BoxRec

after 3 pages has horse not actually commented on this topic(although i may have just missed if he did). if mm wins this then hes surely gona be his b&I p4p no.1. or 2 like myself es a big fury fan

Groves in 3.

watsupdoc87 wrote:after 3 pages has horse not actually commented on this topic(although i may have just missed if he did). if mm wins this then hes surely gona be his b&I p4p no.1. or 2 like myself es a big fury fan

He may have commented under another username (he's like that)

Sisyphus wrote:

watsupdoc87 wrote:after 3 pages has horse not actually commented on this topic(although i may have just missed if he did). if mm wins this then hes surely gona be his b&I p4p no.1. or 2 like myself es a big fury fan

He may have commented under another username (he's like that)

Surely not

Sisyphus wrote:

watsupdoc87 wrote:after 3 pages has horse not actually commented on this topic(although i may have just missed if he did). if mm wins this then hes surely gona be his b&I p4p no.1. or 2 like myself es a big fury fan

He may have commented under another username (he's like that)

Its remarkable that you feel in a position to generalise about fellow posters, having been a member on the site an entire day. You must have done some diligent research in such a short time, to arrive at a conclusion so quickly. Perhaps others might wonder why you focussed this research so intently on horse, or even that you might not be an entirely new poster, I really couldn't say.

Counter-puncher wrote:Its remarkable that you feel in a position to generalise about fellow posters, having been a member on the site an entire day. You must have done some diligent research in such a short time, to arrive at a conclusion so quickly. Perhaps others might wonder why you focussed this research so intently on horse, or even that you might not be an entirely new poster, I really couldn't say.

You need to keep up CP; I've been accused of actually being HORSE on two separate occasions (something I will not conform or deny) So when I made the comment that HORSE may have posted in this thread under another guise, I was in fact referring to MY post on this thread, alluding to the rumour (as stated above) that I am in fact HORSE.

It's slightly abstract I agree (especially for someone with your obvious limitations) but it does make perfect sense if you follow it carefully.

Sisyphus wrote:

watsupdoc87 wrote:after 3 pages has horse not actually commented on this topic(although i may have just missed if he did). if mm wins this then hes surely gona be his b&I p4p no.1. or 2 like myself es a big fury fan

He may have commented under another username (he's like that)

Too busy wanking over pictures of Breazeale.

Sisyphus wrote:

Counter-puncher wrote:Its remarkable that you feel in a position to generalise about fellow posters, having been a member on the site an entire day. You must have done some diligent research in such a short time, to arrive at a conclusion so quickly. Perhaps others might wonder why you focussed this research so intently on horse, or even that you might not be an entirely new poster, I really couldn't say.

You need to keep up CP; I've been accused of actually being HORSE on two separate occasions (something I will not conform or deny) So when I made the comment that HORSE may have posted in this thread under another guise, I was in fact referring to MY post on this thread, alluding to the rumour (as stated above) that I am in fact HORSE.

It's slightly abstract I agree (especially for someone with your obvious limitations) but it does make perfect sense if you follow it carefully.

Whatever, PIGG, you pointless fucken troll

Counter-puncher wrote:

Sisyphus wrote:

watsupdoc87 wrote:after 3 pages has horse not actually commented on this topic(although i may have just missed if he did). if mm wins this then hes surely gona be his b&I p4p no.1. or 2 like myself es a big fury fan

He may have commented under another username (he's like that)

Its remarkable that you feel in a position to generalise about fellow posters, having been a member on the site an entire day. You must have done some diligent research in such a short time, to arrive at a conclusion so quickly. Perhaps others might wonder why you focussed this research so intently on horse, or even that you might not be an entirely new poster, I really couldn't say.

im on tis site afew years now

Counter-puncher wrote:Whatever, PIGG, you pointless fucken troll

higgs88 wrote:Think i'm the only person who really doesnt like this fight, just think Murray is too small and will be blown away like Smith was. Murray is never exciting either so all the action will be coming from Groves

I repeat, but now know Murray will be knocked in similar fashion to kahn, Murray is so overrated (getting battered for however many rounds doesn't make you good)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h75WecDwOtU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6DJEKbEVpKQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGTBS4cOqCw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LBk3M2enmKE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWdHgUdJXoc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fsM99y8Y6UE

I like Murray by decision, but this is a very competitive and interesting matchup. Nothing would surprise me, but I expect it will definitely go the distance.

The fight aside, this will surely be the dullest "The Gloves are off" sky have commissioned? !

mullenman wrote:Easy night for George imo

Agreed.

Martin Murray, by brutal first round KO.

Groves in charge early, Murray bosses late.

Draw!

ILikeBeer wrote:Martin Murray, by brutal first round KO.

I hope so mate

Rematch at Wembley in front of 79,999 people

If you lose a decision to Abraham you're not beating Groves on points.

I've just watched the press conference posted above and I thought Eddie Hearn was sailing a bit close to the wind at the end mocking George with the pull and push comment. No need for it.

CaptainSpacerod wrote:I've just watched the press conference posted above and I thought Eddie Hearn was sailing a bit close to the wind at the end mocking George with the pull and push comment. No need for it.

SHOCK NEWS! Eddie Hearn being a bit of a tit.

CaptainSpacerod wrote:I've just watched the press conference posted above and I thought Eddie Hearn was sailing a bit close to the wind at the end mocking George with the pull and push comment. No need for it.

I have noticed with Eddie that because he spends so much time with boxers he now actually thinks that he is some kind of hard case himself.

As Frampton showed, he needs to be careful or someone will give him a slap sooner ir later.

ILikeBeer wrote:

CaptainSpacerod wrote:I've just watched the press conference posted above and I thought Eddie Hearn was sailing a bit close to the wind at the end mocking George with the pull and push comment. No need for it.

SHOCK NEWS! Eddie Hearn being a bit of a tit.

There's a difference between being a bit of a tit and openly mocking a fighter in front of his peers especially one who will shortly risk life and limb in order to make Eddie money. Where's the respect ffs. I can't think of any other occasion where a promoter has ridiculed one of the fighters on an upcoming show just for the fun of it.

I'm not particularly comfortable with Froch childishly belittling Groves at every opportunity but Carl would argue that George has it coming for the way he disrespected him in the build up to their fights. Even assuming that Eddie's as close to Carl as he thinks he is, it's still not his place to do Carl's bidding for him

I don't think Eddie's deluded enough to view himself as a hardcase as bripez suggests but I think the Frampton Quigg pressers left him with the mistaken belief that he's some kind of funny man.

His dad should have a word with him.

What is the push and pull reference.