BoxRec

I must say E-O is a ONE annoying weirdo. He needs some wet pus.y to calm down.

Jacobs had 12 rounds to do it and couldn't get it done. If the fight were a money maker then it would be another thing or if there were a rematch clause as well. Move on people.

This is better for Jacobs anyway because now he can go on for six fights claiming that he beat GGG and would defeat him in a rematch instead of fighting him again immediately and getting his head knocked off. Because that is what will happen in the rematch.

caldo2025 wrote:Jacobs had 12 rounds to do it and couldn't get it done. If the fight were a money maker then it would be another thing or if there were a rematch clause as well. Move on people.

This is better for Jacobs anyway because now he can go on for six fights claiming that he beat GGG and would defeat him in a rematch instead of fighting him again immediately and getting his head knocked off. Because that is what will happen in the rematch.

..I agree ..everyone did a good job..time to move on..

greg wrote:

caldo2025 wrote:Jacobs had 12 rounds to do it and couldn't get it done. If the fight were a money maker then it would be another thing or if there were a rematch clause as well. Move on people.

This is better for Jacobs anyway because now he can go on for six fights claiming that he beat GGG and would defeat him in a rematch instead of fighting him again immediately and getting his head knocked off. Because that is what will happen in the rematch.

..I agree ..everyone did a good job..time to move on..

right? Jacobs gained notoriety in the loss and upped his money making potential. GGG got credit for his toughest win to date and doesn't appear to have lost anything with the win. So to me, that's a win win situation.

caldo2025 wrote:

greg wrote:

caldo2025 wrote:Jacobs had 12 rounds to do it and couldn't get it done. If the fight were a money maker then it would be another thing or if there were a rematch clause as well. Move on people.

This is better for Jacobs anyway because now he can go on for six fights claiming that he beat GGG and would defeat him in a rematch instead of fighting him again immediately and getting his head knocked off. Because that is what will happen in the rematch.

..I agree ..everyone did a good job..time to move on..

right? Jacobs gained notoriety in the loss and upped his money making potential. GGG got credit for his toughest win to date and doesn't appear to have lost anything with the win. So to me, that's a win win situation.

..yep, Jacobs made GGG look human which is a great achievement in itself, GGG still prevailed and should now take the next logical step..

Yes, neither mans reputation should be damaged if you ask me.

Both gave great accounts of themselves

crow wrote:

Enlightened-One wrote:

crow wrote:Who says Jacobs wants a rematch ?

One year ago, he was claiming he needs at least 3 more fights to be ready for Gennady.

Now he's oh so brave....

Are you really suggesting that Jacobs is scared of Golovkin?

Jacobs and his manager both want the rematch.

They better thank the gods Golovkin injured something during the contest and now has to sit out until september.

Gennady can make 3 times his Jacobs purse vs Eubank Jr.

He can make 5-10 times vs Canelo.

According to you he should forfeit it just because it was a close win?

You're seriously doing backflips to defend Golovkin from rematching his biggest threat.

Lackeos wrote:

crow wrote:

Enlightened-One wrote: Are you really suggesting that Jacobs is scared of Golovkin?

Jacobs and his manager both want the rematch.

They better thank the gods Golovkin injured something during the contest and now has to sit out until september.

Gennady can make 3 times his Jacobs purse vs Eubank Jr.

He can make 5-10 times vs Canelo.

According to you he should forfeit it just because it was a close win?

You're seriously doing backflips to defend Golovkin from rematching his biggest threat.

Jacobs had his chances to fight Golovkin for years, including last December, but he chose not to. Now Golovkin needs to bend over and give him a rematch sacrificing much better options? Who is doing backflips here?

Fight was closer than Floyd/Maidana 1 ...
The bias the general fan has in boxing is similar to hometown fans rooting for their team.
In a judging sport, that's a bad thing.

I had GGG and Floyd winning by 3...each were competitive fights with the right man winning.

BAD INTENTIONS wrote:Fight was closer than Floyd/Maidana 1 ...
The bias the general fan has in boxing is similar to hometown fans rooting for their team.
In a judging sport, that's a bad thing.

No fan on earth is completely unbiased

This post reads like floyd bias, ggg anti bias

I've heard hardly any momentum for a rematch between ggg vs Jacobs

The thing with mayweather is everything's hyped for money. The situation vs Madiana was hyped for the rematch. As the last poster says, both were close fights with the right results

I will never understand why people say Maidana beat Mayweather. He hardly landed clean on him at all, aside from a few body shots early on. It was nice showcase of defensive skill inside the pocket, less running, true grit in there. Then he completely took over after 6. Completly dominated Maidana from then on after Maidana started fatiguing. There was a monumental shift in momementum towards Mayweather, he landed the cleaner harder shots down the stretch and really the whole fight. He beat maidana way better than he did in the second fight where he boxed him. Crap fight the second one, worse still was May Pac and then Berto was the worst. Still, he's one of my favourites. Just was passionless after the Canelo fight/maidana 1 it seems.

lazboy wrote:I will never understand why people say Maidana beat Mayweather. He hardly landed clean on him at all, aside from a few body shots early on. It was nice showcase of defensive skill inside the pocket, less running, true grit in there. Then he completely took over after 6. Completly dominated Maidana from then on after Maidana started fatiguing. There was a monumental shift in momementum towards Mayweather, he landed the cleaner harder shots down the stretch and really the whole fight. He beat maidana way better than he did in the second fight where he boxed him. Crap fight the second one, worse still was May Pac and then Berto was the worst. Still, he's one of my favourites. Just was passionless after the Canelo fight/maidana 1 it seems.

The simple answer is so FMJ could get away with rematching a popular fighter who was no real threat to him.

Ossyrules wrote:

BAD INTENTIONS wrote:Fight was closer than Floyd/Maidana 1 ...
The bias the general fan has in boxing is similar to hometown fans rooting for their team.
In a judging sport, that's a bad thing.

No fan on earth is completely unbiased

This post reads like floyd bias, ggg anti bias

I've heard hardly any momentum for a rematch between ggg vs Jacobs

The thing with mayweather is everything's hyped for money. The situation vs Madiana was hyped for the rematch. As the last poster says, both were close fights with the right results

He's anti all things white.

crow wrote:Gennady can make 3 times his Jacobs purse vs Eubank Jr.

No, just no! That is a preposterous claim!

And didn't all of the extreme hardcore GGG fans persistently claim that Golovkin chases legacy over money, which is the reason why he insists on remaining in his 160lbs comfort zone, despite his team claiming that no man from 154lbs to 175lbs is capable of beating him?

Tanzio wrote:

lazboy wrote:I will never understand why people say Maidana beat Mayweather. He hardly landed clean on him at all, aside from a few body shots early on. It was nice showcase of defensive skill inside the pocket, less running, true grit in there. Then he completely took over after 6. Completly dominated Maidana from then on after Maidana started fatiguing. There was a monumental shift in momementum towards Mayweather, he landed the cleaner harder shots down the stretch and really the whole fight. He beat maidana way better than he did in the second fight where he boxed him. Crap fight the second one, worse still was May Pac and then Berto was the worst. Still, he's one of my favourites. Just was passionless after the Canelo fight/maidana 1 it seems.

The simple answer is so FMJ could get away with rematching a popular fighter who was no real threat to him.

Mayweather did absolutely nothing for the first six rounds.

Ossyrules wrote:

BAD INTENTIONS wrote:Fight was closer than Floyd/Maidana 1 ...
The bias the general fan has in boxing is similar to hometown fans rooting for their team.
In a judging sport, that's a bad thing.

No fan on earth is completely unbiased

This post reads like floyd bias, ggg anti bias

I've heard hardly any momentum for a rematch between ggg vs Jacobs

The thing with mayweather is everything's hyped for money. The situation vs Madiana was hyped for the rematch. As the last poster says, both were close fights with the right results

Biases don't mean you can't be partial.

greg wrote:

caldo2025 wrote:Jacobs had 12 rounds to do it and couldn't get it done. If the fight were a money maker then it would be another thing or if there were a rematch clause as well. Move on people.

This is better for Jacobs anyway because now he can go on for six fights claiming that he beat GGG and would defeat him in a rematch instead of fighting him again immediately and getting his head knocked off. Because that is what will happen in the rematch.

..I agree ..everyone did a good job..time to move on..

Anytime where some people thought the other side won there should be a rematch. There are people who believe Jacobs won. Regardless if you disagree. If that's the case Kovalev-Ward shouldn't rematch either.

world ranked wrote:

greg wrote:

caldo2025 wrote:Jacobs had 12 rounds to do it and couldn't get it done. If the fight were a money maker then it would be another thing or if there were a rematch clause as well. Move on people.

This is better for Jacobs anyway because now he can go on for six fights claiming that he beat GGG and would defeat him in a rematch instead of fighting him again immediately and getting his head knocked off. Because that is what will happen in the rematch.

..I agree ..everyone did a good job..time to move on..

Anytime where some people thought the other side won there should be a rematch. There are people who believe Jacobs won. Regardless if you disagree. If that's the case Kovalev-Ward shouldn't rematch either.

I hope that this is a facetious post. You do understand that there are people who think the loser won in nearly every relatively close decision in the history of boxing, right?

Tanzio wrote:

world ranked wrote:

greg wrote: ..I agree ..everyone did a good job..time to move on..

Anytime where some people thought the other side won there should be a rematch. There are people who believe Jacobs won. Regardless if you disagree. If that's the case Kovalev-Ward shouldn't rematch either.

I hope that this is a facetious post. You do understand that there are people who think the loser won in nearly every relatively close decision in the history of boxing, right?

Yeah and most probably needed a rematch.

world ranked wrote:

Tanzio wrote:

world ranked wrote:
Anytime where some people thought the other side won there should be a rematch. There are people who believe Jacobs won. Regardless if you disagree. If that's the case Kovalev-Ward shouldn't rematch either.

I hope that this is a facetious post. You do understand that there are people who think the loser won in nearly every relatively close decision in the history of boxing, right?

Yeah and most probably needed a rematch.

Tanzio wrote:

world ranked wrote:

Tanzio wrote: I hope that this is a facetious post. You do understand that there are people who think the loser won in nearly every relatively close decision in the history of boxing, right?

Yeah and most probably needed a rematch.

I don't understand why that's funny. You can make a case any recent close fights need or should have rematch.

These guys fight once or twice a year. You're basically proposing Ward/Kovalev fight each other every June and November until they retire.

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:These guys fight once or twice a year. You're basically proposing Ward/Kovalev fight each other every June and November until they retire.

The second fight of any fight is not guaranteed to be close. A competive fight multiple times like Ward-Kovalev is much better than a Ward-Paul Smith or Kovalev-Mohemmedi matches. You guys acting like these guys are facing elite comp every fight 90 percent of these fight are already predetermine so lets act like we stopping other big fights from happening.

What if they're all close? Ward/kovalev 9 on ppv? Lol