The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread
Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread
57-57. But McDonnell is just too big. It shows an importance of weight management in the modern boxing.
Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread
67-66 McDonnell
-
MightyWarrior
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13359
- Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01
Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread
nick Halling is a major league dork
Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread
77-75 McDonnell
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13497
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread
Yeah but in a post fight interview they asked Morales what he thought of Barry McGuigan and he said 'who?'brilo33 wrote: tell me when you see morales v pacquiao you diddnt think what pride these men have
I chucked my sofa out the window and left.
Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread
I've not been keeping score because I keep expecting McDonnell to completely take over. He has all the tools to dismantle this guy but he's not managing to do it.
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread
Brilo- when McDonnell dug in and took the last 2.rounds against Ceja, did you really not see pride in that? Do you think Manny pacquiao or Morales for that matter knows who, say, emile Griffith was? Or bob foster?
the blokes getting punched in the face for your entertainment isn't that enough for you?
as for fighting for his country? You really think in the corner round 12 to come at the end.of a torrid battle some geezers thinking 'i'm tired here but eh, queen and country, cant let the.memory of Winston Churchill down'? If you feel they are fighting for, what did you say, something about blood and country? I strongly suspect.that is a.delusion of your own choosing and that fighters fight for themselves and their family etc and that the idea.of fighting for 60 million strangers is utter bollocks, but to each their own i guess
the blokes getting punched in the face for your entertainment isn't that enough for you?
as for fighting for his country? You really think in the corner round 12 to come at the end.of a torrid battle some geezers thinking 'i'm tired here but eh, queen and country, cant let the.memory of Winston Churchill down'? If you feel they are fighting for, what did you say, something about blood and country? I strongly suspect.that is a.delusion of your own choosing and that fighters fight for themselves and their family etc and that the idea.of fighting for 60 million strangers is utter bollocks, but to each their own i guess
Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread
86-85 McDonnell
Last edited by Horse on 28 Mar 2015, 17:18, edited 2 times in total.
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread
jameswilson wrote:Yeah but in a post fight interview they asked Morales what he thought of Barry McGuigan and he said 'who?'brilo33 wrote: tell me when you see morales v pacquiao you diddnt think what pride these men have
I chucked my sofa out the window and left.
Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread
Watts card was so shocking that even Hallings biased ass complained. Fight is close.
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13497
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread
When Churchill said 'we shall fight them on the beaches' he was referring to Morales v Pacquiao.Counter-puncher wrote:Brilo- when McDonnell dug in and took the last 2.rounds against Ceja, did you really not see pride in that? Do you think Manny pacquiao or Morales for that matter knows who, say, emile Griffith was? Or bob foster?
the blokes getting punched in the face for your entertainment isn't that enough for you?
as for fighting for his country? You really think in the corner round 12 to come at the end.of a torrid battle some geezers thinking 'i'm tired here but eh, queen and country, cant let the.memory of Winston Churchill down'? If you feel they are fighting for, what did you say, something about blood and country? I strongly suspect.that is a.delusion of your own choosing and that fighters fight for themselves and their family etc and that the idea.of fighting for 60 million strangers is utter bollocks, but to each their own i guess
Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread
i agree but in are on minds we make are own heroes. but when someone comes out and tells it straight it burst a bubble is all i am sayingCounter-puncher wrote:Brilo- when McDonnell dug in and took the last 2.rounds against Ceja, did you really not see pride in that? Do you think Manny pacquiao or Morales for that matter knows who, say, emile Griffith was? Or bob foster?
the blokes getting punched in the face for your entertainment isn't that enough for you?
as for fighting for his country? You really think in the corner round 12 to come at the end.of a torrid battle some geezers thinking 'i'm tired here but eh, queen and country, cant let the.memory of Winston Churchill down'? If you feel they are fighting for, what did you say, something about blood and country? I strongly suspect.that is a.delusion of your own choosing and that fighters fight for themselves and their family etc and that the idea.of fighting for 60 million strangers is utter bollocks, but to each their own i guess
Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread
96-95 McDonnell
Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread
95-95. Yegorov is not doing anything spectacular but still manages to hang in the fight.
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread
hitler was actually a useful lightweight in his dayjameswilson wrote:When Churchill said 'we shall fight them on the beaches' he was referring to Morales v Pacquiao.Counter-puncher wrote:Brilo- when McDonnell dug in and took the last 2.rounds against Ceja, did you really not see pride in that? Do you think Manny pacquiao or Morales for that matter knows who, say, emile Griffith was? Or bob foster?
the blokes getting punched in the face for your entertainment isn't that enough for you?
as for fighting for his country? You really think in the corner round 12 to come at the end.of a torrid battle some geezers thinking 'i'm tired here but eh, queen and country, cant let the.memory of Winston Churchill down'? If you feel they are fighting for, what did you say, something about blood and country? I strongly suspect.that is a.delusion of your own choosing and that fighters fight for themselves and their family etc and that the idea.of fighting for 60 million strangers is utter bollocks, but to each their own i guess
he overdid it with the home cooking though
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13497
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread
All the pecker heads saying this was a god awful fight seem to have gone quiet.
-
reggaereggae
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4723
- Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01
Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread
Counter-puncher wrote:hitler was actually a useful lightweight in his dayjameswilson wrote:When Churchill said 'we shall fight them on the beaches' he was referring to Morales v Pacquiao.Counter-puncher wrote:Brilo- when McDonnell dug in and took the last 2.rounds against Ceja, did you really not see pride in that? Do you think Manny pacquiao or Morales for that matter knows who, say, emile Griffith was? Or bob foster?
the blokes getting punched in the face for your entertainment isn't that enough for you?
as for fighting for his country? You really think in the corner round 12 to come at the end.of a torrid battle some geezers thinking 'i'm tired here but eh, queen and country, cant let the.memory of Winston Churchill down'? If you feel they are fighting for, what did you say, something about blood and country? I strongly suspect.that is a.delusion of your own choosing and that fighters fight for themselves and their family etc and that the idea.of fighting for 60 million strangers is utter bollocks, but to each their own i guess
he overdid it with the home cooking though
He had an advantage though in making weight. He only had one ball. Boom boom
Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread
That type of judgment shouldn't be based on what happens. Someone can intentionally try to create a mismatch and it can look as such based on available info even if it doesn't end up being one-sided.jameswilson wrote:All the pecker heads saying this was a god awful fight seem to have gone quiet.
Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread
115-114 Yegorov
Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread
I cant take any more of these Nick Hallings crap. He cant even tell which fighter is busier.
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread
i don't quite get it, so you'd rather they lied and said 'yeah massive fan of boxing me, student of the game, have been ever since i saw Alan 'six fingers' Atkins beat Reggie 'the ladykiller' Rogers for the central area middleweight title back in '79, big influence on me was Alan being a local boy and all, and as for Reggie what a warrior'brilo33 wrote:i agree but in are on minds we make are own heroes. but when someone comes out and tells it straight it burst a bubble is all i am sayingCounter-puncher wrote:Brilo- when McDonnell dug in and took the last 2.rounds against Ceja, did you really not see pride in that? Do you think Manny pacquiao or Morales for that matter knows who, say, emile Griffith was? Or bob foster?
the blokes getting punched in the face for your entertainment isn't that enough for you?
as for fighting for his country? You really think in the corner round 12 to come at the end.of a torrid battle some geezers thinking 'i'm tired here but eh, queen and country, cant let the.memory of Winston Churchill down'? If you feel they are fighting for, what did you say, something about blood and country? I strongly suspect.that is a.delusion of your own choosing and that fighters fight for themselves and their family etc and that the idea.of fighting for 60 million strangers is utter bollocks, but to each their own i guess
Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread
I think Watt might have been worse there.Tarkus wrote:I cant take any more of these Nick Hallings crap. He cant even tell which fighter is busier.
Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread
No man his ignorance and endless overstatements are excruciating. I would fire Watt. Halling I would hang.Horse wrote:I think Watt might have been worse there.Tarkus wrote:I cant take any more of these Nick Hallings crap. He cant even tell which fighter is busier.
Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread
These mcdonnell lads are ugly fuckers, yet theyve both got decent lookin lasses..shows what a bit of money and fame does for the fickle ladies!