Page 4 of 5

Re: Froch please shut up your making a mug of yourself.

Posted: 28 Dec 2013, 09:09
by hurlock
Aden wrote:
Spud wrote::lol: :lol: :lol:

I am on the train at the moment ... I am holding a couple of cards in my hand and for a change I am going to deal them at the right time.
You're not sitting with Kenny Rogers are you, mate?
I think it's the first time ain't bunked the train & hid in the carzies :DD when the ticket collector comes spud will abuse him before showing him his hand?

Re: Froch please shut up your making a mug of yourself.

Posted: 28 Dec 2013, 09:11
by mickey1975
Spud wrote::lol: :lol: :lol:

I am on the train at the moment ... I will respond to you tossers asap ... With regards to being in the minority never will have a problem there.

I remember years ago I stated Carl Froch would be a multiple world champion, i got ridiculed etc etc, now i am saying George Groves will be exposed for the **** I think he is - I am holding a couple of cards in my hand and for a change I am going to deal them at the right time.
He's only a multiple champion because he has lost it twice. He has never, ever been number one in his division.

Re: Froch please shut up your making a mug of yourself.

Posted: 28 Dec 2013, 09:50
by Spud
SNG wrote:
Spud wrote: By consistently taking on the very best the Super Middleweight division has to offer ...
...and Yusef Mack.

Look, Froch bleated on about Kessler 2 being the rematch the fans wanted to see, now the fans are actually telling him what they want to see, a fight that would be the biggest out there for him and he's talking about not doing it. We all know why, you do too.
Now please young man, many people have tried in the past, do not tell me what I am thinking or know ... yet again you use the word "we" ... can you not write posts and stand up for yourself ... you are yet another spineless p*ick who is desperate to court favour with the forum ... write for yourself!!

Re: Froch please shut up your making a mug of yourself.

Posted: 28 Dec 2013, 10:02
by hurlock
mickey1975 wrote:
Spud wrote::lol: :lol: :lol:

I am on the train at the moment ... I will respond to you tossers asap ... With regards to being in the minority never will have a problem there.

I remember years ago I stated Carl Froch would be a multiple world champion, i got ridiculed etc etc, now i am saying George Groves will be exposed for the **** I think he is - I am holding a couple of cards in my hand and for a change I am going to deal them at the right time.
He's only a multiple champion because he has lost it twice. He has never, ever been number one in his division.
Bit harsh that he's only been second to ward who's creme de la creme. When he beat pascal then Taylor I think that proved he was more then a legitimate champion

Re: Froch please shut up your making a mug of yourself.

Posted: 28 Dec 2013, 10:05
by Spud
Power777 wrote:
hurlock wrote:Does spud think the same way of Hayes treatment to wladimir?
Atleast groves backed it up.
GOOD QUESTION!
But we all know SPUD is not consistent.
To the contrary young man - I think its hilarious many of you on this forum try lump the fickle/consistency problem on me ...

Time and time again I have to answer this ... I do not hide other than when slagging Curtis Sh*thouse :lol: everyone in boxing knows me as Spud .. and through my opinions on here and elsewhere plus sheer hard graft throughout the years I accomplished my dreams in that I have worked in boxing and got up to things in the sport that most of you lot can only wank about whilst reading your Boxing News!! ;;-)

With regards David & Wladimir - nope David did not produce the goods that he said he would, but most of you miss the opportunity to congratulate Wladimir for executing a fantastic fight plan designed by the great Manny Steward. I think David will be distraught and deeply upset as he is wading through the multi millions he has in his bank account.

There was a clear stratedgy to get Wladimir in the ring and K2 to agree a 50/50 deal ... it worked ... but you are correct the fight plan didnt.

Re: Froch please shut up your making a mug of yourself.

Posted: 28 Dec 2013, 10:11
by Spud
Power777 wrote:GROVES VS WARD in the UK would show Carl Cock.
If you think that fight is as big as Froch v Ward 2 you are kidding yourself.

Ok lets get real here with regards what Carl Froch should do next ... go to the most lucrative deal he would be f*cking mad to do otherwise and if that means meeting and beating George Groves AGAIN then so be it.

Re: Froch please shut up your making a mug of yourself.

Posted: 28 Dec 2013, 10:13
by hurlock
Lmao!!! :lol: :lol: see what happens when people work with the dark lord!! The smugness of this post!!

Oh spudley!!! You are living the dream!! :bow: :DDD

Re: Froch please shut up your making a mug of yourself.

Posted: 28 Dec 2013, 10:13
by Spud
mickey1975 wrote:He's only a multiple champion because he has lost it twice. He has never, ever been number one in his division.
Lets get serious here ... do you think your post is a bit harsh??

Re: Froch please shut up your making a mug of yourself.

Posted: 28 Dec 2013, 10:27
by JimStone
Carl is a British great but I think it's fair to say that he's never been the best in the division globally. Which Brits have been in the past thirty years or so? Haye at cruiserweight, Joe at super-middleweight, and Lennox at heavyweight, beyond that..?

Re: Froch please shut up your making a mug of yourself.

Posted: 28 Dec 2013, 10:32
by Horse
Aden wrote:Carl is a British great but I think it's fair to say that he's never been the best in the division globally. Which Brits have been in the past thirty years or so? Haye at cruiserweight, Joe at super-middleweight, and Lennox at heavyweight, beyond that..?
Ricky Hatton at light welterweight.

Re: Froch please shut up your making a mug of yourself.

Posted: 28 Dec 2013, 10:32
by hurlock
Aden wrote:Carl is a British great but I think it's fair to say that he's never been the best in the division globally. Which Brits have been in the past thirty years or so? Haye at cruiserweight, Joe at super-middleweight, and Lennox at heavyweight, beyond that..?
Joe had to wait!

Naseem was the man at feather until Barrera moved up.
Hatton was the best l.welter in the world.
Bit harsh on benn he managed to pull it off in America & then got thrown to the lions against McClellan & came out on top.

Re: Froch please shut up your making a mug of yourself.

Posted: 28 Dec 2013, 10:36
by palooka
Aden wrote:Carl is a British great but I think it's fair to say that he's never been the best in the division globally. Which Brits have been in the past thirty years or so? Haye at cruiserweight, Joe at super-middleweight, and Lennox at heavyweight, beyond that..?
You're going to have Silly Nelson on here within 5 minutes

Re: Froch please shut up your making a mug of yourself.

Posted: 28 Dec 2013, 10:38
by JimStone
Horse wrote:
Aden wrote:Carl is a British great but I think it's fair to say that he's never been the best in the division globally. Which Brits have been in the past thirty years or so? Haye at cruiserweight, Joe at super-middleweight, and Lennox at heavyweight, beyond that..?
Ricky Hatton at light welterweight.
I think Ricky would've been beaten by more than one other active pro who could've done 140lb at the time. Before people start, I admit I've got a odd way of looking at things.

Re: Froch please shut up your making a mug of yourself.

Posted: 28 Dec 2013, 10:40
by palooka
Aden wrote:
Horse wrote:
Aden wrote:Carl is a British great but I think it's fair to say that he's never been the best in the division globally. Which Brits have been in the past thirty years or so? Haye at cruiserweight, Joe at super-middleweight, and Lennox at heavyweight, beyond that..?
Ricky Hatton at light welterweight.
I think Ricky would've been beaten by more than one other active pro who could've done 140lb at the time. Before people start, I admit I've got a odd way of looking at things.
It was noticed a long time ago

Re: Froch please shut up your making a mug of yourself.

Posted: 28 Dec 2013, 10:41
by JimStone
palooka wrote:It was noticed a long time ago
Who asked you, chubby legs?

Re: Froch please shut up your making a mug of yourself.

Posted: 28 Dec 2013, 10:43
by palooka
Aden wrote:
palooka wrote:It was noticed a long time ago
Who asked you, chubby legs?
:OhYes: I've been here watching all along

(and that was very funny :TU: )

Re: Froch please shut up your making a mug of yourself.

Posted: 28 Dec 2013, 10:49
by mickey1975
Spud wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:He's only a multiple champion because he has lost it twice. He has never, ever been number one in his division.
Lets get serious here ... do you think your post is a bit harsh??
Yes. But it's true. I'm just twisting things to suit my agenda like everyone else does on here.

Re: Froch please shut up your making a mug of yourself.

Posted: 28 Dec 2013, 10:53
by Tomasino
mickey1975 wrote:
Spud wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:He's only a multiple champion because he has lost it twice. He has never, ever been number one in his division.
Lets get serious here ... do you think your post is a bit harsh??
Yes. But it's true. I'm just twisting things to suit my agenda like everyone else does on here.

:lol:

Re: Froch please shut up your making a mug of yourself.

Posted: 28 Dec 2013, 10:56
by Spud
mickey1975 wrote:
Spud wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:He's only a multiple champion because he has lost it twice. He has never, ever been number one in his division.
Lets get serious here ... do you think your post is a bit harsh??
Yes. But it's true. I'm just twisting things to suit my agenda like everyone else does on here.
:lol: :lol: :lol:

Good on ya fella!!!

Re: Froch please shut up your making a mug of yourself.

Posted: 28 Dec 2013, 11:00
by palooka
mickey1975 wrote:
Spud wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:He's only a multiple champion because he has lost it twice. He has never, ever been number one in his division.
Lets get serious here ... do you think your post is a bit harsh??
Yes. But it's true. I'm just twisting things to suit my agenda like everyone else does on here.
Froch can box who he likes but I'll not pay to see him v Chavez Jnr or Ward 2, I'll shell out for Groves 2. Froch has faced very good fighters and has my respect as a boxer and a champion; he has let himself down or shown his true character with the Groves thing, he has been very dismissive and really believes that something happened other than actually happened. He thought he was a full league above Groves and that Groves was chinny. I don't think that Froch is afraid of Groves but I do think that George shocked him a hell of a lot and it was a very fortunate stoppage (for Froch). It was Froch that took a beating and he is far older with far more miles on the clock; Groves can improve and do better, I don't think Froch can, I think he's on the slide.

Re: Froch please shut up your making a mug of yourself.

Posted: 28 Dec 2013, 11:35
by SNG
Spud wrote:
SNG wrote:
Spud wrote: By consistently taking on the very best the Super Middleweight division has to offer ...
...and Yusef Mack.

Look, Froch bleated on about Kessler 2 being the rematch the fans wanted to see, now the fans are actually telling him what they want to see, a fight that would be the biggest out there for him and he's talking about not doing it. We all know why, you do too.
Now please young man, many people have tried in the past, do not tell me what I am thinking or know ... yet again you use the word "we" ... can you not write posts and stand up for yourself ... you are yet another spineless p*ick who is desperate to court favour with the forum ... write for yourself!!
What kind of fuckin response is that? Court favour with the forum? You need to grow the fornicate up. I have literally no idea why you've chosen to attack me instead of my point, I can only guess you have no argument.

Yet again I used 'we', when did I use it before?

Re: Froch please shut up your making a mug of yourself.

Posted: 28 Dec 2013, 12:48
by TheGman
If froch doesnt give groves a rematch and keeps goin on about how he beat him then why would ward give him a rematch when froch lost every round regardless of what the score cards read he got schooled. So he shouldnt keep harpin on about ward if he wont entertain groves.

Re: Froch please shut up your making a mug of yourself.

Posted: 28 Dec 2013, 12:53
by TheGman
But saying that i wouldnt want to give groves a rematch if i was froch either,he got a 7 round beating and if groves was abit more clinical he could of knocked froch out in the first 3 rounds.

Re: Froch please shut up your making a mug of yourself.

Posted: 28 Dec 2013, 14:00
by whiskey
This topic is like Kony 2012

Re: Froch please shut up your making a mug of yourself.

Posted: 28 Dec 2013, 14:05
by SNG
G0mez wrote:This topic is like Kony 2012
Are you suggesting TJ77 is going to be found naked in the street interfering with himself?