda whose a great fighter,the rest of his records patchy but as far as being an opponent for Scott,i think its decent,if Quigg was to stop him that would be impressive as he took Kameda the full 12
Yeah I think he would. Quiggs team must see some sort of risk to not do it clearly no mention of an offer for him to fight on Sky.pyenest77 wrote:More to it than that.
Quigg wouldnt fight on 5. Galahad would fight on Sky given the chance just like Fury did with BN.
columbo wrote:I like you mate as you know but eff off! LOLhandsofstone wrote:This looks a great fight for Quigg,Ambunda's a former world champ,his only loss is to Kameda whose a great fighter,the rest of his records patchy but as far as being an opponent for Scott,i think its decent,if Quigg was to stop him that would be impressive as he took Kameda the full 12