The only change in new ratings version is a damping factor for older bouts. This seems to show most impact to the heavyweights. The heavyweights seem to have lived from relatively old results compared with the welterweights.gregregegg wrote: ↑06 May 2024, 06:12 What changed in the algorithm that absolutely killed the heavyweights?
-wilder vs Hellenise is a 1 star fight..
-parker vs wilder, zhang, AJ, Whyte, chisora all 2 star fights.
but,
-Connor ben vs algeri, dobs, van heerden 3 star
-kongo vs mckinson or ekow 3 star.
There are legit world world world class heavyweight fights that the algorithim is evaluating as less than brittish levle welterweight fights.
Ratings - please read before commenting
-
computerrank
- Editor

- Posts: 2492
- Joined: 04 Jan 2003, 18:59
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
Historically fights are suffering... Ali's highest rated bout is 3 stars...computerrank wrote: ↑06 May 2024, 06:36The only change in new ratings version is a damping factor for older bouts. This seems to show most impact to the heavyweights. The heavyweights seem to have lived from relatively old results compared with the welterweights.gregregegg wrote: ↑06 May 2024, 06:12 What changed in the algorithm that absolutely killed the heavyweights?
-wilder vs Hellenise is a 1 star fight..
-parker vs wilder, zhang, AJ, Whyte, chisora all 2 star fights.
but,
-Connor ben vs algeri, dobs, van heerden 3 star
-kongo vs mckinson or ekow 3 star.
There are legit world world world class heavyweight fights that the algorithim is evaluating as less than brittish levle welterweight fights.
-
computerrank
- Editor

- Posts: 2492
- Joined: 04 Jan 2003, 18:59
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
The rating points level reached differs from time period to time period. The 60s, 70s, 80s showed a low of about 10000 bouts per year. Today we have about 20000 bouts per year. The 30s showed a high of about 30000 bouts per year.
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
Is that explained anywhere? There's no context to these stars across time.computerrank wrote: ↑06 May 2024, 08:20The rating points level reached differs from time period to time period. The 60s, 70s, 80s showed a low of about 10000 bouts per year. Today we have about 20000 bouts per year. The 30s showed a high of about 30000 bouts per year.
Besides, it's still extremely unbelievable to have Ali's greatest fights only at 3.
I highly suggest adjusting the bout numbers to be in context with the time period they're in.
As it stands, fighters are punished or inflated based on factors out of their control (time)
-
computerrank
- Editor

- Posts: 2492
- Joined: 04 Jan 2003, 18:59
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
The rating point limits for the stars are related to the current ratings. See https://boxrec.com/wiki/index.php/BoxRe ... escriptionManrae wrote: ↑06 May 2024, 08:44Is that explained anywhere? There's no context to these stars across time.computerrank wrote: ↑06 May 2024, 08:20The rating points level reached differs from time period to time period. The 60s, 70s, 80s showed a low of about 10000 bouts per year. Today we have about 20000 bouts per year. The 30s showed a high of about 30000 bouts per year.
Besides, it's still extremely unbelievable to have Ali's greatest fights only at 3.
I highly suggest adjusting the bout numbers to be in context with the time period they're in.
As it stands, fighters are punished or inflated based on factors out of their control (time)
It would be possible to determine the ratings point limits for the stars for past time periods too - and to adapt the stars corresponding to the time depending values.
But currently the BoxRec ratings focus in on the current ratings. Maybe such an adaption will be added later.
-
SportsRatings
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 679
- Joined: 26 May 2010, 23:15
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
It seems like WHR is kind of chaotic, in that a small change in initial conditions (the "dummy" bouts?) creates a large change down the linemargaret thatcher wrote: ↑27 Apr 2024, 22:09 joshua #1, anderson #3, fury #11.......................kinda bizarre rankings tbh
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
Hi Martin, why is this upcoming bout between #1 and #3 only rated as 2 stars? Seems weird to me:
https://boxrec.com/en/event/895619/3154916
https://boxrec.com/en/event/895619/3154916
-
computerrank
- Editor

- Posts: 2492
- Joined: 04 Jan 2003, 18:59
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
It wasn't a change in dummy bouts, it was a new damping factor for older bouts. And with the current release update it was a reduced implementation of that factor. And yes, the ratings are very sensible to any parameter changes. But that is due to very insufficient competition in pro boxing compared with other pro sports as soccer, tennis and golf.SportsRatings wrote: ↑06 May 2024, 15:18It seems like WHR is kind of chaotic, in that a small change in initial conditions (the "dummy" bouts?) creates a large change down the linemargaret thatcher wrote: ↑27 Apr 2024, 22:09 joshua #1, anderson #3, fury #11.......................kinda bizarre rankings tbh
-
computerrank
- Editor

- Posts: 2492
- Joined: 04 Jan 2003, 18:59
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
It simply is a bug :-). Should be done with next complete ratings run tomorrow.Grey wrote: ↑06 May 2024, 15:35 Hi Martin, why is this upcoming bout between #1 and #3 only rated as 2 stars? Seems weird to me:
https://boxrec.com/en/event/895619/3154916
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
Make sense
Thanks Martin!
Thanks Martin!
-
computerrank
- Editor

- Posts: 2492
- Joined: 04 Jan 2003, 18:59
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
computerrank wrote: ↑06 May 2024, 18:18It was even simpler, no division was assigned, so heavyweight was assumed. Now I corrected it to super flyweight ...![]()
Ahhh that's good to know! I will doublecheck divisions in the future.
-
computerrank
- Editor

- Posts: 2492
- Joined: 04 Jan 2003, 18:59
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
There is a discussion in the Current Scene forum
viewtopic.php?p=6011994#p6011994
The BoxRec p4p ratings are simply a comprehensive collection of all divisional ratings, where the points are multiplied by a division depending factor.
I can simply reduce that factor and then get those ratings for the top100 p4p boxers:
viewtopic.php?p=6011994#p6011994
The BoxRec p4p ratings are simply a comprehensive collection of all divisional ratings, where the points are multiplied by a division depending factor.
I can simply reduce that factor and then get those ratings for the top100 p4p boxers:
Code: Select all
1 Welterweight 447121 Terence Crawford US 158.6 5.4 1
2 Super Bantamweight 628407 Naoya Inoue JP 155.4 4.5 1
3 Super Middleweight 348759 Saul Alvarez MX 93.09 3.3 1
4 Bantamweight 718508 Junto Nakatani JP 67.39 4.0 1
5 Light Heavyweight 646981 Artur Beterbiev CA 64.05 4.7 1
6 Lightweight 790719 Shakur Stevenson US 57.39 3.1 1
7 Light Heavyweight 703924 Dmitrii Bivol RU 51.06 4.2 1
8 Light Welterweight 749669 Subriel Matias PR 46.77 4.1 1
9 Welterweight 756515 Jaron Ennis US 45.39 3.8 1
10 Super Featherweight 602423 Emanuel Navarrete MX 45.12 2.9 1
11 Super Middleweight 672259 David Benavidez US 44.09 3.7 1
12 Light Flyweight 692967 Kenshiro Teraji JP 41.87 3.1 1
13 Flyweight 791293 Jesse Rodriguez US 40.05 3.3 1
14 Welterweight 765995 Ryan Garcia US 37.88 2.8 1
15 Light Welterweight 741718 Devin Haney US 37.54 2.5 1
16 Featherweight 718399 Brandon Figueroa US 35.96 3.9 1
17 Bantamweight 667667 Takuma Inoue JP 35.82 3.4 1
18 Super Featherweight 626343 O'Shaquie Foster US 35.67 3.1 1
19 Lightweight 744388 William Zepeda Segura MX 35.36 3.9 1
20 Super Flyweight 483786 Kazuto Ioka JP 32.26 4.0 1
21 Super Bantamweight 421916 John Riel Casimero PH 32.10 3.9 1
22 Super Featherweight 806436 Masanori Rikiishi JP 31.49 3.4 1
23 Lightweight 659771 Vasyl Lomachenko UA 31.23 2.9 1
24 Welterweight 629465 Errol Spence Jr US 30.98 4.7 1
25 Featherweight 741197 Luis Alberto Lopez MX 30.97 2.8 1
26 Featherweight 582091 Leigh Wood GB 30.72 3.2 1
27 Middleweight 471634 Jermall Charlo US 30.47 8.2 1
28 Light Middleweight 766727 Vergil Ortiz Jr US 29.64 5.2 1
29 Super Middleweight 659924 Jaime Munguia MX 29.34 3.0 1
30 Light Welterweight 776269 Teofimo Lopez US 29.18 2.8 1
31 Flyweight 685429 Seigo Yuri Akui JP 28.52 3.6 1
32 Super Bantamweight 700183 Stephen Fulton US 28.36 3.7 1
33 Lightweight 775203 Raymond Muratalla US 27.21 3.7 1
34 Middleweight 774417 Zhanibek Alimkhanuly KZ 27.17 3.3 1
35 Light Welterweight 714366 Isaac Cruz MX 26.87 3.1 1
36 Welterweight 612589 Giovani Santillan US 26.38 3.8 1
37 Super Featherweight 746707 Andres Cortes US 26.35 3.8 1
38 Middleweight 588468 Chris Eubank Jr GB 26.21 4.3 1
39 Light Welterweight 632104 Jose Carlos Ramirez US 25.86 4.1 1
40 Heavyweight 659772 Oleksandr Usyk UA 25.34 4.1 1
41 Super Bantamweight 832952 Sam Goodman AU 24.59 3.0 1
42 Super Flyweight 666339 Kosei Tanaka JP 23.89 4.0 1
43 Light Welterweight 469170 Steve Claggett CA 23.78 3.2 1
44 Heavyweight 659461 Anthony Joshua GB 23.41 4.0 1
45 Light Welterweight 787807 Richardson Hitchins US 23.36 3.0 1
46 Super Featherweight 629933 Oscar Valdez MX 23.13 3.1 1
47 Minimumweight 846108 Ginjiro Shigeoka JP 22.93 4.2 1
48 Lightweight 790678 Zaur Abdullaev RU 22.80 3.6 1
49 Welterweight 750377 Conor Benn GB 22.32 4.1 1
50 Super Middleweight 785657 Christian Mbilli FR 22.23 3.7 1
51 Light Welterweight 672119 Andy Hiraoka JP 22.18 5.9 1
52 Light Middleweight 773847 Sebastian Fundora US 22.02 2.8 1
53 Middleweight 457231 Erislandy Lara US 21.77 5.4 1
54 Bantamweight 898844 Ryosuke Nishida JP 21.07 3.1 1
55 Light Welterweight 611370 Regis Prograis US 20.91 2.9 1
56 Light Middleweight 783149 Tim Tszyu AU 20.62 2.7 1
57 Super Bantamweight 611983 Luis Nery MX 20.57 3.8 1
58 Featherweight 668600 Rafael Espinoza MX 20.45 4.1 1
59 Cruiserweight 509666 Gilberto Ramirez MX 20.19 3.6 1
60 Featherweight 801849 Nick Ball GB 20.11 2.7 1
61 Middleweight 778622 Meiirim Nursultanov KZ 19.90 3.4 1
62 Featherweight 850274 Robeisy Ramirez CU 19.87 2.5 1
63 Light Middleweight 851173 Israil Madrimov UZ 19.85 4.0 1
64 Super Bantamweight 482863 Marlon Tapales PH 19.63 4.0 1
65 Featherweight 861531 Raymond Ford US 19.36 3.2 1
66 Bantamweight 990774 Yoshiki Takei JP 19.35 3.0 1
67 Light Flyweight 752510 Masamichi Yabuki JP 19.19 4.9 1
68 Light Welterweight 749212 Liam Paro AU 19.13 4.0 1
69 Light Welterweight 655301 Arnold Barboza Jr US 19.04 3.6 1
70 Middleweight 808683 Hamzah Sheeraz GB 18.84 3.6 1
71 Super Bantamweight 828415 Murodjon Akhmadaliev UZ 18.69 3.2 1
72 Super Featherweight 794105 Joe Cordina GB 18.68 2.9 1
73 Super Bantamweight 793753 Alan Picasso Romero MX 18.61 4.2 1
74 Super Bantamweight 706444 Bryan Mercado Vazquez MX 18.60 3.9 1
75 Super Bantamweight 859643 Liam Davies GB 18.57 3.0 1
76 Light Middleweight 433135 Jermell Charlo US 18.54 5.1 1
77 Minimumweight 919293 Oscar Collazo US 18.15 3.4 1
78 Lightweight 814937 Frank Martin US 17.87 3.0 1
79 Cruiserweight 811275 Chris Billam-Smith GB 17.84 2.9 1
80 Light Welterweight 789597 Gary Antuanne Russell US 17.84 4.3 1
81 Super Flyweight 809729 Fernando Daniel Martinez AR 17.78 3.9 1
82 Light Welterweight 725709 Josh Taylor GB 17.63 3.2 1
83 Featherweight 632458 Angelo Leo US 17.52 3.8 1
84 Lightweight 856316 Albert Batyrgaziev RU 17.46 2.9 1
85 Flyweight 775118 Sunny Edwards GB 16.85 2.7 1
86 Welterweight 665878 Mario Barrios US 16.78 3.3 1
87 Super Bantamweight 580441 Ra'eese Aleem US 16.67 3.4 1
88 Middleweight 466535 Liam Smith GB 16.58 3.1 1
89 Featherweight 768427 Ruben Villa US 16.55 5.0 1
90 Super Featherweight 733152 Eduardo Nunez MX 16.47 4.6 1
91 Super Bantamweight 726502 Ramon Cardenas US 16.41 3.2 1
92 Light Heavyweight 801693 Joshua Buatsi GB 16.38 3.6 1
93 Welterweight 828413 Shakhram Giyasov UZ 16.27 4.2 1
94 Super Featherweight 656951 Albert Bell US 16.01 5.1 1
95 Super Bantamweight 740239 Toshiki Shimomachi JP 15.89 3.4 1
96 Super Middleweight 760625 Edgar Berlanga PR 15.85 3.7 1
97 Light Welterweight 483668 Zhankosh Turarov KZ 15.85 4.6 1
98 Super Middleweight 852450 David Morrell CU 15.79 3.3 1
99 Light Middleweight 788164 Serhii Bohachuk UA 15.69 3.3 1
100 Welterweight 847229 Jin Sasaki JP 15.60 2.6 1Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
Where's the logic in mulitiplying by a division depending factor?computerrank wrote: ↑08 May 2024, 09:57 The BoxRec p4p ratings are simply a comprehensive collection of all divisional ratings, where the points are multiplied by a division depending factor.
-
computerrank
- Editor

- Posts: 2492
- Joined: 04 Jan 2003, 18:59
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
The BoxRec WHR rating of a boxer is equivalent to his absolute fighting strength deducted from bout results. Obviously a heavyweight tends to have has more fighting power than a minimumweight boxer - due to more power (related to weight) and range (related to height). That is reflected by the BoxRec WHR ratings showing higher ratings for higher weight divisions.wouter wrote: ↑08 May 2024, 10:34Where's the logic in multlplying by a division depending factor?computerrank wrote: ↑08 May 2024, 09:57 The BoxRec p4p ratings are simply a comprehensive collection of all divisional ratings, where the points are multiplied by a division depending factor.
p4p ratings try to represent a boxer's rating in relation to the relative fighting power of a division. So this can be accomplished by using a division factor increasing with descending division weight.
By analysing fight results of matched boxers from different weight divisions, I found in the past, that the fighting strength of the boxer is about in proportion to the 3rd or 2nd power of his weight. Currently BoxRec uses the 3rd power of the weight as a conversion factor. But here I used the 2nd power of the weight.
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
You can simply deduct the 'fighting strength' from the results, Of course heavyweights have more power than minimumweights, but not compared to the opponents they have to face. Otherwise, you might as well punish the smaller fighters for only having fought light hitters with short arms.computerrank wrote: ↑08 May 2024, 11:06 The BoxRec WHR rating of a boxer is equivalent to his absolute fighting strength deducted from bout results. Obviously a heavyweight tends to have has more fighting power than a minimumweight boxer - due to more power (related to weight) and range (related to height). That is reflected by the BoxRec WHR ratings showing higher ratings for higher weight divisions.
I think the outcome of the current approach shows that it's not the right formula for P4P rankings.
-
gregregegg
- Lightweight
- Posts: 9142
- Joined: 29 Sep 2017, 04:08
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
The reason the different weights have to be graded a bit different is for when people move through divisions I believe.wouter wrote: ↑08 May 2024, 12:13You can simply deduct the 'fighting strength' from the results, Of course heavyweights have more power than minimumweights, but not compared to the opponents they have to face. Otherwise, you might as well punish the smaller fighters for only having fought light hitters with short arms.computerrank wrote: ↑08 May 2024, 11:06 The BoxRec WHR rating of a boxer is equivalent to his absolute fighting strength deducted from bout results. Obviously a heavyweight tends to have has more fighting power than a minimumweight boxer - due to more power (related to weight) and range (related to height). That is reflected by the BoxRec WHR ratings showing higher ratings for higher weight divisions.
I think the outcome of the current approach shows that it's not the right formula for P4P rankings.
Then you try to undo that to make a p4p list I guess.
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
Heavyweights also face opponents who are more resilient and hit harder. Lighter weights have shorter reaches and less punching power so should there be consideration for that too? I understand the need for a weightclass formula but I think too much emphasis has been put on strength here. Usyk is unanimously top 10, that should be your yardstick when trying to work out the ratio given to each weightclass.
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
Did the algorithm change this boxer's weight class ?
He was at 140 before the update
https://boxrec.com/en/box-pro/757295
He was at 140 before the update
https://boxrec.com/en/box-pro/757295
-
computerrank
- Editor

- Posts: 2492
- Joined: 04 Jan 2003, 18:59
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
The algorithm doesn't change any weight class. That is to the editors.Manrae wrote: ↑09 May 2024, 09:28 Did the algorithm change this boxer's weight class ?
He was at 140 before the update
https://boxrec.com/en/box-pro/757295
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
Hello everyone, I wanted your opinion regarding my rank on boxrec.
I think there is a problem my 3 defeats are against boxers who are currently in the top 300 why am I penalized so much? other boxers with less good records are in front of me I don't understand.
Thank you for your support
https://boxrec.com/en/box-pro/1087014
I think there is a problem my 3 defeats are against boxers who are currently in the top 300 why am I penalized so much? other boxers with less good records are in front of me I don't understand.
Thank you for your support
https://boxrec.com/en/box-pro/1087014
-
computerrank
- Editor

- Posts: 2492
- Joined: 04 Jan 2003, 18:59
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
It was a bug. A new release will show this:Adi67 wrote: ↑09 May 2024, 12:15 Hello everyone, I wanted your opinion regarding my rank on boxrec.
I think there is a problem my 3 defeats are against boxers who are currently in the top 300 why am I penalized so much? other boxers with less good records are in front of me I don't understand.
Thank you for your support
https://boxrec.com/en/box-pro/1087014
-
computerrank
- Editor

- Posts: 2492
- Joined: 04 Jan 2003, 18:59
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
A new release with that will go live on about May 15computerrank wrote: ↑08 May 2024, 09:57 There is a discussion in the Current Scene forum
viewtopic.php?p=6011994#p6011994
The BoxRec p4p ratings are simply a comprehensive collection of all divisional ratings, where the points are multiplied by a division depending factor.
I can simply reduce that factor and then get those ratings for the top100 p4p boxers:
Code: Select all
1 Welterweight 447121 Terence Crawford US 158.6 5.4 1 2 Super Bantamweight 628407 Naoya Inoue JP 155.4 4.5 1 3 Super Middleweight 348759 Saul Alvarez MX 93.09 3.3 1 4 Bantamweight 718508 Junto Nakatani JP 67.39 4.0 1 5 Light Heavyweight 646981 Artur Beterbiev CA 64.05 4.7 1 6 Lightweight 790719 Shakur Stevenson US 57.39 3.1 1 7 Light Heavyweight 703924 Dmitrii Bivol RU 51.06 4.2 1 8 Light Welterweight 749669 Subriel Matias PR 46.77 4.1 1 9 Welterweight 756515 Jaron Ennis US 45.39 3.8 1 10 Super Featherweight 602423 Emanuel Navarrete MX 45.12 2.9 1 11 Super Middleweight 672259 David Benavidez US 44.09 3.7 1 12 Light Flyweight 692967 Kenshiro Teraji JP 41.87 3.1 1 13 Flyweight 791293 Jesse Rodriguez US 40.05 3.3 1 14 Welterweight 765995 Ryan Garcia US 37.88 2.8 1 15 Light Welterweight 741718 Devin Haney US 37.54 2.5 1 16 Featherweight 718399 Brandon Figueroa US 35.96 3.9 1 17 Bantamweight 667667 Takuma Inoue JP 35.82 3.4 1 18 Super Featherweight 626343 O'Shaquie Foster US 35.67 3.1 1 19 Lightweight 744388 William Zepeda Segura MX 35.36 3.9 1 20 Super Flyweight 483786 Kazuto Ioka JP 32.26 4.0 1 21 Super Bantamweight 421916 John Riel Casimero PH 32.10 3.9 1 22 Super Featherweight 806436 Masanori Rikiishi JP 31.49 3.4 1 23 Lightweight 659771 Vasyl Lomachenko UA 31.23 2.9 1 24 Welterweight 629465 Errol Spence Jr US 30.98 4.7 1 25 Featherweight 741197 Luis Alberto Lopez MX 30.97 2.8 1 26 Featherweight 582091 Leigh Wood GB 30.72 3.2 1 27 Middleweight 471634 Jermall Charlo US 30.47 8.2 1 28 Light Middleweight 766727 Vergil Ortiz Jr US 29.64 5.2 1 29 Super Middleweight 659924 Jaime Munguia MX 29.34 3.0 1 30 Light Welterweight 776269 Teofimo Lopez US 29.18 2.8 1 31 Flyweight 685429 Seigo Yuri Akui JP 28.52 3.6 1 32 Super Bantamweight 700183 Stephen Fulton US 28.36 3.7 1 33 Lightweight 775203 Raymond Muratalla US 27.21 3.7 1 34 Middleweight 774417 Zhanibek Alimkhanuly KZ 27.17 3.3 1 35 Light Welterweight 714366 Isaac Cruz MX 26.87 3.1 1 36 Welterweight 612589 Giovani Santillan US 26.38 3.8 1 37 Super Featherweight 746707 Andres Cortes US 26.35 3.8 1 38 Middleweight 588468 Chris Eubank Jr GB 26.21 4.3 1 39 Light Welterweight 632104 Jose Carlos Ramirez US 25.86 4.1 1 40 Heavyweight 659772 Oleksandr Usyk UA 25.34 4.1 1 41 Super Bantamweight 832952 Sam Goodman AU 24.59 3.0 1 42 Super Flyweight 666339 Kosei Tanaka JP 23.89 4.0 1 43 Light Welterweight 469170 Steve Claggett CA 23.78 3.2 1 44 Heavyweight 659461 Anthony Joshua GB 23.41 4.0 1 45 Light Welterweight 787807 Richardson Hitchins US 23.36 3.0 1 46 Super Featherweight 629933 Oscar Valdez MX 23.13 3.1 1 47 Minimumweight 846108 Ginjiro Shigeoka JP 22.93 4.2 1 48 Lightweight 790678 Zaur Abdullaev RU 22.80 3.6 1 49 Welterweight 750377 Conor Benn GB 22.32 4.1 1 50 Super Middleweight 785657 Christian Mbilli FR 22.23 3.7 1 51 Light Welterweight 672119 Andy Hiraoka JP 22.18 5.9 1 52 Light Middleweight 773847 Sebastian Fundora US 22.02 2.8 1 53 Middleweight 457231 Erislandy Lara US 21.77 5.4 1 54 Bantamweight 898844 Ryosuke Nishida JP 21.07 3.1 1 55 Light Welterweight 611370 Regis Prograis US 20.91 2.9 1 56 Light Middleweight 783149 Tim Tszyu AU 20.62 2.7 1 57 Super Bantamweight 611983 Luis Nery MX 20.57 3.8 1 58 Featherweight 668600 Rafael Espinoza MX 20.45 4.1 1 59 Cruiserweight 509666 Gilberto Ramirez MX 20.19 3.6 1 60 Featherweight 801849 Nick Ball GB 20.11 2.7 1 61 Middleweight 778622 Meiirim Nursultanov KZ 19.90 3.4 1 62 Featherweight 850274 Robeisy Ramirez CU 19.87 2.5 1 63 Light Middleweight 851173 Israil Madrimov UZ 19.85 4.0 1 64 Super Bantamweight 482863 Marlon Tapales PH 19.63 4.0 1 65 Featherweight 861531 Raymond Ford US 19.36 3.2 1 66 Bantamweight 990774 Yoshiki Takei JP 19.35 3.0 1 67 Light Flyweight 752510 Masamichi Yabuki JP 19.19 4.9 1 68 Light Welterweight 749212 Liam Paro AU 19.13 4.0 1 69 Light Welterweight 655301 Arnold Barboza Jr US 19.04 3.6 1 70 Middleweight 808683 Hamzah Sheeraz GB 18.84 3.6 1 71 Super Bantamweight 828415 Murodjon Akhmadaliev UZ 18.69 3.2 1 72 Super Featherweight 794105 Joe Cordina GB 18.68 2.9 1 73 Super Bantamweight 793753 Alan Picasso Romero MX 18.61 4.2 1 74 Super Bantamweight 706444 Bryan Mercado Vazquez MX 18.60 3.9 1 75 Super Bantamweight 859643 Liam Davies GB 18.57 3.0 1 76 Light Middleweight 433135 Jermell Charlo US 18.54 5.1 1 77 Minimumweight 919293 Oscar Collazo US 18.15 3.4 1 78 Lightweight 814937 Frank Martin US 17.87 3.0 1 79 Cruiserweight 811275 Chris Billam-Smith GB 17.84 2.9 1 80 Light Welterweight 789597 Gary Antuanne Russell US 17.84 4.3 1 81 Super Flyweight 809729 Fernando Daniel Martinez AR 17.78 3.9 1 82 Light Welterweight 725709 Josh Taylor GB 17.63 3.2 1 83 Featherweight 632458 Angelo Leo US 17.52 3.8 1 84 Lightweight 856316 Albert Batyrgaziev RU 17.46 2.9 1 85 Flyweight 775118 Sunny Edwards GB 16.85 2.7 1 86 Welterweight 665878 Mario Barrios US 16.78 3.3 1 87 Super Bantamweight 580441 Ra'eese Aleem US 16.67 3.4 1 88 Middleweight 466535 Liam Smith GB 16.58 3.1 1 89 Featherweight 768427 Ruben Villa US 16.55 5.0 1 90 Super Featherweight 733152 Eduardo Nunez MX 16.47 4.6 1 91 Super Bantamweight 726502 Ramon Cardenas US 16.41 3.2 1 92 Light Heavyweight 801693 Joshua Buatsi GB 16.38 3.6 1 93 Welterweight 828413 Shakhram Giyasov UZ 16.27 4.2 1 94 Super Featherweight 656951 Albert Bell US 16.01 5.1 1 95 Super Bantamweight 740239 Toshiki Shimomachi JP 15.89 3.4 1 96 Super Middleweight 760625 Edgar Berlanga PR 15.85 3.7 1 97 Light Welterweight 483668 Zhankosh Turarov KZ 15.85 4.6 1 98 Super Middleweight 852450 David Morrell CU 15.79 3.3 1 99 Light Middleweight 788164 Serhii Bohachuk UA 15.69 3.3 1 100 Welterweight 847229 Jin Sasaki JP 15.60 2.6 1
-
computerrank
- Editor

- Posts: 2492
- Joined: 04 Jan 2003, 18:59
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
computerrank wrote: ↑10 May 2024, 07:21It was a bug. A new release will show this:Adi67 wrote: ↑09 May 2024, 12:15 Hello everyone, I wanted your opinion regarding my rank on boxrec.
I think there is a problem my 3 defeats are against boxers who are currently in the top 300 why am I penalized so much? other boxers with less good records are in front of me I don't understand.
Thank you for your support
https://boxrec.com/en/box-pro/1087014
Ok thank you so much