Re: Boycott Bunces Book
Posted: 13 Jun 2017, 10:32
I’m in the ‘Buncey is a good egg’ camp!
Always been more than helpful and accommodating to myself.
Always been more than helpful and accommodating to myself.
boxingknockout wrote:I bet you're going to tell us you also don't know about the Tyson - Green incident or the 'supposed' Atlas-Tyson situation as well! ?CaptainSpacerod wrote:Not meChippo wrote:
Thought everyone knew about this incident?
Did you start following boxing because of Amir Khan or Anthony Joshua?![]()
I got in to boxing because of Eubank, Benn, Naz even an early Joe Calzaghe. Most kids in the gym around that particular time were there because of Naz to be fair. I knew about the Tyson Green and Tyson Atlas tales only because I've read Tysons book.littlekinny wrote:boxingknockout wrote:I bet you're going to tell us you also don't know about the Tyson - Green incident or the 'supposed' Atlas-Tyson situation as well! ?CaptainSpacerod wrote:
Not me
Did you start following boxing because of Amir Khan or Anthony Joshua?![]()
Why are you laughing at him? Because you potentially knew something he didn't?
What does it matter if he started following boxing due to Anthony Joshua or amir khan? I don't understand what's funny about someone not acting like they know everything and remarking on an infamous incident saying he didn't know about it?
No wonder new people refrain from posting when they are ridiculed for not being as informed a's an 'expert' .
Go ahead and laugh at me for mcguigan naz and eubank getting me into boxing.
Anyway educate us on who got you into boxing . So next time I'm asked instead of being honest I can give the cool answer and no-one will laugh at me.
So you coming over and acting the judge, jury, policeman, and executioner and mocking others for starting a thread about a legitimate talking point and controversial figure is "civilised" behaviour.....just because Bunce wrote a book and you wrote a book doesn't mean there is some unwritten rule that all authors are good guys with altruistic motivations.....I bought your Sibson book a few years ago...and it is clear it was a labour of love...what it lacked in writing skills it made up for with passion and commitment...and it was a good worthwhile read.....I cant claim to have written a book....but I have written countless published professional papers in my career for a Royal Chartered institute over the last 17 years........a report or book is only as good as its author and your "one size fits all approach" is not very helpful.....If you want to leave that's entirely up to you but you will find the same people on other forums under different user names...when was this utopia of serious posters? I have been on boxing forums for 18 years going back to the doghouseboxing and boxing insider days....when I post here I accept there is a more ...how shall we put it twitter style of posting.....wheras the other place I mainly post boxing 24 has a far more in depth analysis....but disagreements and even barbs being traded take place everywhere......perhaps try and be a little more broadminded and respect others views because what you have done by posting what you did and the manner in which you did it.....is exactly what you are complaining about..you may be used to getting your own way having been a career policeman but this board is a democracy...... You act as if it is news to you that Bunce is a controversial figure....and have taken this authors united thing far too personally....we wouldn't trash your book or anyone elses book....or their motives for it...especially when they have just finished it and are publishing it.....with Bunce and the cynical methods he has employed so far to promote it as I have already outlined (using a errol Christie obituary to plug it 3 times- the boxing news article- ).....and the fact that he arrogantly thinks he is uniquely qualified to write and comment on the sport....that is the reason for this thread. He is imo a thoroughly nasty piece of work. I have liked his onscreen persona at times over the years but it has become more and more of a caricature especially the last 18 months.....and has resulted in more and more boorish behaviour...dalcumly wrote:There seems to be an increasing number of morons on boxrec. This used to be a forum where serious boxing matters were discussed in a civilised manner.
To come on here and slate the author of a boxing book in such a manner suggests there's a 'background' somewhere.
Some of these threads have become pathetic. I don't even fully understand what a 'troll' is but I strongly suspect there are half a dozen 'wasters' have started to bring down this website. I reckon there's dozens of real boxing people have begun to switch off.
I guarantee I'll be attacked now. They can say what the want, I'm off elsewhere.
I'm a big fan of Eddie Hearn, boxing doesn't interest me reallyboxingknockout wrote: Did you start following boxing because of Amir Khan or Anthony Joshua?![]()
Well saidlittlekinny wrote:
Why are you laughing at him? Because you potentially knew something he didn't?
What does it matter if he started following boxing due to Anthony Joshua or amir khan? I don't understand what's funny about someone not acting like they know everything and remarking on an infamous incident saying he didn't know about it?
No wonder new people refrain from posting when they are ridiculed for not being as informed a's an 'expert' .
Go ahead and laugh at me for mcguigan naz and eubank getting me into boxing.
Anyway educate us on who got you into boxing . So next time I'm asked instead of being honest I can give the cool answer and no-one will laugh at me.
if its swearing and foul language you object to, you cant have enjoyed attending too many boxing shows the last 30-40 years. I first attended small bills courtesy of my dad in the early 1980s..... everything from the York hall,the Royal Albert Hall, Wembley and even Bowlers nightclub Windsor back in 1987 when Barry Michael lost his world title.....there has usually been lots of profanity and drunkenness .the Albert Hall notwithstanding.....british boxing has hardly ever been some German like bastion of dinner jackets and fans sitting quietly to applaud a jab over dinner........its always been raucous going back to our Enery....I attended Bruno_Witherspoon as a youngster forced to attend in the wee hours by my dad and I vividly recall a fan shouting out repeatedly "kill the black bbastard Frank"....and the same fan being in drunken despair when Frank got knocked out............in a sense Bunce is the beacon of all that you dislike in your post above.....he was once someone who spoke and wrote about boxing quietly and seriously.....I mean look at him on Boxing First or Audley era BBC.......it was only after he got the setanta gigs that the loudmouth,screaming hysterical and abusive fat man in an exploding suit with all the banalities u evidently dislike...was born ..........its irrelevant how many copies of the book he sells....that's not the point.....the point which you are missing as you are blinded by a sense of authors must stick together .....is that Bunce, rather than go down the traditional manner of selling a book, has chosen to be loud and vulgar and market his book as the authoritative british boxing bible mainly as its written by him.....and as one BIG F YOU to all the forum posters and online fans who quote "attend boxing matches in their thousands and write up fight reports for websites" but "don't know what theyre talking about"and Im the big daddy Bunce the bert sugar of the british boxing scene and this book is proof of that...that's how the book is being marketed and that's evidently his motivation for writing it , its not a financial thing its a labour of ego.....his whole raison d'etre behind writing the book appears to be that he is uniquely qualified to comment on the british fight scene since the 1970s.......and that forum posters/online writers don't know anythingdalcumly wrote:It's not just the biased and outrageous opinions. It's the language. Over the last few weeks I've read posts about drug taking, slagging off ex-wives, perverted sex, and persistent swearing.
I can swear like the rest of them, we all can, the difference is we choose not to. I don't really want to read about ' going down the pub on Saturday night for some 'Charlie' and my 'fat ex ' leaving the kids with me and I certainly don't want to read what Bunce or anyone else did with prostitutes. That's my point.
You know Bunce isn't going to get rich with this book. It is a book for general boxing fans, and there's not many about. What we have now is 'fans of boxers' so a book on Joshua or McGuigan or Froch will outsell Bunce's type of book, because they will be bought by fans AND the general boxing public. He'll be very lucky to sell 1,000 copies and most have already been discounted. I'll buy it though,and I'm sure I'll form an opinion when I've finished.
I'm a bit of a forum lurker.Metal Fingers wrote:Instead of berating someone for not knowing about Larry's WWE moment, here is a link to a clip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5zlQqSCzRrA. Holmes would out-jab you, do you on the cards, buy your home and kick you out, then buy the local laundry shop and refuse to let you wash your smalls, and if all that failed he'd drop kick you from a car. That is why he is the best heavyweight we've ever seen.
mickey1975 wrote:We run celebs off this forum, no messing.
Fair enough.... Hearn invented British boxingCaptainSpacerod wrote:I'm a big fan of Eddie Hearn, boxing doesn't interest me reallyboxingknockout wrote: Did you start following boxing because of Amir Khan or Anthony Joshua?![]()
He got a shock. As did Smigga, who was mentally ruined.Counter-puncher wrote:mickey1975 wrote:We run celebs off this forum, no messing.Boomer was clearly amazed anyone would dare to step to
When I go off I really go, I scare myself sometimesmickey1975 wrote:He got a shock. As did Smigga, who was mentally ruined.Counter-puncher wrote:mickey1975 wrote:We run celebs off this forum, no messing.Boomer was clearly amazed anyone would dare to step to
Nailed it.Black Sam Bellamy wrote:Embarrassing thread. Poster doesn't like Bunce and thinks we should boycott his book. Sad.
Ever heard of irony you pair of titts? Evidently not....the thread title is a play on the bring back bunce campaign......if you want embarrassing that was it. I realise you have a hard on for bunce spacerod but pleasectry to contain your feelingsCaptainSpacerod wrote:Nailed it.Black Sam Bellamy wrote:Embarrassing thread. Poster doesn't like Bunce and thinks we should boycott his book. Sad.
He comes across as childish, jealous and embittered with his faux outrage at Bunce for the shocking crime of ....... being rude to people on forums.
Then with absolutely no self awareness and without a hint of irony proceeds to ....... be rude to people on forums
Comedy gold