Page 4 of 5
Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov
Posted: 29 Sep 2012, 17:35
by Wales
Datsue wrote:When they showed Povetkin's missus, did anyone else think immediately of that old Simpsons riff, where Homer invents the make-up gun, but sets it to "Whore"?
I instantly thought blow job
Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov
Posted: 29 Sep 2012, 17:36
by milpool
Jeez, Rahman was awful.
Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov
Posted: 29 Sep 2012, 17:37
by mcato
Rubbish show
Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov
Posted: 29 Sep 2012, 17:38
by Wales
mcato wrote:Rubbish show
Pulev boxed well... Errrm...
Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov
Posted: 29 Sep 2012, 17:39
by crusader
I missed that. Did Rahman injure his leg or were his legs turned to jelly by a punch?
Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov
Posted: 29 Sep 2012, 17:40
by Old bones Ian
crusader wrote:I missed that. Did Rahman injury his leg or were they turned to jelly by a punch?
He was just overwhelmed by punches, not a good thing to watch. An out of shape old heavyweight, get bounced off the ropes
Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov
Posted: 29 Sep 2012, 17:42
by Bronxbull666
What a contrast of stoppages tonight? Jesus, was that ref trying to kill Rahman?
On the flip side, when the ref was raising the winner's hand, Povetkin looked real tired.
Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov
Posted: 29 Sep 2012, 17:43
by Datsue
Bronxbull666 wrote:What a contrast of stoppages tonight? Jesus, was that ref trying to kill Rahman?
On the flip side, when the ref was raising the winner's hand, Povetkin looked real tired.
They wanted a highlight reel knockdown. Unfortunately for them, Rahman was fighting Povetkin...
Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov
Posted: 29 Sep 2012, 17:43
by Wales
Bronxbull666 wrote:What a contrast of stoppages tonight? Jesus, was that ref trying to kill Rahman?
On the flip side, when the ref was raising the winner's hand, Povetkin looked real tired.
Exactly, difference between rahman stoppage and thompsons
Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov
Posted: 29 Sep 2012, 17:44
by Datsue
crusader wrote:I missed that. Did Rahman injure his leg or were his legs turned to jelly by a punch?
His legs were wobbling coming down the stairs for the ring-walk.
Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov
Posted: 29 Sep 2012, 17:44
by Final round
Maybe Rahman should get a few free blows at that cunting refs head.
Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov
Posted: 29 Sep 2012, 17:49
by loaded_gloves
Rahman looked brain damaged. His body was awful, and he could barely walk or move - before the fight even began! An absolutely shameful contest, literally one of the worst heavyweight title fights ever.
Povetkin and the WBA are an embarrassment. Povetkin needs to be KOd by Pulev or a Klit and go away. The WBA need to be lined up against a wall and shot.
Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov
Posted: 29 Sep 2012, 17:50
by iamasadlittleboy
loaded_gloves wrote:Rahman looked brain damaged. His body was awful, and he could barely walk or move - before the fight even began! An absolutely shameful contest, literally one of the worst heavyweight title fights ever.
Povetkin and the WBA are an embarrassment. Povetkin needs to be KOd by Pulev or a Klit and go away. The WBA need to be lined up against a wall and shot.
Further proves the WBA heavyweight title is a joke, it's been one since Lennox gave it up.
Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov
Posted: 29 Sep 2012, 17:52
by loaded_gloves
Agreed. The WBA allowed John Ruiz to hide out as a second class heavyweight champion for 10 years. They gave us Nikolay Valuev, Haye/Harrison and now Alex Povetkin. They made unification impossible with the super belts in order to line their pockets.
These WBA bandits should be in prison.
Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov
Posted: 29 Sep 2012, 17:54
by Old bones Ian
One good thing to come of tonight is how good Julius Francis is on TV, knowledgeable and up to date with his boxing.
Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov
Posted: 29 Sep 2012, 18:00
by crusader
Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov
Posted: 29 Sep 2012, 18:02
by crusader
keithmoonhangover wrote:Povetkin looked really sharp, unlike the ref.
It would be difficult not to look sharp against that version of Rahman.
Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov
Posted: 30 Sep 2012, 00:27
by Kilburn
Glad to see Bermane Stiverne and Chris Arreola have been matched for November / December. Could be an interesting one.
Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov
Posted: 30 Sep 2012, 03:54
by reggaereggae
iamasadlittleboy wrote:It's Ronald Mcintosh not McDonald! Even Rawling made that faux pas
Yeah I know I was doing it facetiously.
But yeah I noticed Rawling saying that - I thought maybe I had misheard him; how embarassing!!!!
Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov
Posted: 30 Sep 2012, 04:58
by loaded_gloves
The Dark Destroyer wrote:loaded_gloves wrote:Agreed. The WBA allowed John Ruiz to hide out as a second class heavyweight champion for 10 years. They gave us Nikolay Valuev, Haye/Harrison and now Alex Povetkin. They made unification impossible with the super belts in order to line their pockets.
These WBA bandits should be in prison.
The WBA is unified. Wlad has it, it becomes the WBA super when you unify the regular WBA with another title. This thing Povetkin has is the bogus title.
I know what you mean though but it's not though really, is it? Wlad has the WBA world title and yet this and all Povetkin's fights are sold as 'WBA world title fights'. The super belt invention is an absolute stinker.
Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov
Posted: 30 Sep 2012, 05:09
by loaded_gloves
Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov
Posted: 30 Sep 2012, 06:17
by stujones
Like Danny Williams on Friday, I just felt sorry for Rahman - a good heavyweight on his day. He didn't quit just his punch resistance and legs have gone.
Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov
Posted: 30 Sep 2012, 08:10
by MightyWarrior
Reminded me of Bowe/Dokes, a real low point for all concerned - allegedly included, who tried to bring this "fight" to the UK, god help us.
And how the German dandy promoters could celebrate in the ring like that after, like their man had just done something fantastic, was shameful.
And the ref should retire immeditately, as he clearly has no idea when to stop a fight.
Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov
Posted: 30 Sep 2012, 08:20
by reggaereggae
I though this was both amusing and disturbing of Rahman to be so deluded....
Then Rahman, who needs to retire immediately before he gets hurt (and also so he no longer subjects the boxing public to these kinds of preposterous mismatches) said something so over the top it was laughable.
"The fight would have been different if it was in America," he said.
No it wouldn't.
It would have been exactly the same mandated WBA madness, only with a shorter plane ride needed for Rahman and his promoter, Greg Cohen, to get home to cash the paycheck -- minus the sanctioning fees, of course -- that they came for but did not deserve.
Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov
Posted: 30 Sep 2012, 11:40
by loaded_gloves
Rahman has always been delusional. He bitched and moaned his way through both Maskaev fights, and the Corrie Sanders, John Ruiz, Evander Holyfield and second Lennox Lewis and James Toney fights. He gets knocked down and claims he didn't. You hit him in the head and he calls it a low blow. If he got knocked clean out he'd deny it. He's an on top fighter. God only knows how bad he must have looked in sparring, hope all his hangers on got a nice payday.