BoxRec

jamamb wrote: ↑18 Jan 2019, 19:38

tiny_acres wrote: ↑18 Jan 2019, 19:36 I find it funny how some boxers are defended and people say wait until all of the evidence comes out.

While others are found automatically guilty in the eyes of the public. No trial just guilty.

I guess it just goes by who your favorites are

most times when its a high profile boxer i see both positions taken on the same guy (just like here),, most guys have some who like them and some who dont

jamamb wrote: ↑18 Jan 2019, 19:43 lol anyone specific in mind in this thread

tiny_acres wrote: ↑18 Jan 2019, 19:41

jamamb wrote: ↑18 Jan 2019, 19:38

tiny_acres wrote: ↑18 Jan 2019, 19:36 I find it funny how some boxers are defended and people say wait until all of the evidence comes out.

While others are found automatically guilty in the eyes of the public. No trial just guilty.

I guess it just goes by who your favorites are

most times when its a high profile boxer i see both positions taken on the same guy (just like here),, most guys have some who like them and some who dont

I understand people who will choose a side. But I wish they were consistent in their opinions.
It just goes by their favorite fighters and not similar situations

oogiebe wrote: ↑18 Jan 2019, 19:46

tiny_acres wrote: ↑18 Jan 2019, 19:41

jamamb wrote: ↑18 Jan 2019, 19:38

most times when its a high profile boxer i see both positions taken on the same guy (just like here),, most guys have some who like them and some who dont

I understand people who will choose a side. But I wish they were consistent in their opinions.
It just goes by their favorite fighters and not similar situations

You know it will never change for most people who don't see the hypocrisy. Simply put, if he's guilty, he should be punished, if he's not, then he won't. I'm just really not surprised.

jamamb wrote: ↑18 Jan 2019, 19:46 just curious who and what the other cases were to make them inconsistent, u need other alleged assaults they commented on for them to be hypocrites

tiny_acres wrote: ↑18 Jan 2019, 19:47

oogiebe wrote: ↑18 Jan 2019, 19:46

tiny_acres wrote: ↑18 Jan 2019, 19:41

I understand people who will choose a side. But I wish they were consistent in their opinions.
It just goes by their favorite fighters and not similar situations

You know it will never change for most people who don't see the hypocrisy. Simply put, if he's guilty, he should be punished, if he's not, then he won't. I'm just really not surprised.

Very little surprises me in this sport. Most boxers are not choir boys

oogiebe wrote: ↑18 Jan 2019, 19:51

tiny_acres wrote: ↑18 Jan 2019, 19:47

oogiebe wrote: ↑18 Jan 2019, 19:46
You know it will never change for most people who don't see the hypocrisy. Simply put, if he's guilty, he should be punished, if he's not, then he won't. I'm just really not surprised.

Very little surprises me in this sport. Most boxers are not choir boys

At this point in my life, the only sports star I'd be surprised to hear something negative about is Derek Jeter.

oogiebe wrote: ↑18 Jan 2019, 19:49

jamamb wrote: ↑18 Jan 2019, 19:46 just curious who and what the other cases were to make them inconsistent, u need other alleged assaults they commented on for them to be hypocrites

If you're asking me, I haven't the feintest idea. I'm just commenting on Tiny's post. In general, that's what people do. They defend the folks they like and convict those they don't. What's so surprising?

jamamb wrote: ↑18 Jan 2019, 20:31

oogiebe wrote: ↑18 Jan 2019, 19:49

jamamb wrote: ↑18 Jan 2019, 19:46 just curious who and what the other cases were to make them inconsistent, u need other alleged assaults they commented on for them to be hypocrites

If you're asking me, I haven't the feintest idea. I'm just commenting on Tiny's post. In general, that's what people do. They defend the folks they like and convict those they don't. What's so surprising?

tinys saying ppl here are being hypocrites so i just want to know who and on which cases, simples

jamamb wrote: ↑18 Jan 2019, 22:12 which posters in this thread are being inconsistent with kov compared to others ? im curious

tiny_acres wrote: ↑18 Jan 2019, 22:19

jamamb wrote: ↑18 Jan 2019, 22:12 which posters in this thread are being inconsistent with kov compared to others ? im curious

Caldo for instance started a thread once on how can Floyd be allowed to box since he beat women.

There are numerous instances of these double standards brought into play by various posters.

My question to you is why you have to question anything and everything I post. You quote me in negative light more than all other posters have combined.

If I have ever done or said something to offend you I assure you it was unintentional. I'm just here to talk boxing not get into a pissing contest

oogiebe wrote: ↑18 Jan 2019, 22:21

tiny_acres wrote: ↑18 Jan 2019, 22:19

jamamb wrote: ↑18 Jan 2019, 22:12 which posters in this thread are being inconsistent with kov compared to others ? im curious

Caldo for instance started a thread once on how can Floyd be allowed to box since he beat women.

There are numerous instances of these double standards brought into play by various posters.

My question to you is why you have to question anything and everything I post. You quote me in negative light more than all other posters have combined.

If I have ever done or said something to offend you I assure you it was unintentional. I'm just here to talk boxing not get into a pissing contest

Don't take that personally. That's Jam's MO. He does it to me too. I think he just wants to see who he can 'draw into' his lair.

tiny_acres wrote: ↑18 Jan 2019, 22:25

oogiebe wrote: ↑18 Jan 2019, 22:21

tiny_acres wrote: ↑18 Jan 2019, 22:19

Caldo for instance started a thread once on how can Floyd be allowed to box since he beat women.

There are numerous instances of these double standards brought into play by various posters.

My question to you is why you have to question anything and everything I post. You quote me in negative light more than all other posters have combined.

If I have ever done or said something to offend you I assure you it was unintentional. I'm just here to talk boxing not get into a pissing contest

Don't take that personally. That's Jam's MO. He does it to me too. I think he just wants to see who he can 'draw into' his lair.

I just don't want to get into any pissing contest. I enjoy having a debate. I just don't like being called out as a liar when anyone who has been here for any length of time can see the hypocrisy on some members posts.
Hell you are my favorite poster here Oogbie and we disagree lots of times

oogiebe wrote: ↑18 Jan 2019, 22:21

tiny_acres wrote: ↑18 Jan 2019, 22:19

jamamb wrote: ↑18 Jan 2019, 22:12 which posters in this thread are being inconsistent with kov compared to others ? im curious

Caldo for instance started a thread once on how can Floyd be allowed to box since he beat women.

There are numerous instances of these double standards brought into play by various posters.

My question to you is why you have to question anything and everything I post. You quote me in negative light more than all other posters have combined.

If I have ever done or said something to offend you I assure you it was unintentional. I'm just here to talk boxing not get into a pissing contest

Don't take that personally. That's Jam's MO. He does it to me too. I think he just wants to see who he can 'draw into' his lair.

jamamb wrote: ↑19 Jan 2019, 01:46 lol bruhs, its just asking a few questions, turns out it was answered easy enough in the end, nothing on an internet forum is serious business and were all fight game brothers, even mexi fool

tiny_acres wrote: ↑18 Jan 2019, 19:41

jamamb wrote: ↑18 Jan 2019, 19:38

tiny_acres wrote: ↑18 Jan 2019, 19:36 I find it funny how some boxers are defended and people say wait until all of the evidence comes out.

While others are found automatically guilty in the eyes of the public. No trial just guilty.

I guess it just goes by who your favorites are

most times when its a high profile boxer i see both positions taken on the same guy (just like here),, most guys have some who like them and some who dont

I understand people who will choose a side. But I wish they were consistent in their opinions.
It just goes by their favorite fighters and not similar situations

jamamb wrote: ↑19 Jan 2019, 01:46 lol bruhs, its just asking a few questions, turns out it was answered easy enough in the end, nothing on an internet forum is serious business and were all fight game brothers, even mexi fool

greg wrote: ↑19 Jan 2019, 06:30 ..Kovalev has been charged with assault with a deadly weapon...I wonder what kind? was this deadly weapon necessary? ..did the police qualify his fists as deadly?...anyway, I heard nothing over the last 6 months, I guess I'll survive for the next couple of months till the trial comes and we'll hopefully find out what exactly happened or didn't happen...

oogiebe wrote: ↑19 Jan 2019, 11:22

greg wrote: ↑19 Jan 2019, 06:30 ..Kovalev has been charged with assault with a deadly weapon...I wonder what kind? was this deadly weapon necessary? ..did the police qualify his fists as deadly?...anyway, I heard nothing over the last 6 months, I guess I'll survive for the next couple of months till the trial comes and we'll hopefully find out what exactly happened or didn't happen...

Yeah, being a pro boxer, his hands are considered deadly/lethal weapons.