Golovkin undercard
Re: Golovkin undercard
Murray and Macklin seem to be on the same level to me. I'd put Stevens a bit below, but I think he's a better fighter now than he was at 168.
Last edited by crusader on 01 Feb 2014, 16:55, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Golovkin undercard
I don't know. I think Stevens could knock Macklin out.crusader wrote:Murray and Macklin seem to be on the same level to me. I'd put Stevens below, but I think he's a better fighter now than he was at 168.
Re: Golovkin undercard
I wouldn't be shocked if he beat them, but I'd have him the underdog.columbo wrote:I don't know. I think Stevens could knock Macklin out.crusader wrote:Murray and Macklin seem to be on the same level to me. I'd put Stevens below, but I think he's a better fighter now than he was at 168.
Re: Golovkin undercard
That's a fight that HBO should make actually.crusader wrote:I wouldn't be shocked if he beat them, but I'd have him the underdog.columbo wrote:I don't know. I think Stevens could knock Macklin out.crusader wrote:Murray and Macklin seem to be on the same level to me. I'd put Stevens below, but I think he's a better fighter now than he was at 168.
Re: Golovkin undercard
Ya, I agree.
-
ttornado
- Heavyweight

Re: Golovkin undercard
I'd put Lee in with the Macklin level, and his boxing skills are a bit superior to anyone you mentioned.crusader wrote:Murray and Macklin seem to be on the same level to me. I'd put Stevens a bit below, but I think he's a better fighter now than he was at 168.