Thats a bit like saying anyone who subscribes to the adult channel is a sexual deviant, first and foremost.bengulnaci1 wrote: His channel really only appeals to fans of the sport. So I naturally assume (possibly incorrectly) that those who subscribe are Boxing fans, first and foremost.
The Demise of Warren - whose fault?
-
Khaosai-Galaxy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2739
- Joined: 29 Apr 2007, 12:15
Re: The Demise of Warren - whose fault?
Re: The Demise of Warren - whose fault?
No, not really. However we are digressing.Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:Thats a bit like saying anyone who subscribes to the adult channel is a sexual deviant, first and foremost.bengulnaci1 wrote: His channel really only appeals to fans of the sport. So I naturally assume (possibly incorrectly) that those who subscribe are Boxing fans, first and foremost.
-
Khaosai-Galaxy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2739
- Joined: 29 Apr 2007, 12:15
Re: The Demise of Warren - whose fault?
no shitbengulnaci1 wrote:No, not really. However we are digressing.Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:Thats a bit like saying anyone who subscribes to the adult channel is a sexual deviant, first and foremost.bengulnaci1 wrote: His channel really only appeals to fans of the sport. So I naturally assume (possibly incorrectly) that those who subscribe are Boxing fans, first and foremost.
Re: The Demise of Warren - whose fault?
Finn wrote:Tongue in cheek? i was being serious about your dad. Keyboard warriorDeserter wrote: I'm more than satisfied with that response as I think it says it all for everyone to see in terms of your stance.
PS. The father reference was clearly a tongue-in-cheek one continuing the 'father' theme you first introduced, but that clearly went over your head, hence your somewhat bizarre need to assert his business credentialsMy stance is unless its got too much to do with boxing i discuss it on the off topic board at my choosing, if i wanted to discuss business in depth i'd go on a business forum and speak to people who actually have more than an inflated self notion of their knowledge. I was giving a glancing statement before you started having a geekgasm.
-
Jeff Thomas
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3016
- Joined: 30 Apr 2009, 06:32
Re: The Demise of Warren - whose fault?
He's irrelevant these days really. If he said right now I'm never promoting another show or fight it would make no difference to me whatsoever.Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:Without bothering to go and look this up, i always thought that over the last 25 years or so, when Mr Warren was the dominant force in British boxing, general interest was at its highest. When he had a bad patch, British boxing tended to fade into the background.iamasadlittleboy wrote:I think Allegedly channel could become better as a result of Warren's downfall. Boxing in general won't really improve or decline with him failing though IMO.Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:So do some of you people think boxing is going to be "better" now that Mr Warren is having a rough period?
I don't subscribe to allegedly. If I really want to watch something on it I have the means and he rarely if ever puts on fights that I'd go to the trouble of taking time outgo watch.
Matchrooms show last night was pretty poor- but miles better then what were used to from anyone else.
Re: The Demise of Warren - whose fault?
Deserter wrote:Finn wrote:Tongue in cheek? i was being serious about your dad. Keyboard warriorDeserter wrote: I'm more than satisfied with that response as I think it says it all for everyone to see in terms of your stance.
PS. The father reference was clearly a tongue-in-cheek one continuing the 'father' theme you first introduced, but that clearly went over your head, hence your somewhat bizarre need to assert his business credentialsMy stance is unless its got too much to do with boxing i discuss it on the off topic board at my choosing, if i wanted to discuss business in depth i'd go on a business forum and speak to people who actually have more than an inflated self notion of their knowledge. I was giving a glancing statement before you started having a geekgasm.
Calm down fella. Clearly I apologise for asking questions about the viability of Britain's only dedicated boxing subscription channel on a British boxing forum, it's clearly inappropriate. Feel free to continue ducking my perfectly legitimate questions and carry on as you are
Im not ducking your questions i just didnt read them, i did tell you that, your post was already too anal and boring 1 sentence in
Re: The Demise of Warren - whose fault?
Give it a fuckin rest