finally watched the hopkins vs calzaghe fight

DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Post by DG. »

JC won, it says so in the record books.



:TU:
hitman_hatton1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6150
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 20:57

Post by hitman_hatton1 »

DG. wrote:JC won, it says so in the record books.



:TU:
the amount of times i've said that about the hatton-collazo fight.

hypocrite Dennis. :lol:
FLINT ISLAND
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1015
Joined: 10 Feb 2009, 17:12

Calzaghe V Hopkins............Joe was the moral winner !!!!!

Post by FLINT ISLAND »

Calzaghe V Hopkins was a close fight.

Some scored it for Calzaghe.

Some scored it for Hopkins.

However regardless of how people scored the fight - many people use that fight as a way to try and discredit Cazlaghe's career.

That he somehow lost to a old man, etc, etc.

But Calzaghe was the moral winner of that fight - regardless of who you had winning on the scorecard.

First of Hopkins is a bully boy - but he met his match in Calzaghe - he could not bully him or intimadate him despite his best efforts.

Calzaghe had a contempt for Hopkins and refused to give in to him.

Calzaghe was soooooooo relaxed going intot that fight and was caught sleeping when Hopkins felled him in the 1st round.

But then he woke up and for the rest of the 12 rounds - it was Calzaghe who was pushing the fight.

It was Cazlaghe who had the hunger to win and pressure.

Hopkins was a disgrace - holding on Calzaghe like a Octupus - and feigning injury to bide his time.

Its a compliment to Calzaghe that Hopkins had to resort to cheating to get himself through the 12 rounds - he was finding Calzaghes pressure too much and had too take refuge on the floor with his cheating antics.

Hopkins said he would make it look easy - he failed.

Hopkins set out to intimadate and break Calzaghe's heart - he failed.

Hopkins said he would win - he failed.

Calzaghe came through the test - and was clearly the moral victor.

At the post fight press conference Hopkins sounded like a bad loser - refusing to give Calzaghe any credit - and then going off with his tail in between his legs -

For once in his life Bernard Hopkins knew he had met someone in Joe Calzaghe who he had failed to master both psycolgiically and in the boxing ring.

Hopkins despite his age was the NO 1 Light Heavyweight In the World.

Calzaghe went straight to America and fought the NO 1 - full credit to him.

Calzaghe had close tough fight.

But he won the moral battle - 100 % unaminously.
J
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8015
Joined: 17 Feb 2004, 12:39

Re: Calzaghe V Hopkins............Joe was the moral winner !!!!!

Post by J »

great post can you do one how enzo was the moral victor against haye also.

cheers.

:roll: :roll: :roll: :witzend: :witzend:
FLINT ISLAND
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1015
Joined: 10 Feb 2009, 17:12

Re: Calzaghe V Hopkins............Joe was the moral winner !!!!!

Post by FLINT ISLAND »

J wrote:great post can you do one how enzo was the moral victor against haye also.

cheers.

:roll: :roll: :roll: :witzend: :witzend:
Ha

But Joe was also the points winner too

But haters try and make out like he lost by a point or something on the scorecard

The point is - it was a very close fight either way - -----------but Calzaghe was the one who emerged from it with the moral victory
J
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8015
Joined: 17 Feb 2004, 12:39

Re: Calzaghe V Hopkins............Joe was the moral winner !!!!!

Post by J »

sorry for my sarcasm....at then end of the day check the record it donesnt matter what people say there was a big W in the JC corner.

Thats a fact of the matter so anything else to the contrary is subjective conjecture. :TU:
alexpaterson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4310
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 11:22

Re: Calzaghe V Hopkins............Joe was the moral winner !!!!!

Post by alexpaterson »

I had Joe 2 up but Calzaghe was pushing the fight and Hopkins was intent on not letting him get a rythem it was a good tactic as he had no chance if he stood toe to toe with J.C as Calz is so much fitter
FLINT ISLAND
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1015
Joined: 10 Feb 2009, 17:12

Re: Calzaghe V Hopkins............Joe was the moral winner !!!!!

Post by FLINT ISLAND »

agreed

if he stood toe to toe - man to man - Joe would have smashed him up.
Rocky Balboa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1851
Joined: 24 Jan 2004, 16:38

Re: Calzaghe V Hopkins............Joe was the moral winner !!!!!

Post by Rocky Balboa »

J wrote:great post can you do one how enzo was the moral victor against haye also.

cheers.

:roll: :roll: :roll: :witzend: :witzend:

:DDD :DDD :DDD

I personally scored the bout in favour of Hopkins, but I can understand why some thought Calzaghe won! However, there was no way on earth Calzaghe was ever going to grant Hopkins a rematch, no way!

We will never know for sure, but I think Calzaghe knew Hopkins would have probably done more in a rematch!
observer1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1836
Joined: 27 Nov 2007, 22:30

Re: Calzaghe V Hopkins............Joe was the moral winner !!!!!

Post by observer1 »

Joe was Moral winner?
lol?

Taking a dodgy Split Decision against a 44 year old !?

Whatever

Image
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27489
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Calzaghe V Hopkins............Joe was the moral winner !!!!!

Post by stujones »

To quote appolo creed - Joe may have won but he didn't beat him. Hopkins beat him to the punch time and time again, always ended the exchanges and he floored Joe.

Even if you agreed with the score card - what Hopkins said post fight was also true.
jammidodger
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 217
Joined: 19 Nov 2007, 17:06

Re: Calzaghe V Hopkins............Joe was the moral winner !!!!!

Post by jammidodger »

LOL why are people still posting about this? :roll:

Surely just up an old thread if you that bothered??
Roco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 750
Joined: 20 May 2008, 07:30

Re: Calzaghe V Hopkins............Joe was the moral winner !!!!!

Post by Roco »

stujones wrote:To quote appolo creed - Joe may have won but he didn't beat him. Hopkins beat him to the punch time and time again, always ended the exchanges and he floored Joe.

Even if you agreed with the score card - what Hopkins said post fight was also true.
Agreed. Joe was made to miss and look foolish. Hopkins deserved a rematch at the very least.
martin_g91
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 204
Joined: 21 Jul 2009, 05:17

Re: Calzaghe V Hopkins............Joe was the moral winner !!!!!

Post by martin_g91 »

One tried to win it and one tried to nick it. Done.
Captain Hook
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4730
Joined: 07 May 2007, 09:40

Re: Calzaghe V Hopkins............Joe was the moral winner !!!!!

Post by Captain Hook »

jammidodger wrote:LOL why are people still posting about this? :roll:

Surely just up an old thread if you that bothered??


x2
hitman_hatton1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6150
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 20:57

Re: Calzaghe V Hopkins............Joe was the moral winner !!!!!

Post by hitman_hatton1 »

calzaghe won it fair and square.

no running round the ring potshotting all night like hopkins did. :shame:
Twinkle Toes
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3339
Joined: 22 Sep 2003, 08:38

Re: Calzaghe V Hopkins............Joe was the moral winner !!!!!

Post by Twinkle Toes »

martin_g91 wrote:One tried to win it and one tried to nick it. Done.
How true.
alexpaterson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4310
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 11:22

Re: finally watched the hopkins vs calzaghe fight

Post by alexpaterson »

I ha it 1 round to J.C but Hopkins fought the fight he needed too nobody can critice him for that imo
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: finally watched the hopkins vs calzaghe fight

Post by Finn »

alexpaterson wrote:I ha it 1 round to J.C but Hopkins fought the fight he needed too nobody can critice him for that imo

Hopkins knew calzaghe is a counter puncher so adopted a tactic that would spoil and hope to get in the sneaky combos. It was a clever tactic, but i would never applaud someone for fighting dirty and robbing fans of a proper boxing match especially for a title fight.

People make out calzaghe only just beat an old man but in reality if hopkins had come out and boxed he would have been beaten on points at an embarrassing level.

I had calzaghe by 2 and i think he won fair and square, if hopkins had won i wouldnt have said calzaghe was robbed but i would have said what did he do to deserve a win. he didnt come forward he didnt fight he just tried cheating his way to a points victory.

Personally i would have expected a solid light heavy weight to come to a fight and try and knock his opponent out.
Last edited by Finn on 01 Sep 2009, 14:50, edited 1 time in total.
observer1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1836
Joined: 27 Nov 2007, 22:30

Re: finally watched the hopkins vs calzaghe fight

Post by observer1 »

Superheavyweight wrote:I had the fight 6-5-1 Calzaghe with the knockdown making it an even draw, Bhop thought he had the fight won already and let the victory slip in my op, I’d definitely fancy Hopkins in the rematch.
Er.. Enzo thought Hopkins won it too, hence he was telling Joe to go for the KO in the final round lmfao.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22334
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: finally watched the hopkins vs calzaghe fight

Post by Horse »

Superheavyweight wrote:Bhop thought he had the fight won already and let the victory slip in my op, I’d definitely fancy Hopkins in the rematch.
If Hopkins thought that he had the fight won then he is a complete idiot.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re:

Post by Counter-puncher »

hitman_hatton1 wrote:
DG. wrote:JC won, it says so in the record books.



:TU:
the amount of times i've said that about the hatton-collazo fight.

hypocrite Dennis. :lol:
well spotted h_h
Post Reply