BoxRec

stevieb_8006 wrote:

Anzi wrote:

MightyWarrior wrote:Though to be fair, I think all the really top fighters have that level of ruthless spite about them, just some hide it more than others. Joe had it as well.

"Though to be fair" sounds like a Froch quote lol, Froch kept telling Groves something about moving on and not harping on about the past i.e the controversial stoppage in the first fight, maybe Froch should move on now and forget Groves or maybe he just can't ? longer terms sports psychology ?

Jesus, it's been four days. And it's an article for boxing news ffs

Tomasino wrote:

danconnollyeire wrote:George should bitterly regret leaving Booth. He could've (IMO would've) been world champion beating one of the P4P best by now. Fair play to Froch, made him look like he ran out of ideas due to not being able to get under his skin. If Booth was devising the plan, he maybe wouldn't need to have been so petty at times. He wasn't such a dick vs Degail, Booth would've advised him what to say, how to get fans on you side and how to avoid getting KOd on his way to a points win

He lost twice to the better man. Booth can't change that fact.

Ian1973 wrote:
I do think Booth was very important for Groves. At the top level of any sport it's often small margins and minor details that can make a difference. Booth is very, very good at what he does and i can't help thinking Groves is a lesser fighter without booth's influence.

Whether or not booth being around Groves would've changed either fight is pure conjecture no-one can know for certain no more than anyone can say for certain that Marciano would've beaten Ali or Ali would've beaten Tyson or Tyson would've beaten Joe Louis. Yes, we can all have opinions but without evidence they're not really worth much.

Anzi wrote:

columbo wrote:Plural motherfucker, plural!

Yawn , Woman, motherfucker !

danconnollyeire wrote:

Anzi wrote:

columbo wrote:Plural motherfucker, plural!

Yawn , Woman, motherfucker !

Anzi, when you said you coach, who exactly do you coach?

Anzi wrote:Is this a women ? The sort of reaction a women would come out with.

stevieb_8006 wrote:

Anzi wrote:Is this a women ? The sort of reaction a women would come out with.

I was gona answer this but it seems the 'rec regulars have already dealt with it. I'm a "women" for pointing out carl was merely answering an interview question 4 days after a fight. But anzi's oh so masculine getting up in arms like a frustrated housewife in case poor groves is upset by the mean comments.

Anzi wrote: Your mother

Anzi wrote:

stevieb_8006 wrote:

Anzi wrote:Is this a women ? The sort of reaction a women would come out with.

I was gona answer this but it seems the 'rec regulars have already dealt with it. I'm a "women" for pointing out carl was merely answering an interview question 4 days after a fight. But anzi's oh so masculine getting up in arms like a frustrated housewife in case poor groves is upset by the mean comments.

Ha Ha, it was tongue in cheek, not meant as an insult, it was just your bull in a china shop response, that reminded me of someone, that's all, it does not matter if it was 4 days after a fight or 1 day, fighters who have grudges usually squash them after a fight, the respect is there for the opponents, because fighters know what the other has gone through, Groves is to blame as well, both should know better, but I was commenting on his interview, anyone with intelligence can see that Froch is scarred mentally from the experience. Peace.

danconnollyeire wrote:

Anzi wrote: Your mother

Well that's just pathetic trolling, I was genuinely interested. Your a clown

Anzi wrote:

danconnollyeire wrote:

Anzi wrote: Your mother

Well that's just pathetic trolling, I was genuinely interested. Your a clown

I am trolling ? Different subject, another post, another day, yeh, right ! We all know where it was leading, don't we ? Sorry I upset one of your internet mates, was not meant that way or you, just as I said, tongue in cheek, Humour, I guess you have to be part of the Click to do that.

Anzi wrote:

danconnollyeire wrote:

Anzi wrote: Your mother

Well that's just pathetic trolling, I was genuinely interested. Your a clown

I am trolling ? Different subject, another post, another day, yeh, right ! We all know where it was leading, don't we ? Sorry I upset one of your internet mates, was not meant that way or you, just as I said, tongue in cheek, Humour, I guess you have to be part of the Click to do that.

Anzi wrote:It was funny to me, as you are, did you mention Infants lol, if you don't like my jokes, then don't respond to them, trust me, you are no loss to me.

Viktor Vaughn wrote:And people say that witty repartee is a thing of the past.

Anzi wrote:It is quite clear who is the child here, now go away and play with your little friends, YAWN.

Viktor Vaughn wrote:

Anzi wrote:

Viktor Vaughn wrote:And people say that witty repartee is a thing of the past.

NO DOUBT

They split up years ago, they're definitely a thing of the past.

Viktor Vaughn wrote:

Anzi wrote:

Viktor Vaughn wrote:And people say that witty repartee is a thing of the past.

NO DOUBT

They split up years ago, they're definitely a thing of the past.

Anzi wrote:Some guys on here like to massage each others dicks, that's for sure, I think I will leave this party, not for me, some need employment, too much time on their hands to search the internet for props and phrases.

Anzi wrote:Some guys on here like to massage each others dicks, that's for sure, I think I will leave this party, not for me, some need employment, too much time on their hands to search the internet for props and phrases.

danconnollyeire wrote:

Anzi wrote:Some guys on here like to massage each others dicks, that's for sure, I think I will leave this party, not for me, some need employment, too much time on their hands to search the internet for props and phrases.

Buy Sareefah or whatever you used to be called on here before