Page 3 of 3

Re: Khan Alexander and undercard

Posted: 14 Dec 2014, 01:05
by grannyman
Kootenay47 wrote:Khan got hit with a few hard shots to the head . Allowing himself to remain in range more now .
Khan is such a twonk, trying to sell Alexander as better than Brook, honestly.......

Re: Khan Alexander and undercard

Posted: 14 Dec 2014, 01:08
by Cyclops
Well this is excellent from Khan so far

Re: Khan Alexander and undercard

Posted: 14 Dec 2014, 01:08
by Ian1973
grannyman wrote:
Kootenay47 wrote:Khan got hit with a few hard shots to the head . Allowing himself to remain in range more now .
Khan is such a twonk, trying to sell Alexander as better than Brook, honestly.......

I've never thought Alexander was that good, he made hard work of it against Purdie IMO. Brook would beat him as convincingly as Khan is.

Re: Khan Alexander and undercard

Posted: 14 Dec 2014, 01:12
by reggaereggae
Khan hasn't lost 5 secs of this fight, let alone a round

Re: Khan Alexander and undercard

Posted: 14 Dec 2014, 01:12
by Cyclops
Ian1973 wrote:
grannyman wrote:
Kootenay47 wrote:Khan got hit with a few hard shots to the head . Allowing himself to remain in range more now .
Khan is such a twonk, trying to sell Alexander as better than Brook, honestly.......

I've never thought Alexander was that good, he made hard work of it against Purdie IMO. Brook would beat him as convincingly as Khan is.
Alexander is a good fighter. This is a shut out. It's a good performance from Khan.

Re: Khan Alexander and undercard

Posted: 14 Dec 2014, 01:12
by Kootenay47
Alexander has to take a couple short steps the right then crank the right hook . Looks like the right hook is the key for Alexander

Re: Khan Alexander and undercard

Posted: 14 Dec 2014, 01:13
by Tangerine
had a hard time with Purdy?he beat him with one hand?!

whats happened to the alexander that fought soto karass?

Re: Khan Alexander and undercard

Posted: 14 Dec 2014, 01:13
by illinijoejoe
Khan would win almost every minute against Thurman. The problem is the 2 minutes he doesn't he would be knocked out.

Re: Khan Alexander and undercard

Posted: 14 Dec 2014, 01:13
by grannyman
Kootenay47 wrote:Alexander has to take a couple short steps the right then crank the right hook . Looks like the right hook is the key for Alexander
A bit late now!

Re: Khan Alexander and undercard

Posted: 14 Dec 2014, 01:13
by Ian1973
Alexander is a good fighter. This is a shut out. It's a good performance from Khan.


He's good but he ain't great.

Re: Khan Alexander and undercard

Posted: 14 Dec 2014, 01:15
by reggaereggae
I am not a Khan fan, but that was a masterclass.

Re: Khan Alexander and undercard

Posted: 14 Dec 2014, 01:16
by grannyman
Not a mark on Alexander, he could have gone for it a lot earlier.

Re: Khan Alexander and undercard

Posted: 14 Dec 2014, 01:16
by Ian1973
Very impressive from Khan tonight.

I think he'd beat Mayweather, get KO'd by Thurman and Khan v Pacquiao would be areal 50/50.

There you go, you read it here first. ;;-)


PS! Not that I think Thurman is unbeatable, I just think he's all wrong for Khan.

Re: Khan Alexander and undercard

Posted: 14 Dec 2014, 01:17
by Kootenay47
Good win for Khan . Very poor ring adaptability by Alexander needs a new trainer after that shellacing

Re: Khan Alexander and undercard

Posted: 14 Dec 2014, 01:17
by Taansend
Great performance from Amir.

Re: Khan Alexander and undercard

Posted: 14 Dec 2014, 01:17
by Cyclops
Ian1973 wrote:
Alexander is a good fighter. This is a shut out. It's a good performance from Khan.


He's good but he ain't great.
Yeah, I agree. But he's a decent, solid welterwight. Amir should have won to prove himself and I expected him to do it. But he absolutely shut him out. That shows Amir is a very good fighter.

Good crowd there tonight. Proper into it.

Re: Khan Alexander and undercard

Posted: 14 Dec 2014, 01:19
by Tangerine
GreedyG wrote:That was possibly the best performance of Khan's career.
agreed

Re: Khan Alexander and undercard

Posted: 14 Dec 2014, 01:19
by reggaereggae
GreedyG wrote:That was possibly the best performance of Khan's career.
I agree. I cant believe one judge gave Alexander two rounds???!!!

Devon didn't win a second of that fight........... great performance

Re: Khan Alexander and undercard

Posted: 14 Dec 2014, 01:29
by crusader
I know loads of people complain about him getting the fight, but I'd be very interested in how Khan does against Mayweather. I think those lightening-fast hands could provide Floyd with serious problems.

Re: Khan Alexander and undercard

Posted: 14 Dec 2014, 01:33
by Ian1973
crusader wrote:I know loads of people complain about him getting the fight, but I'd be very interested in how Khan does against Mayweather. I think those lightening-fast hands could provide Floyd with serious problems.

Floyd (NOW) isn't quick enough to deal with Khan's speed and I don't think he has the one punch power to stop Khan. I doubt Mayweather will take the fight.

Re: Khan Alexander and undercard

Posted: 14 Dec 2014, 02:25
by diddy
reggaereggae wrote:
GreedyG wrote:That was possibly the best performance of Khan's career.
I agree. I cant believe one judge gave Alexander two rounds???!!!

Devon didn't win a second of that fight........... great performance
Julie Lederman saw the fight for Devon.

Re: Khan Alexander and undercard

Posted: 14 Dec 2014, 12:25
by expe
crusader wrote:I know loads of people complain about him getting the fight, but I'd be very interested in how Khan does against Mayweather. I think those lightening-fast hands could provide Floyd with serious problems.
Can't think of anyone else in front of him, Bradley needs a win and he's with TR, Garcia's had a bad year and he's yet to move up to welterweight, unless the Pacman fight finally happens or he goes up to middleweight for Cotto, I can see Khan getting the fight. Realistically, who else has earned it and is a big enough name to make it a realistic fight?