Re: Eubank SR tears BJS, high praise for Dean Francis
Posted: 21 Dec 2020, 11:19
I did at the time, and as that link proves, not a single person (other than you apparently) was claiming he was garbage. You're really clutching at straws here...coghaugen11 wrote: ↑21 Dec 2020, 07:44He looked absolute garbage to me. Just watch the fights.Deserter wrote: ↑21 Dec 2020, 06:53Funny how barely a single respected boxing journalist or insider was saying that before the fight. Clearly you have unique gifts of insightcoghaugen11 wrote: ↑21 Dec 2020, 00:47 Lacy looked absolutely awful in most of his fights pre-Calzaghe. Terrible.![]()
And just to be clear, you only need to read this poll of BS contributors to see the evidence of how seasoned observers rated Lacy:
https://www.BS.com/BS
They must be blind then.Deserter wrote: ↑21 Dec 2020, 11:19I did at the time, and as that link proves, not a single person (other than you apparently) was claiming he was garbage. You're really clutching at straws here...coghaugen11 wrote: ↑21 Dec 2020, 07:44He looked absolute garbage to me. Just watch the fights.Deserter wrote: ↑21 Dec 2020, 06:53
Funny how barely a single respected boxing journalist or insider was saying that before the fight. Clearly you have unique gifts of insight![]()
And just to be clear, you only need to read this poll of BS contributors to see the evidence of how seasoned observers rated Lacy:
https://www.BS.com/BS
It was at super middle. Or are we now rewriting history where it was at a higher weight where he lost but would still be good enough to beat the greatest 168lber this country produced?
orbtastic wrote: ↑21 Dec 2020, 11:28It was at super middle. Or are we now rewriting history where it was at a higher weight where he lost but would still be good enough to beat the greatest 168lber this country produced?
You really need help. You have been at this Eubank obsession for years now, weaving in half truths and made up facts to suit your weird little obsessive narratives.
No, he doesn’t. He said it was a great test, a tough learning fight that he knew he won easily.coghaugen11 wrote: ↑21 Dec 2020, 11:17He describes it as the worst experience of his life.mickey1975 wrote: ↑21 Dec 2020, 10:46 A young Joe knew he had to be on his game with Eubank, and won easily.
Always helps your credibility when you say that former fighters, expert commentators and analysts must all have been blindcoghaugen11 wrote: ↑21 Dec 2020, 11:20 They must be blind then.
Buncey predicted Joe would win every minute of every round.
Deserter wrote: ↑21 Dec 2020, 12:23Always helps your credibility when you say that former fighters, expert commentators and analysts must all have been blindcoghaugen11 wrote: ↑21 Dec 2020, 11:20 They must be blind then.
Buncey predicted Joe would win every minute of every round.![]()
You prat.mickey1975 wrote: ↑21 Dec 2020, 11:45No, he doesn’t. He said it was a great test, a tough learning fight that he knew he won easily.coghaugen11 wrote: ↑21 Dec 2020, 11:17He describes it as the worst experience of his life.mickey1975 wrote: ↑21 Dec 2020, 10:46 A young Joe knew he had to be on his game with Eubank, and won easily.
According to Bunce himself he said it. Might be fibbing but still. It was blatantly obvious Lacy wasn’t very good, just watch him fight!Deserter wrote: ↑21 Dec 2020, 12:23Always helps your credibility when you say that former fighters, expert commentators and analysts must all have been blindcoghaugen11 wrote: ↑21 Dec 2020, 11:20 They must be blind then.
Buncey predicted Joe would win every minute of every round.![]()
As for Bunce, your half-truths are emerging once more, as he actually said this:
"Calzaghe will win it. Lacy hasn't beaten anybody who's been anywhere near their best. He's the American idol but he's really not that special. Hopefully Joe has enough left and has not left it too late for the big fight."
So yes, he tipped Calzaghe, but was clearly concerned that he may be wrong and Calzaghe could unravel because of age. He clearly didn't say what you claimed he did, but why let truth get in the way of your stories, eh?![]()
Stop trolling chat forums on the World Wide Web. Little boy.Steveh583 wrote: ↑21 Dec 2020, 13:03Deserter wrote: ↑21 Dec 2020, 12:23Always helps your credibility when you say that former fighters, expert commentators and analysts must all have been blindcoghaugen11 wrote: ↑21 Dec 2020, 11:20 They must be blind then.
Buncey predicted Joe would win every minute of every round.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Hmmm. Maybe there were some kind of weight problems then, I recalled it being at light heavyorbtastic wrote: ↑21 Dec 2020, 11:28It was at super middle. Or are we now rewriting history where it was at a higher weight where he lost but would still be good enough to beat the greatest 168lber this country produced?
You really need help. You have been at this Eubank obsession for years now, weaving in half truths and made up facts to suit your weird little obsessive narratives.
Young Eubankcoghaugen11 wrote: ↑21 Dec 2020, 13:18Apparently so, Teddy Atlas mentioned it once and Eubank did very well apparently with his jab?
What fight were you watching? He looked great. Destroying solid contenders like Pemberton, Vanderpool and Robin Reid with ease hence why he was favourite. Post Calzaghe was another story. That fight legitimately ruined him.coghaugen11 wrote: ↑21 Dec 2020, 00:47 Lacy looked absolutely awful in most of his fights pre-Calzaghe. Terrible.
You can’t be easy to hit against Dean Francis of all people.rio wrote: ↑23 Dec 2020, 21:31What fight were you watching? He looked great. Destroying solid contenders like Pemberton, Vanderpool and Robin Reid with ease hence why he was favourite. Post Calzaghe was another story. That fight legitimately ruined him.coghaugen11 wrote: ↑21 Dec 2020, 00:47 Lacy looked absolutely awful in most of his fights pre-Calzaghe. Terrible.
And no version of Dean Francis would have touched Joe. Hes easy one of the top 3 brits of all time.