BoxRec

ONLy 1 match out there and thats.... REMATCH!

MR UNTOUCHABLE wrote:ONLy 1 match out there and thats.... REMATCH!

Its Two words for that 'crazy matchmaking'

world ranked wrote:Only problem is, finding a world champion who can't fight very well to match him against.

If Nicky Cook could win a title, Amir Khan can find one Yusuke Kobori (WBA Champ) or Joan Guzman if he
beats Campbell, Guzman great boxer hasn't scored a Ko in 4-5 years.[/quote]

Guzman! Are you nuts.

Guzman is one of the best boxer-figthers around. Just because he hasn't scored a knockout for a few years, doesn't mean he can't punch. He would take Khan to school.


When was the last time Guzman been in with a boxer. Now, I'm saying Khan will beat him, but I rather take that
fight than Pacquaio, J. Diaz or Nate. But who's the say Guzman or Campbell will be there if Khan gets a title shot.

That's not to say Khan cannot win a title, but he is going to have to take on someone pretty feather fisted, Campbell and Guzman do not fall into that category.[/quote][/quote]

Khan would get ripped to pieces by Guzman. Simple as. Guzman is very quick, has excellent balance, is a brilliant combination puncher, and is also very very tough. He can brawl is he wants too, and box if he wants to.

Khan has just been destroyed by a hard punching but very inexperienced kid with nothing to suggest he was a future world beater, and you think Khan has a good chance against a highly talented and well schooled multi-weight world champion as a suggested route to an 'easy' title win. Baffling train of thought.

jamesmcdonnell wrote:

world ranked wrote:Only problem is, finding a world champion who can't fight very well to match him against.

If Nicky Cook could win a title, Amir Khan can find one Yusuke Kobori (WBA Champ) or Joan Guzman if he
beats Campbell, Guzman great boxer hasn't scored a Ko in 4-5 years.

Guzman! Are you nuts.

Guzman is one of the best boxer-figthers around. Just because he hasn't scored a knockout for a few years, doesn't mean he can't punch. He would take Khan to school.


When was the last time Guzman been in with a boxer. Now, I'm saying Khan will beat him, but I rather take that
fight than Pacquaio, J. Diaz or Nate. But who's the say Guzman or Campbell will be there if Khan gets a title shot.

That's not to say Khan cannot win a title, but he is going to have to take on someone pretty feather fisted, Campbell and Guzman do not fall into that category.[/quote][/quote]

Khan would get ripped to pieces by Guzman. Simple as. Guzman is very quick, has excellent balance, is a brilliant combination puncher, and is also very very tough. He can brawl is he wants too, and box if he wants to.

Khan has just been destroyed by a hard punching but very inexperienced kid with nothing to suggest he was a future world beater, and you think Khan has a good chance against a highly talented and well schooled multi-weight world champion as a suggested route to an 'easy' title win. Baffling train of thought.[/quote]

I never said he had a good chance to beat Guzman. All I'm saying is if Khan was my fighter I would take going 12 rds
with Guzman for a title than fighting Prescott again and losing and losing any chance of a world title challenger.

He would need a confidence fight first then aim for the British title, he Is domestic level but he won't go any furthur after that.

Guzman wouldn't have to hit hard If Limond could put him down.

world ranked wrote:
I never said he had a good chance to beat Guzman. All I'm saying is if Khan was my fighter I would take going 12 rds
with Guzman for a title than fighting Prescott again and losing and losing any chance of a world title challenger.

Khan should fight Prescot first and then talk about world titles anything less stinks of fraud IMO

Khan has the abilty to box Prescots ears off and use Prescots head as a speed ball

MR UNTOUCHABLE wrote:ONLy 1 match out there and thats.... REMATCH!

its the only way,its the warriors code

classboxer wrote:

world ranked wrote:
I never said he had a good chance to beat Guzman. All I'm saying is if Khan was my fighter I would take going 12 rds
with Guzman for a title than fighting Prescott again and losing and losing any chance of a world title challenger.

Khan should fight Prescot first and then talk about world titles anything less stinks of fraud IMO

Khan has the abilty to box Prescots ears off and use Prescots head as a speed ball

Even if he beats Prescott its already 'stinks of fraud' he's been exposed even if he beats Prescott.

world ranked wrote:

Even if he beats Prescott its already 'stinks of fraud' he's been exposed even if he beats Prescott.

Its hard to ague with that






But hey,Khan can whip Prescot,i am sure of this!

Gethin.

Arthur

Mitchell

Hatton.

classboxer wrote:

MR UNTOUCHABLE wrote:ONLy 1 match out there and thats.... REMATCH!

its the only way,its the warriors code

This is a business, There's no warriors code Its not smart money
to go right back into this fight.

Or Warren could pay Prescott a sackload of cash not to hit so hard in a rematch.

classboxer wrote:

world ranked wrote:

Even if he beats Prescott its already 'stinks of fraud' he's been exposed even if he beats Prescott.

Its hard to ague with that






But hey,Khan can whip Prescot,i am sure of this!

Just as easy Khan can outbox him, Prescott can do a encore performance.

stujones wrote:Gethin.

Arthur

Mitchell

Hatton.

As his matchmaker, you need to have belief that he can, and probably will, win those fights.

it must be thaxton for khan next...

Think he can - with the exception of the last one... which I think is the biggest money fight at the higher level.

stujones wrote:Think he can - with the exception of the last one... which I think is the biggest money fight at the higher level.

I guess it depends when it would happen.

stujones wrote:Think he can - with the exception of the last one... which I think is the biggest money fight at the higher level.

Aren't Mitchell & Arthur @ 130

world ranked wrote:

This is a business, There's no warriors code Its not smart money
to go right back into this fight.

You are paranoid about Khan fighting Prescot again

why is that ?



A True warrior would demand a rematch,i am talking about a warrior,it doesnt matter if you win or lose if you are warrior,all that matters is doing your best and Amir never showed his best against Prescot and thats not good enough!

world ranked wrote:

stujones wrote:Think he can - with the exception of the last one... which I think is the biggest money fight at the higher level.

Aren't Mitchell & Arthur @ 130

There has been loads of talk of Arthur moving up.

boxrec wrote:


The saying "fools rush in" springs to mind..

cowards run from danger

classboxer wrote:

world ranked wrote:

This is a business, There's no warriors code Its not smart money
to go right back into this fight.

You are paranoid about Khan fighting Prescot again

why is that ?



A True warrior would demand a rematch,i am talking about a warrior,it doesnt matter if you win or lose if you are warrior,all that matters is doing your best and Amir never showed his best against Prescot and thats not good enough!

We'll Frank won't let him be a warrior
I bet if he was to defeat Prescott you will think he's a lightweight contender.
If U believe so much in the 'warriors code' will soon fight out if Khan-Prescott 2 will
happen.

After being blown out in such devastating fashion I would draw up his next three as follows:

light puncher
light puncher
light puncher

boxrec wrote:

classboxer wrote:

boxrec wrote:


The saying "fools rush in" springs to mind..

cowards run from danger

Theres nothing cowardly about getting the crap beaten out of you, and accepting that the other man is tougher than you.

If khan is to have a rematch, it would have to be in a few years. Right now he isn't prepared for it.

world ranked wrote:

stujones wrote:Think he can - with the exception of the last one... which I think is the biggest money fight at the higher level.

Aren't Mitchell & Arthur @ 130

They'll move up.