Hearn's Idea of Matchmaking

keirw
Middleweight
Posts: 2681
Joined: 03 Nov 2013, 10:55

Re: Hearn's Idea of Matchmaking

Post by keirw »

blanca wrote:how is hearn gonna create his obligatory bad blood between burns and crolla? both very nice fellas.
I'm sure we will see Ohara Davies on the undercard giving it big licks and getting the crowd fired up
forcefraser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5439
Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15

Re: Hearn's Idea of Matchmaking

Post by forcefraser »

Indongo aint nottin but a thang....

Burns outpoints him.
bigped
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1571
Joined: 05 Jul 2004, 16:26

Re: Hearn's Idea of Matchmaking

Post by bigped »

PredatorHayds wrote:
bigped wrote:
Horse wrote:Is Indongo even that big of a puncher?

3 of his last 6 opponents have managed to go the full 12 rounds distance with him.
I have it on good authority he can't punch at all
He knocked the IBF world champion out in 30 seconds!!
It was a freak punch, if he never landed that he is losing the fight, he can obviously punch to
A extent but nothing that burns hasn't been in with or seen before , he's not a proper puncher , burns will win maybe even stop him
horndawg80
Cruiserweight
Posts: 486
Joined: 26 Apr 2011, 00:25

Re: Hearn's Idea of Matchmaking

Post by horndawg80 »

Bellew is very good at that... Transferring body weight on left hook
Ossyrules
Super Lightweight
Posts: 3050
Joined: 25 Mar 2017, 19:11

Re: Hearn's Idea of Matchmaking

Post by Ossyrules »

Flanagan vs Crolla is the obvious match up to make. 2 brits, both mancs, same weight, both had belts. They've missed an opportunity there. The option to fight linares is a big one for crolla I get that though. Putting aside politics crolla should chase Flanagan.

The fact it won't get made is everything that's wrong with boxing. Promoters and networks should assist fighters in getting these deals made. It's the fighters that are putting it all on the line. Not be the hurdle making the fight impossible to make.

Boxing hurts itself sometimes
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22334
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Hearn's Idea of Matchmaking

Post by Horse »

Ossyrules wrote:Boxing hurts itself sometimes
All of the time.

Boxing is a shadow of what it could be.
ozzy1875
Middleweight
Posts: 164
Joined: 11 May 2014, 14:49

Re: Hearn's Idea of Matchmaking

Post by ozzy1875 »

Ossyrules wrote:Flanagan vs Crolla is the obvious match up to make. 2 brits, both mancs, same weight, both had belts. They've missed an opportunity there. The option to fight linares is a big one for crolla I get that though. Putting aside politics crolla should chase Flanagan.

The fact it won't get made is everything that's wrong with boxing. Promoters and networks should assist fighters in getting these deals made. It's the fighters that are putting it all on the line. Not be the hurdle making the fight impossible to make.

Boxing hurts itself sometimes
Frank tried to make the fight, twice, and it was never entertained by Matchroom.
Ossyrules
Super Lightweight
Posts: 3050
Joined: 25 Mar 2017, 19:11

Re: Hearn's Idea of Matchmaking

Post by Ossyrules »

ozzy1875 wrote:
Ossyrules wrote:Flanagan vs Crolla is the obvious match up to make. 2 brits, both mancs, same weight, both had belts. They've missed an opportunity there. The option to fight linares is a big one for crolla I get that though. Putting aside politics crolla should chase Flanagan.

The fact it won't get made is everything that's wrong with boxing. Promoters and networks should assist fighters in getting these deals made. It's the fighters that are putting it all on the line. Not be the hurdle making the fight impossible to make.

Boxing hurts itself sometimes
Frank tried to make the fight, twice, and it was never entertained by Matchroom.
Boxers deserve to be paid well and I understand going for money fights but it always saddens me when important boxing matches get ignored solely for this reason. They will all say before they've turned pro they want to be world champion, not I want to be a millionaire and if I pick up a belt it's a bonus
dirk2686
Super Lightweight
Posts: 1982
Joined: 26 Sep 2016, 09:35

Re: Hearn's Idea of Matchmaking

Post by dirk2686 »

ozzy1875 wrote:
Ossyrules wrote:Flanagan vs Crolla is the obvious match up to make. 2 brits, both mancs, same weight, both had belts. They've missed an opportunity there. The option to fight linares is a big one for crolla I get that though. Putting aside politics crolla should chase Flanagan.

The fact it won't get made is everything that's wrong with boxing. Promoters and networks should assist fighters in getting these deals made. It's the fighters that are putting it all on the line. Not be the hurdle making the fight impossible to make.

Boxing hurts itself sometimes
Frank tried to make the fight, twice, and it was never entertained by Matchroom.
Frank tries to make a lot of fights that don't happen. Funny how all those years of negotiations with the likes of Johnson and Hopkins for Calzaghe never seemed to go anywhere but he was more than capable of securing Evans Ashira.

It's not like Crolla has taken easier fights in fairness. The reality is Crolla has had a good run of hard fights and Flanagan has remained do the radar. Perhaps the fight was knocked back because Frank pays peanuts?
sammy95
Middleweight
Posts: 390
Joined: 20 Nov 2013, 16:18

Re: Hearn's Idea of Matchmaking

Post by sammy95 »

The real issue with Crolla-Flanagan is which TV channel it goes out on...which will largely depend on who offers the most money as well as several other less monetary issues.

Would FW let one of his few world champions go across to Sky and potentially lose his only negotiating tool after signing a massive deal with BT?
Would Hearn let Crolla go over to BN / BT and fight for a world title which could well be the springboard fight FW so desperately needs to attract the casual supporters?
Are both boxers tied to TV channels in their contracts?

Many variables that need to be considered / hurdled, and before then I think the fight is a long way a way.
Stuffs
Welterweight
Posts: 611
Joined: 29 Jun 2016, 06:28

Re: Hearn's Idea of Matchmaking

Post by Stuffs »

In football, England travel to Scotland for a match on June 10th. Glasgow Hydro is free that night, be about a reasonable time for Matchroom's own England v Scotland with Burns v Crolla.

Can see Eddie trying to get that together.
bigped
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1571
Joined: 05 Jul 2004, 16:26

Re: Hearn's Idea of Matchmaking

Post by bigped »

Stuffs wrote:In football, England travel to Scotland for a match on June 10th. Glasgow Hydro is free that night, be about a reasonable time for Matchroom's own England v Scotland with Burns v Crolla.

Can see Eddie trying to get that together.
Police Scotland wouldn't allow it , and would affect ticket sales , Scotland vs England will be a sell out
Stuffs
Welterweight
Posts: 611
Joined: 29 Jun 2016, 06:28

Re: Hearn's Idea of Matchmaking

Post by Stuffs »

.
Last edited by Stuffs on 28 Mar 2017, 09:49, edited 1 time in total.
Stuffs
Welterweight
Posts: 611
Joined: 29 Jun 2016, 06:28

Re: Hearn's Idea of Matchmaking

Post by Stuffs »

bigped wrote:
Stuffs wrote:In football, England travel to Scotland for a match on June 10th. Glasgow Hydro is free that night, be about a reasonable time for Matchroom's own England v Scotland with Burns v Crolla.

Can see Eddie trying to get that together.
Police Scotland wouldn't allow it , and would affect ticket sales , Scotland vs England will be a sell out
They've had Crolla on in Manchester when Man United are at home, which is a cross-over fanbase.
keirw
Middleweight
Posts: 2681
Joined: 03 Nov 2013, 10:55

Re: Hearn's Idea of Matchmaking

Post by keirw »

Stuffs wrote:In football, England travel to Scotland for a match on June 10th. Glasgow Hydro is free that night, be about a reasonable time for Matchroom's own England v Scotland with Burns v Crolla.

Can see Eddie trying to get that together.
Can't see it being that soon, it doesn't give either fighter anywhere near enough time to prepare.
Stuffs
Welterweight
Posts: 611
Joined: 29 Jun 2016, 06:28

Re: Hearn's Idea of Matchmaking

Post by Stuffs »

keirw wrote:
Stuffs wrote:In football, England travel to Scotland for a match on June 10th. Glasgow Hydro is free that night, be about a reasonable time for Matchroom's own England v Scotland with Burns v Crolla.

Can see Eddie trying to get that together.
Can't see it being that soon, it doesn't give either fighter anywhere near enough time to prepare.
True.

I'm sure it'll be playing on Eddie's mind to try for it somehow though.
world ranked
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2199
Joined: 21 Jan 2008, 14:21

Re: Hearn's Idea of Matchmaking

Post by world ranked »

Stuarty30 wrote:
world ranked wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:
If you think Crolla coming off two defeats and having never fought at 140 is a bigger fight for Burns than pound for pounder Crawford or multi-weight world champion Broner then you need your head looked at :doh:
Please get the Crawford fight out of your mind. That fight isn't an option. Broner is only bigger in name. There money will be a little more with Broner. Its all about what Burns wants. Does he want to lose his titles just to say he fought the big names then go for it. Take that loss but UK fans will remember him for the domestic dust ups. Nobody will remember he lost to Crawford or Figueroa but his other great night winning and defending his title. There no fun in remembering Ricky Hatton near loss to Luis Collazo or getting stopped by FLoyd or Manny but they all will remember his crowning moment vs Tsyzu.
Crawford has said he wants the winner of Burns Indongo. Burns (if he wins) would rather have a chance at avenging his loss to Crawford. A very slim chance admittedly but that's the way Burns is. If the money isn't there in the US then Crawford or Broner over here is far bigger than Crolla. It's not even close.

It's got feck all to do with what people remember it's about your options at the time. If Burns loses next Crolla makes sense. If he wins he has more options available to him.
He can say he wants him but there's no market for that fight. The US market will not accept that fight. Bob Arum knows better than to give him Burns again.
world ranked
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2199
Joined: 21 Jan 2008, 14:21

Re: Hearn's Idea of Matchmaking

Post by world ranked »

sammy95 wrote:The real issue with Crolla-Flanagan is which TV channel it goes out on...which will largely depend on who offers the most money as well as several other less monetary issues.

Would FW let one of his few world champions go across to Sky and potentially lose his only negotiating tool after signing a massive deal with BT?
Would Hearn let Crolla go over to BN / BT and fight for a world title which could well be the springboard fight FW so desperately needs to attract the casual supporters?
Are both boxers tied to TV channels in their contracts?

Many variables that need to be considered / hurdled, and before then I think the fight is a long way a way.
If its not Sky it doesn't make sense. This is a non-starter. Good point about the other reason people seem to think this is easy to make. It's not.
Stuarty
Super Welterweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Hearn's Idea of Matchmaking

Post by Stuarty »

world ranked wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:
world ranked wrote:
Please get the Crawford fight out of your mind. That fight isn't an option. Broner is only bigger in name. There money will be a little more with Broner. Its all about what Burns wants. Does he want to lose his titles just to say he fought the big names then go for it. Take that loss but UK fans will remember him for the domestic dust ups. Nobody will remember he lost to Crawford or Figueroa but his other great night winning and defending his title. There no fun in remembering Ricky Hatton near loss to Luis Collazo or getting stopped by FLoyd or Manny but they all will remember his crowning moment vs Tsyzu.
Crawford has said he wants the winner of Burns Indongo. Burns (if he wins) would rather have a chance at avenging his loss to Crawford. A very slim chance admittedly but that's the way Burns is. If the money isn't there in the US then Crawford or Broner over here is far bigger than Crolla. It's not even close.

It's got feck all to do with what people remember it's about your options at the time. If Burns loses next Crolla makes sense. If he wins he has more options available to him.
He can say he wants him but there's no market for that fight. The US market will not accept that fight. Bob Arum knows better than to give him Burns again.
Bob Arum can't wipe his own arse. Last time he had an erection the Berlin Wall was still up.

Crawford fought John Molina last time so he's obviously struggling for opponents. As i said, if there's not a market for it in the US then Crawford can come here. He's a bigger draw than Crolla as is Broner.
world ranked
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2199
Joined: 21 Jan 2008, 14:21

Re: Hearn's Idea of Matchmaking

Post by world ranked »

Stuarty30 wrote:
world ranked wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:
Crawford has said he wants the winner of Burns Indongo. Burns (if he wins) would rather have a chance at avenging his loss to Crawford. A very slim chance admittedly but that's the way Burns is. If the money isn't there in the US then Crawford or Broner over here is far bigger than Crolla. It's not even close.

It's got feck all to do with what people remember it's about your options at the time. If Burns loses next Crolla makes sense. If he wins he has more options available to him.
He can say he wants him but there's no market for that fight. The US market will not accept that fight. Bob Arum knows better than to give him Burns again.
Bob Arum can't wipe his own arse. Last time he had an erection the Berlin Wall was still up.

Crawford fought John Molina last time so he's obviously struggling for opponents. As i said, if there's not a market for it in the US then Crawford can come here. He's a bigger draw than Crolla as is Broner.
He already been to Scotland for Burns. I don't think Hearn or fans of Burns what to see Burns take another dominating loss. It makes no sense and I'm quite confident even if Burns beats Indongo that Crawford 2 won't happen.
Stuarty
Super Welterweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Hearn's Idea of Matchmaking

Post by Stuarty »

world ranked wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:
world ranked wrote:
He can say he wants him but there's no market for that fight. The US market will not accept that fight. Bob Arum knows better than to give him Burns again.
Bob Arum can't wipe his own arse. Last time he had an erection the Berlin Wall was still up.

Crawford fought John Molina last time so he's obviously struggling for opponents. As i said, if there's not a market for it in the US then Crawford can come here. He's a bigger draw than Crolla as is Broner.
He already been to Scotland for Burns. I don't think Hearn or fans of Burns what to see Burns take another dominating loss. It makes no sense and I'm quite confident even if Burns beats Indongo that Crawford 2 won't happen.
Maybe it won't but they've both been on record as saying they're interested in fighting again so you never know.
Oiky
Super Welterweight
Posts: 7265
Joined: 16 Feb 2015, 09:22

Re: Hearn's Idea of Matchmaking

Post by Oiky »

Doubt he'll box Crawford again

Levels
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13394
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Hearn's Idea of Matchmaking

Post by jameswilson »

bigped wrote:if he never landed that he is losing the fight, he can obviously punch to
A extent but nothing that burns hasn't been in with or seen before , he's not a proper puncher , burns will win maybe even stop him
If only my Auntie had bollocks she'd be my uncle.
Greg Houston
Middleweight
Posts: 209
Joined: 23 Dec 2013, 05:57

Re: Hearn's Idea of Matchmaking

Post by Greg Houston »

bigped wrote:
Stuffs wrote:In football, England travel to Scotland for a match on June 10th. Glasgow Hydro is free that night, be about a reasonable time for Matchroom's own England v Scotland with Burns v Crolla.

Can see Eddie trying to get that together.
Police Scotland wouldn't allow it , and would affect ticket sales , Scotland vs England will be a sell out
My thoughts exactly, plus the game is a 17:00 kick off, so would actually clash with the start of the card.
Post Reply