Page 3 of 3
Re: the law suits against manny are dangerous ...
Posted: 29 Aug 2015, 06:40
by caldo2025
Tanzio wrote:Being as ignorant as you are you get upset when you are called out for your ridiculous accusations and assumptions. You are very adept at expressing your ignorance on any subject, with pride. You aren't so good at reading or the comprehension of the little you actually do bother to read.
I didn't buy the fight Mr. Dumberer. I also did not wager on the fight. You would know that if you actually read more than the post where I named you.
You would also know that this has nothing to do with Pac fighting through an injury and everything to do with both teams concealing the information.
But you assume I believe in frivolous lawsuits. You accuse me of things that you have no idea about.
What I am pointing out about the Pac v FMJ situation is based on information that has been published which clearly represents that if Pac was injured both camps were aware of it and concealed it from the public.
What you are accusing me of is based on a fantasy you have conceived in that pea between your ears. But, that is characteristic of how you move through the world, Mr. Dumberer.
I have been sued and I sue when necessary. It is part of doing business, Mr. Dumberer. That is what the courts are for. This is a contract economy. If contracts are disputed we must get them resolved in court so we don't have to shoot it out.
But, you really don't have the capacity to understand much of that because it doesn't mesh with your fantasy of you knowing all about every subject and everyone who disagrees is a hater or dumb.
Yeah, you bored me after the first paragraph so i didn't waste time reading it. Way to capture the reader there Mr. Hemmingway.
Re: the law suits against manny are dangerous ...
Posted: 29 Aug 2015, 09:29
by koolkc107
Tanzio wrote:koolkc107 wrote:No proof Floyd's camp knew of any injury.
And even if the fantastic was true and they did, what obligation did they have to report unsubstantiated hearsay?
IJS....
Except of course Team FMJ's claim that they knew everything going on in Pac's camp.
And of course everything The Money Team claims is gospel truth, right?
Like the 5 hour sparring sessions and the late night weed parties...oh yeah, they claimed those were "entertainment", just staged things to hype PPV buys.
So, unless someone is willing to swear in court that they were a leak (and unless that leak can actually document his or her actions) I would say that any rumors of what Floyd did or did not know don't amount to a hill of beans or a swim in the ocean.
Re: the law suits against manny are dangerous ...
Posted: 29 Aug 2015, 11:01
by Tanzio
koolkc107 wrote:Tanzio wrote:koolkc107 wrote:No proof Floyd's camp knew of any injury.
And even if the fantastic was true and they did, what obligation did they have to report unsubstantiated hearsay?
IJS....
Except of course Team FMJ's claim that they knew everything going on in Pac's camp.
And of course everything The Money Team claims is gospel truth, right?
Like the 5 hour sparring sessions and the late night weed parties...oh yeah, they claimed those were "entertainment", just staged things to hype PPV buys.
So, unless someone is willing to swear in court that they were a leak (and unless that leak can actually document his or her actions) I would say that any rumors of what Floyd did or did not know don't amount to a hill of beans or a swim in the ocean.
That is what sworn depositions are for.
Re: the law suits against manny are dangerous ...
Posted: 29 Aug 2015, 11:03
by Tanzio
caldo2025 wrote:Tanzio wrote:Being as ignorant as you are you get upset when you are called out for your ridiculous accusations and assumptions. You are very adept at expressing your ignorance on any subject, with pride. You aren't so good at reading or the comprehension of the little you actually do bother to read.
I didn't buy the fight Mr. Dumberer. I also did not wager on the fight. You would know that if you actually read more than the post where I named you.
You would also know that this has nothing to do with Pac fighting through an injury and everything to do with both teams concealing the information.
But you assume I believe in frivolous lawsuits. You accuse me of things that you have no idea about.
What I am pointing out about the Pac v FMJ situation is based on information that has been published which clearly represents that if Pac was injured both camps were aware of it and concealed it from the public.
What you are accusing me of is based on a fantasy you have conceived in that pea between your ears. But, that is characteristic of how you move through the world, Mr. Dumberer.
I have been sued and I sue when necessary. It is part of doing business, Mr. Dumberer. That is what the courts are for. This is a contract economy. If contracts are disputed we must get them resolved in court so we don't have to shoot it out.
But, you really don't have the capacity to understand much of that because it doesn't mesh with your fantasy of you knowing all about every subject and everyone who disagrees is a hater or dumb.
Yeah, you bored me after the first paragraph so i didn't waste time reading it. Way to capture the reader there Mr. Hemmingway.
What a shock!! Mr. Dumberer's attention span matches the girth of the pea betwixt his ears.
Re: the law suits against manny are dangerous ...
Posted: 30 Aug 2015, 20:09
by ClivePatrickLyons
jamesmcdonnell wrote:But Tanzio, fighters go into fights with minor injuries of all kinds - sparring and training invariably leads to minor injuries, it puts wear and tear on the body, most professional athletes are carrying some sort of injury pretty much routinely. Unless an injury is such that a fighter can't actually throw punches (which was clearly not so in this case), then it would be absolutely impossible to legislate and rightly so. There's no grounds for a sensible litigation process.
My prediction, this lawsuit will come to nothing, there will be no proof of collusion, and therefore no case to bring.

tanzio this is you
