Page 4 of 4

Re: Fury vs Miller Late Sept. Early Oct?

Posted: 20 Jun 2019, 21:01
by tiny_acres
Ilya Muromets wrote: 20 Jun 2019, 18:17 How was he involved with child pornography?
I can't find any info on him and child pornography. I think he might be thinking of someone else

Re: Fury vs Miller Late Sept. Early Oct?

Posted: 20 Jun 2019, 23:20
by Ilya Muromets
tiny_acres wrote: 20 Jun 2019, 21:01 I can't find any info on him and child pornography. I think he might be thinking of someone else


"One time only" is a fool.

Re: Fury vs Miller Late Sept. Early Oct?

Posted: 21 Jun 2019, 00:53
by ironbeard
tiny_acres wrote: 20 Jun 2019, 21:01 I can't find any info on him and child pornography. I think he might be thinking of someone else
He was charged with possession of porn depicting underage children in sexual positions, or something along those lines. The charges were eventually dropped in a deal that restricted him from being in the company of children without parental or guardian consent for a couple of years.

Re: Fury vs Miller Late Sept. Early Oct?

Posted: 21 Jun 2019, 01:02
by Onetimeonly
Ilya Muromets wrote: 20 Jun 2019, 23:20 "One time only" is a fool.
Nobody would expect you to pay attention. Maybe the Vegas mob led by wilder set him up!

Re: Fury vs Miller Late Sept. Early Oct?

Posted: 21 Jun 2019, 01:56
by Ilya Muromets
ironbeard wrote: 21 Jun 2019, 00:53 He was charged with possession of porn depicting underage children in sexual positions, or something along those lines. The charges were eventually dropped in a deal that restricted him from being in the company of children without parental or guardian consent for a couple of years.

Well that would certainly put a different light on him, but i see he denies it was true and he wasn't convicted of it. Most Hollywood types are creeps. I thought the little creep was just caught jerking off in a porno movie theater wearing a fake beard along with all the other pervs in there (all wearing fake beards!). Anyway I still think the Big Adventure movie was very funny, but if he really is a really serious creep i withdraw my endorsement.

This thread has gone a bit far afield.

Re: Fury vs Miller Late Sept. Early Oct?

Posted: 21 Jun 2019, 05:52
by candyslim
oogiebe wrote: 20 Jun 2019, 12:13 Yup. Hard to watch after the porn theater debacle, though.
Well it's a lot to take in all on the same night Oog.

Sorry that was a joke in dreadfully bad taste. Sometimes I just can't resist even knowing that :oops:

Re: Fury vs Miller Late Sept. Early Oct?

Posted: 21 Jun 2019, 07:44
by tiny_acres
Ilya Muromets wrote: 21 Jun 2019, 01:56 Well that would certainly put a different light on him, but i see he denies it was true and he wasn't convicted of it. Most Hollywood types are creeps. I thought the little creep was just caught jerking off in a porno movie theater wearing a fake beard along with all the other pervs in there (all wearing fake beards!). Anyway I still think the Big Adventure movie was very funny, but if he really is a really serious creep i withdraw my endorsement.

This thread has gone a bit far afield.
X2 I was not aware of it either.
I just remember the masturbation incident.
Wow how the he'll is he still doing any acting.
Figure he'd 've black balled

Re: Fury vs Miller Late Sept. Early Oct?

Posted: 21 Jun 2019, 13:18
by Ilya Muromets
tiny_acres wrote: 21 Jun 2019, 07:44 X2 I was not aware of it either.
I just remember the masturbation incident.
Wow how the he'll is he still doing any acting.
Figure he'd 've black balled

Well there's no proof of it and he (naturally) denies it's true. I'll give him the benefit of the doubt for now because his movie cracks me up.


Re: Fury vs Miller Late Sept. Early Oct?

Posted: 21 Jun 2019, 13:32
by Onetimeonly
Yeah, give him the benefit of doubt. You're certainly not one to sling around accusations without proof. :roll:

Re: Fury vs Miller Late Sept. Early Oct?

Posted: 21 Jun 2019, 13:55
by HomicideHenry
https://www.nationalenquirer.com/crime- ... n-scandal/

It happened back in 2002.

Reubens I believe was cleared of all charges because the pornography was basically either art or vintage pictures from decades ago, and Reubens swore up and down all he was guilty of was being an art collector. I think the bulk of the material raided from his home was vintage bodybuilding magazines or something to that extent.

Regardless, it's certainly effected how I view him. The masturbating in an adult theater was something you could have overlooked because WTH else are those places for anyways, but....

When it comes to things like this it's really bizarre and disturbing. Even if he wasn't some sort of sicko, it's certainly unwise and unintelligent to be a collector of art or photography that is extremely questionable. You'd have to be one dense sonofabitch not to see how weird and wrong that is.

I've always heard he was either gay or bisexual, and I've even heard he was asexual. But, it's strange. Regardless of his orientation there's no excuses for that because it's unacceptable.