Posted: 22 Jun 2007, 11:26
Get Calzaghe fight in Cardiff that be great night. With good undercard, i reckon 50,000 could go.
BoxRec
Boxingchats Question Time
Page 3 of 7
Posted: 22 Jun 2007, 11:38
BC, any ideas whats going on with Audley?? Has he hung em up?
Posted: 22 Jun 2007, 11:44
BC gets a lot of stick but generally fights his corner, and has to be respected for his comments on this thread.
Posted: 22 Jun 2007, 11:46
Get a lot of practice with all that in Brighton I betTerry D wrote:Eh? Was thats 'Hams it up a treat'?DG. wrote:boxingchat wrote: Yes, he rams it up there a treat!!!
Thought so!
Posted: 22 Jun 2007, 11:59
Brighton not all full of puffs!!
Posted: 22 Jun 2007, 12:02
BC - will SN's July shows be on TV and if so what station??
Posted: 22 Jun 2007, 12:13
But we're all on here because we like watching semi naked men bash each other in the rung huh?leforge wrote:Brighton not all full of puffs!!
Posted: 22 Jun 2007, 12:15
Very amusing.
Posted: 22 Jun 2007, 14:04
Thanks for the insight to all the Qs Boxingchat, its always good to hear the inside storyboxingchat wrote:1. IMO 80%Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:BOXINGCHAP whats the current situation with Calazage-Kessler and what percentage chance would you give of us seeing the fight before the end of the year?
Also which opponents seem likely for Amir Khan after Limmond assuming he wins?
Could Amir Khan make 130lbs for a 1 off title fight and would SN encourage him to fight for a title at 130?
Also which of SNs 126-135lb fighters look likely to square off in the near future and how does SN see those rivalries turning out?
Thanks for any replys Boxingchat
2. Earl Maybe.
3. IMO No Chance
4. Cook, Matthews, Foster, Morris, Mitchell, Burns etc all great possibilities and all very interesting fights If I had to say who would come out on top? At the moment. Cook probably.
Do you like working at SN in the boxing promotions business and whats your job there? Or would that be giving away too much?
Posted: 22 Jun 2007, 14:34
Oh dear - not going too well on the TV front is it.............What no exclusive?? off to Setanta is it?? tut tut Oh dear Oh dear.boxingchat wrote:Mind your own business, don't lose sleep on Warren's behalf.Punchy Joe wrote:QUESTION 2: when's the announcement on the new TV deal??
Oh and I sleep well whatever happens mate, bet you do too all that tea youve gotta make haha.
Posted: 22 Jun 2007, 14:41
Just wanted to say that I didnt mean anything offensive in starting this thread, it was just that I saw lots of posts and questions being asked that maybe you did not see or have time to reply to.... thanks for being (allegedly) straight with us (sorry, couldnt resist)...boxingchat wrote:Me too, so get off my case. Church Road, Hove. Goldstone regular for many years since the days of Towner etc.leforge wrote:I dont think he to blame for the problems, fighters are equally to blame. Look at Hatton prime example he turned down fight with Mayweather.
I got an Albion season ticket.
Two follow ups from me....
1. thought you said you were a West Ham fan?
2. RE: Thaxton vs Earl.... you say EARL told Hennesy he was not happy with the terms of the bid.... a) do you/FW know what these concerns were? b) can you reveal them to us? c) do you/FW consider them justified?
(And no, they were not in last weeks NOTW, but I did not see the story on the net till Tuesday/Wednesday I think (whenever I started the topic) so i didnt know if there would be any comment on that....)
oh and 3.... how would you compare Haye and his not fighting Enzo to Earl and his not fighting Thaxton?
Posted: 22 Jun 2007, 14:49
Wasn't Earl quoted as turning down 40k to fight Khan? What would the improved offer (roughly) be to get him to change his mind? or wqould the prospect of C/Wealth belt be sufficient?boxingchat wrote:1. IMO 80%Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:BOXINGCHAP whats the current situation with Calazage-Kessler and what percentage chance would you give of us seeing the fight before the end of the year?
Also which opponents seem likely for Amir Khan after Limmond assuming he wins?
Could Amir Khan make 130lbs for a 1 off title fight and would SN encourage him to fight for a title at 130?
Also which of SNs 126-135lb fighters look likely to square off in the near future and how does SN see those rivalries turning out?
Thanks for any replys Boxingchat
2. Earl Maybe.
3. IMO No Chance
4. Cook, Matthews, Foster, Morris, Mitchell, Burns etc all great possibilities and all very interesting fights If I had to say who would come out on top? At the moment. Cook probably.
Once again fair play to you BC.... as much as you do get stick on here, it is nice to talk to insiders, especialy when they impart info and gossip..... possibly you dont realise that when we dont hear the background to things going wrong, we have to deduce it.... when that process goes awry, you come out with comments like 'thank god for all your insight' and that leaves me for one thinking it would be more neighbourly to maybe give your version of events....
Heres a deal, I give you advice on kitchen fitting, you let us know the inside track, lol
j/k mate, this kitchen fitting stuff is a closely guarded secret!
Posted: 22 Jun 2007, 15:15
True, Hatton has been very contradicting when It comes to topics like Witter.
Like saying Witter would have to win a world title and still won't even though Junior won one!
Like saying Witter would have to win a world title and still won't even though Junior won one!
Posted: 22 Jun 2007, 15:34
~ MIKEE ~ wrote: 1. thought you said you were a West Ham fan?
He said he was a season ticket holder there too!!! Sorry about the pikey comment by the way, I have plenty of Hammers as friends....
Posted: 22 Jun 2007, 16:07
Good stuff, Boxing chat. For all I disagree with much of your opinions and think you sometimes come across as a paranoid sychophant, I think it's pretty ballsy of you to answer the thread. Cracking effort, and if, as it seems, you have a working relationship in SN, it's a good thing for the forum.
Anyway, I'd like to ask how Frank feels about Amir Khan's progress. I know we'll get something close to the party line, but I'm interested to know your opinion and, if you know, how Frank feels.
I'd also like to know what his plans for Amir are. I think Limond is a step in the right direction, and I have never been as critical as others about Amir's opponents, given his sometimes amateurish technique and young age. But while Limond is a step up in class, he's still a bit of matchmaking with it's roots firmly placed in expediency, as I think most erudite observers realise.
Are there any plans to test Khan with some tough, hardened, stronger journeymen to steel him for the big time?
Oooh, I suppose that's two questions.
Anyway, I'd like to ask how Frank feels about Amir Khan's progress. I know we'll get something close to the party line, but I'm interested to know your opinion and, if you know, how Frank feels.
I'd also like to know what his plans for Amir are. I think Limond is a step in the right direction, and I have never been as critical as others about Amir's opponents, given his sometimes amateurish technique and young age. But while Limond is a step up in class, he's still a bit of matchmaking with it's roots firmly placed in expediency, as I think most erudite observers realise.
Are there any plans to test Khan with some tough, hardened, stronger journeymen to steel him for the big time?
Oooh, I suppose that's two questions.
Posted: 23 Jun 2007, 05:23
Thread of the year. Respect to BoxingChat for his direct replies.
Posted: 23 Jun 2007, 14:59
He has only really answered a couple of Qs though and neither gave us any insight - Lets be honest the sack and possibly even a court case, FW v Boxingchat, is going to put him off being honest and quoting FWs opinion - I dont really read his postings to learn anything and given his position of chief gofer you cant expect worthwhile information from the man - The thread was a nice idear though with some good tea and biccy humour so on that basis I enjoyed it.
Posted: 25 Jun 2007, 05:11
Chambers2 wrote:BC, any ideas whats going on with Audley?? Has he hung em up?
No idea, sorry. Don't think he's retired though.
Posted: 25 Jun 2007, 05:13
Fat Gav wrote:BC - will SN's July shows be on TV and if so what station??
Don't worry they'll be televised. Watch this space!
Posted: 25 Jun 2007, 05:38
Agreed, the statement in seperate threads that he is a West Ham season ticket holder and a Brighton season ticket holder (granted, not impossible) also brings some of his credibility into question.wildwaylon wrote:He has only really answered a couple of Qs though and neither gave us any insight - Lets be honest the sack and possibly even a court case, FW v Boxingchat, is going to put him off being honest and quoting FWs opinion - I dont really read his postings to learn anything and given his position of chief gofer you cant expect worthwhile information from the man - The thread was a nice idear though with some good tea and biccy humour so on that basis I enjoyed it.
Posted: 25 Jun 2007, 06:31
Goz wrote:Get a lot of practice with all that in Brighton I betTerry D wrote:Eh? Was thats 'Hams it up a treat'?DG. wrote:
Thought so!
I'm from The straight end!
Posted: 25 Jun 2007, 06:33
Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:Thanks for the insight to all the Qs Boxingchat, its always good to hear the inside storyboxingchat wrote:1. IMO 80%Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:BOXINGCHAP whats the current situation with Calazage-Kessler and what percentage chance would you give of us seeing the fight before the end of the year?
Also which opponents seem likely for Amir Khan after Limmond assuming he wins?
Could Amir Khan make 130lbs for a 1 off title fight and would SN encourage him to fight for a title at 130?
Also which of SNs 126-135lb fighters look likely to square off in the near future and how does SN see those rivalries turning out?
Thanks for any replys Boxingchat
2. Earl Maybe.
3. IMO No Chance
4. Cook, Matthews, Foster, Morris, Mitchell, Burns etc all great possibilities and all very interesting fights If I had to say who would come out on top? At the moment. Cook probably.
Do you like working at SN in the boxing promotions business and whats your job there? Or would that be giving away too much?
I don't work at SN. I'm in the Motor trade. I know people who do though.
Posted: 25 Jun 2007, 06:34
As I said, don't worry and sleep well. Surely if Warren doesn't, as you state, get an exclusive deal the it's the others who need to worry.Punchy Joe wrote:Oh dear - not going too well on the TV front is it.............What no exclusive?? off to Setanta is it?? tut tut Oh dear Oh dear.boxingchat wrote:Mind your own business, don't lose sleep on Warren's behalf.Punchy Joe wrote:QUESTION 2: when's the announcement on the new TV deal??
Oh and I sleep well whatever happens mate, bet you do too all that tea youve gotta make haha.
Posted: 25 Jun 2007, 06:39
SAME, BOTH SHORT-SIGHTED AND DAFT. HAYE WON'T FIGHT MORMECK, IN FACT I DON'T THINK HE WILL SEE CRUISER AGAIN AND FEARS GETTING DE-RAILED IF HE DOES.~ MIKEE ~ wrote:Just wanted to say that I didnt mean anything offensive in starting this thread, it was just that I saw lots of posts and questions being asked that maybe you did not see or have time to reply to.... thanks for being (allegedly) straight with us (sorry, couldnt resist)...boxingchat wrote:Me too, so get off my case. Church Road, Hove. Goldstone regular for many years since the days of Towner etc.leforge wrote:I dont think he to blame for the problems, fighters are equally to blame. Look at Hatton prime example he turned down fight with Mayweather.
I got an Albion season ticket.
Two follow ups from me....
1. thought you said you were a West Ham fan?
MY SONS ARE SO I HAVE TO SUFFER WHEN I CAN'T GET OUT OF IT.
2. RE: Thaxton vs Earl.... you say EARL told Hennesy he was not happy with the terms of the bid.... a) do you/FW know what these concerns were? b) can you reveal them to us? c) do you/FW consider them justified? I THINK IT WAS AN EXCELLENT PURSE OFFER AND EARL IS MAD NOT TO TAKE IT. PERHAPS THERE'S MORE IN A KHAN FIGHT BUT SURELY IF HE'D HAVE BEATEN THAXTON HE WOULD GET MUCH MORE AGAIN. ODD EXCUSE AND HENNESSY RIGHT TO BE PEEVED.
(And no, they were not in last weeks NOTW, but I did not see the story on the net till Tuesday/Wednesday I think (whenever I started the topic) so i didnt know if there would be any comment on that....)
oh and 3.... how would you compare Haye and his not fighting Enzo to Earl and his not fighting Thaxton?
Posted: 25 Jun 2007, 06:41
Carbo wrote:Good stuff, Boxing chat. For all I disagree with much of your opinions and think you sometimes come across as a paranoid sychophant, I think it's pretty ballsy of you to answer the thread. Cracking effort, and if, as it seems, you have a working relationship in SN, it's a good thing for the forum.
Anyway, I'd like to ask how Frank feels about Amir Khan's progress. I know we'll get something close to the party line, but I'm interested to know your opinion and, if you know, how Frank feels.
I'd also like to know what his plans for Amir are. I think Limond is a step in the right direction, and I have never been as critical as others about Amir's opponents, given his sometimes amateurish technique and young age. But while Limond is a step up in class, he's still a bit of matchmaking with it's roots firmly placed in expediency, as I think most erudite observers realise.
Are there any plans to test Khan with some tough, hardened, stronger journeymen to steel him for the big time?
Oooh, I suppose that's two questions.
Khan's on the right track and is getting better. He's still a baby and will get there and deliver when the time is right.
Limond at lightweight will be a very real test.