Mundine V Hatley

Pureist
Super Welterweight
Posts: 1208
Joined: 06 Sep 2014, 04:11

Re: Mundine V Hatley

Post by Pureist »

Buttigeig always seems to land on the right side of S/D, nothing worse than a fighter being robbed of a well earnt win
AntonS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6406
Joined: 16 Sep 2003, 04:38

Re: Mundine V Hatley

Post by AntonS »

Like a Boss wrote:
AntonS wrote:Hatley's suspensions, albeit he won - indicating he's contested some hard fights

1 x 37 days
2 x 31
4 x 25
1 x 19
1 x 16
1 x 14
Can you elaborate on why the suspensions were imposed? Were they enforced recovery periods?
Yup! Mandatory is 8 days
AntonS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6406
Joined: 16 Sep 2003, 04:38

Re: Mundine V Hatley

Post by AntonS »

1 x 37 days - Mario Alberto Lozano
2 x 31 - Richard Gutierrez , Lanardo Tyner (lost to him TKO 1 - 7 mths inactivity going into the fight)
Like a Boss
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5863
Joined: 01 May 2012, 03:21

Re: Mundine V Hatley

Post by Like a Boss »

AntonS wrote:1 x 37 days - Mario Alberto Lozano
2 x 31 - Richard Gutierrez , Lanardo Tyner (lost to him TKO 1)
KOs are an automatic month in most parts are they not?

Still it is a surprising list of suspensions.

What are all the others for?

He actually beat Richard Gutierrez. But got 37 days? I notice Gutierrez did knock him down early in the fight.
Last edited by Like a Boss on 11 Nov 2015, 23:17, edited 1 time in total.
DA GOOSE
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1160
Joined: 06 Jan 2013, 01:48

Re: Mundine V Hatley

Post by DA GOOSE »

Like a Boss wrote:
DA GOOSE wrote:
Pureist wrote:What happened with that fight convict? Was it a good decision?
No Columban was robbed IMO.
What did you think of the main event?

I said yesterday Mundine was not looking or sounding particularly confident going into the fight and was already offering up pre-fight excuses.
Very one sided was probably over after the 2nd round but Mundine showed heart to survive as long as he did. Whether the dodgy hip,tendonitis etc excuses were real or not who knows. Mundine has in the past said his fight preparation has been bad(usually in the media to get more people to watch hoping to see him lose IMO). So who knows if he was fairdinkum or just pre rehearsed excuses to explain why he lost or to make it seem more
courageous if he had of won.
Like a Boss
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5863
Joined: 01 May 2012, 03:21

Re: Mundine V Hatley

Post by Like a Boss »

DA GOOSE wrote:
Like a Boss wrote:
DA GOOSE wrote: ]
No Columban was robbed IMO.
What did you think of the main event?

I said yesterday Mundine was not looking or sounding particularly confident going into the fight and was already offering up pre-fight excuses.
Very one sided was probably over after the 2nd round but Mundine showed heart to survive as long as he did. Whether the dodgy hip,tendonitis etc excuses were real or not who knows. Mundine has in the past said his fight preparation has been bad(usually in the media to get more people to watch hoping to see him lose IMO). So who knows if he was fairdinkum or just pre rehearsed excuses to explain why he lost or to make it seem more
courageous if he had of won.
I was almost certain I was looking at a guy in that pre-fight interview who thought he was going to lose. Mundine thrives on his own enthusiasm and in that interview he couldn't even pretend to be confident. I think he is gone and he knows it.
AntonS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6406
Joined: 16 Sep 2003, 04:38

Re: Mundine V Hatley

Post by AntonS »

Like a Boss wrote:
AntonS wrote:1 x 37 days - Mario Alberto Lozano
2 x 31 - Richard Gutierrez , Lanardo Tyner (lost to him TKO 1)
KOs are an automatic month in most parts are they not?

Still it is a surprising list of suspensions.

What are all the others for?

He actually beat Richard Gutierrez. But got 37 days? I notice Gutierrez did knock him down early in the fight.
31 days Lanardo Tyner (lost to him TKO 1 - 7 mths inactivity going into the fight)
25 days are unknown. Possibly cuts, but I didn't notice any facial marks
Like a Boss
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5863
Joined: 01 May 2012, 03:21

Re: Mundine V Hatley

Post by Like a Boss »

AntonS wrote:
Like a Boss wrote:
AntonS wrote:1 x 37 days - Mario Alberto Lozano
2 x 31 - Richard Gutierrez , Lanardo Tyner (lost to him TKO 1)
KOs are an automatic month in most parts are they not?

Still it is a surprising list of suspensions.

What are all the others for?

He actually beat Richard Gutierrez. But got 37 days? I notice Gutierrez did knock him down early in the fight.
31 days Lanardo Tyner (lost to him TKO 1 - 7 mths inactivity going into the fight)
25 days are unknown. Possibly cuts, but I didn't notice any facial marks
Not that he will likely want to fight again any time soon, but will Mundine get a suspension in order to recover from the fight last night? Hatley punched the living suitcase out of him.
AntonS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6406
Joined: 16 Sep 2003, 04:38

Re: Mundine V Hatley

Post by AntonS »

Probably just mandatory 28 days
No doubt Dr Lewis would've given Shane Tuck longer period.
Mr Icaman
Welterweight
Posts: 74
Joined: 03 Sep 2015, 22:05

Re: Mundine V Hatley

Post by Mr Icaman »

I have a feeling Shane Tuck will give himself a longer ban. Maybe lifetime one...
amwsnw
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1911
Joined: 19 Oct 2007, 03:24

Re: Mundine V Hatley

Post by amwsnw »

I really enjoyed the card.No massive names on the undercard just some really competitive fights.
For what its worth I had Buttigeig winning 77 75.
To choc, great heart mate. Just to be standing on your feet at the end you deserve all the credit in the world. Looked nothing like the fighter who not that long ago beat Ranchenko.
I know a fight with Green makes sense financially but I dont want to see it (I dare say its a done deal). Mundine has nothing to prove. If the first fight with Green was close i could understand it but I see no purpose. Hang up the gloves Anthony on what has been a fantastic career. That said, at 80kg and if he's fit he would probably start favorite against Danny regardless on last nights result.
Good luck to Hatley moving forward. This victory probably puts him in a decent fight next time around.
Like a Boss
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5863
Joined: 01 May 2012, 03:21

Re: Mundine V Hatley

Post by Like a Boss »

amwsnw wrote:I really enjoyed the card.No massive names on the undercard just some really competitive fights.
For what its worth I had Buttigeig winning 77 75.
To choc, great heart mate. Just to be standing on your feet at the end you deserve all the credit in the world. Looked nothing like the fighter who not that long ago beat Ranchenko.
I know a fight with Green makes sense financially but I dont want to see it (I dare say its a done deal). Mundine has nothing to prove. If the first fight with Green was close i could understand it but I see no purpose. Hang up the gloves Anthony on what has been a fantastic career. That said, at 80kg and if he's fit he would probably start favorite against Danny regardless on last nights result.
Good luck to Hatley moving forward. This victory probably puts him in a decent fight next time around.
It matters not what we think or say, Mundine and Green will almost certainly fight again.

All the bi-play between the pair in the media over the past few years will amount to nothing when the pens hit the paper. The only truth will be when they step into the ring again.
AntonS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6406
Joined: 16 Sep 2003, 04:38

Re: Mundine V Hatley

Post by AntonS »

Like a Boss wrote:
amwsnw wrote:I really enjoyed the card.No massive names on the undercard just some really competitive fights.
For what its worth I had Buttigeig winning 77 75.
To choc, great heart mate. Just to be standing on your feet at the end you deserve all the credit in the world. Looked nothing like the fighter who not that long ago beat Ranchenko.
I know a fight with Green makes sense financially but I dont want to see it (I dare say its a done deal). Mundine has nothing to prove. If the first fight with Green was close i could understand it but I see no purpose. Hang up the gloves Anthony on what has been a fantastic career. That said, at 80kg and if he's fit he would probably start favorite against Danny regardless on last nights result.
Good luck to Hatley moving forward. This victory probably puts him in a decent fight next time around.
It matters not what we think or say, Mundine and Green will almost certainly fight again.
If it happens, I doubt I'd be prepared to part with 50 bucks to see it. Mind you, given my popularity in this forum, I might not live long enough to reconsider ;;-)
Last night was the 1st time I subscribed to Mundine's ppv. Did so 'cos I wanted to see some of the other fights, but too lazy to venture to local RSL, which is hop, skip & jump away :lol:
bogan whisperer
Middleweight
Posts: 1668
Joined: 15 Aug 2013, 19:24

Re: Mundine V Hatley

Post by bogan whisperer »

Wonder how long it will take until they announce Mundine vs Green II? Obviously they have to sign the contract first. Perhaps they will use Green's fight, which is no longer in Boxrec by the way, to help publicise it. Ring call out. The usual drill.

What has happened to Green's fight?

Is Mundine vs Green II so far advanced Green's fight has been scrapped?
buster007
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1899
Joined: 11 Oct 2007, 00:58

Re: Mundine V Hatley

Post by buster007 »

c'mon Anton,

u know and we know u will watch it.

and so will the others on here.
AntonS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6406
Joined: 16 Sep 2003, 04:38

Re: Mundine V Hatley

Post by AntonS »

buster007 wrote:c'mon Anton,

u know and we know u will watch it.

and so will the others on here.
I might if Fenech vs Nelson is co-main
bogan whisperer
Middleweight
Posts: 1668
Joined: 15 Aug 2013, 19:24

Re: Mundine V Hatley

Post by bogan whisperer »

Image

Not hard to tell who lost.
AntonS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6406
Joined: 16 Sep 2003, 04:38

Re: Mundine V Hatley

Post by AntonS »

Wish I (now 68) looked as good :wink:
bogan whisperer
Middleweight
Posts: 1668
Joined: 15 Aug 2013, 19:24

Re: Mundine V Hatley

Post by bogan whisperer »

convict wrote:
Very strong word at the venue tonight that MUNDINE V GREEN 2 has been agreed for 2016. Signatures imminent, with the fight at 80kgs
:salut:
http://www.couriermail.com.au/sport/mor ... 7606856244

A $10 million mega-fight between ageing warriors and bitter foes Anthony Mundine and Danny Green is still firmly on the agenda, according to Australia’s biggest boxing promoter.

Melbourne businessman Brian Amatruda said on Thursday he was confident Mundine would not retire despite a demoralising and humiliating thrashing by little-known American Charles Hatley on Wednesday night.

“He and Danny will make $5m each if the fight goes ahead — it’s too much money not to fight. It’s just common sense,” he said.
AntonS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6406
Joined: 16 Sep 2003, 04:38

Re: Mundine V Hatley

Post by AntonS »

I gather Brian hadn't recovered from post show party when he made that statement. :lol:
bogan whisperer
Middleweight
Posts: 1668
Joined: 15 Aug 2013, 19:24

Re: Mundine V Hatley

Post by bogan whisperer »

AntonS wrote:I gather Brian hadn't recovered from post show party when he made that statement. :lol:
It would be a multi-million dollar fight for sure. But $10m is stretching the imagination.

For Mundine and Green it will present too good an opportunity to refuse.
Beltane
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4053
Joined: 02 Aug 2007, 02:12

Re: Mundine V Hatley

Post by Beltane »

bogan whisperer wrote:Image

Not hard to tell who lost.
Looks like Mundine still hasn't shaken off the cobwebs.
DA GOOSE
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1160
Joined: 06 Jan 2013, 01:48

Re: Mundine V Hatley

Post by DA GOOSE »

$10 million for 2 past prime 40+ year olds!!!!!! Only in Australia :salut:
bogan whisperer
Middleweight
Posts: 1668
Joined: 15 Aug 2013, 19:24

Re: Mundine V Hatley

Post by bogan whisperer »

Beltane wrote:
bogan whisperer wrote:Image

Not hard to tell who lost.
Looks like Mundine still hasn't shaken off the cobwebs.
Still looking pretty beat up too.
bogan whisperer
Middleweight
Posts: 1668
Joined: 15 Aug 2013, 19:24

Re: Mundine V Hatley

Post by bogan whisperer »

DA GOOSE wrote:$10 million for 2 past prime 40+ year olds!!!!!! Only in Australia :salut:
They don't call it the lucky country for nothing and Mundine and Green about to get real lucky. Despite all the 'experts' who claimed it would never happen :lol:
Post Reply