Dolan all set
Re: Dolan all set
Good on Dolan for putting himself in the mix like this so early. I'll watch him again for sure. He doesn't lose anything being involved in fights like this.
-
whatashambles
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 668
- Joined: 14 Nov 2006, 13:30
Re: Dolan all set
Was a 116-109 scorecard possible? Two knockdowns in one round and another knockdown in another round would mean a 10-7 round and a 10-8 round, therefore he would have lost 5 points straight away?
-
black panther
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4097
- Joined: 11 Dec 2003, 07:06
Re: Dolan all set
Bloody Hell how many knockdowns in that fight altogether? Thanks for the rbr fellas - fight sounded a cracker!
Re: Dolan all set
It's all possible.........I only saw my first 5 minute 10 second round last week in the Urango fight.whatashambles wrote:Was a 116-109 scorecard possible? Two knockdowns in one round and another knockdown in another round would mean a 10-7 round and a 10-8 round, therefore he would have lost 5 points straight away?
-
Old bones Ian
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 11806
- Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33
Re: Dolan all set
Couple of the KD's were debatable, so maybe the judges didn't score themPongsaklek wrote:116-109 to the winner in a fight he gets knocked down in two different rounds and a total of three times is very creative scoring. Dolan won at least four rounds imho.![]()
Re: Dolan all set
How can they not score them?Old bones Ian wrote:Couple of the KD's were debatable, so maybe the judges didn't score themPongsaklek wrote:116-109 to the winner in a fight he gets knocked down in two different rounds and a total of three times is very creative scoring. Dolan won at least four rounds imho.![]()
Re: Dolan all set
I wish, I saw this fight. Hopefully it will be on Yourtube.
Re: Dolan all set
Thanks. I saw the Huck vs Battelo fight but must have missed Licina.Dioufy wrote:I have only seen him once, on the Huck Vs Battelo undercard. He looked okay, although he did get put over, but he did recover quite quickly and stopped his man later in the fight with some great shots. I will keep my eye out for him in future fights.Asterix wrote:Does anyone know anything about Enad Licina?
-
Old bones Ian
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 11806
- Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33
Re: Dolan all set
Well i don't know the rules exactly, but i thought the judges are lead by the ref, but do not always have to agree, i could be wrongHorse wrote:How can they not score them?Old bones Ian wrote:Couple of the KD's were debatable, so maybe the judges didn't score themPongsaklek wrote:116-109 to the winner in a fight he gets knocked down in two different rounds and a total of three times is very creative scoring. Dolan won at least four rounds imho.![]()
Re: Dolan all set
I didn't see the fight but I must confess that given Norton-Steeds I expected this would be a stinker and gave it a wide berth. However, it turned out to be one of the best rbr's we have read here
Whoever mentioned Enad Licina...seen him 3 or 4 times now and he has nice skills, good basic boxer but seems fragile and I reckon he would fold like an envelope if you "stuck it up him" so to speak! Not convinced he's top level material and Sauerland will match him carefully.
Whoever mentioned Enad Licina...seen him 3 or 4 times now and he has nice skills, good basic boxer but seems fragile and I reckon he would fold like an envelope if you "stuck it up him" so to speak! Not convinced he's top level material and Sauerland will match him carefully.
Re: Dolan all set
It was a good fight. I'm more of a fan of higher level boxing, but it was really good.steve689 wrote:I didn't see the fight but I must confess that given Norton-Steeds I expected this would be a stinker and gave it a wide berth. However, it turned out to be one of the best rbr's we have read here![]()
Whoever mentioned Enad Licina...seen him 3 or 4 times now and he has nice skills, good basic boxer but seems fragile and I reckon he would fold like an envelope if you "stuck it up him" so to speak! Not convinced he's top level material and Sauerland will match him carefully.
Thanks for the info on Licina. He's got a nice rating for someone to take then.
Re: Dolan all set
Sexy fight - I had it 112/111, which is a bizarre score. And didn't that second KD in the 4th come from a head, not a punch?
Re: Dolan all set
It was a punch. The angle from the corner made it look like a head, but another angle showed Norton's chin was hit right on the tip.Dioufy wrote:Sexy fight - I had it 112/111, which is a bizarre score. And didn't that second KD in the 4th come from a head, not a punch?
Re: Dolan all set
I thought so.Dioufy wrote:And didn't that second KD in the 4th come from a head, not a punch?
Re: Dolan all set
I have seen the angles Sky have produced and I'm certain a punch didn't land - if it did then I apoligise.
-
Hagler2002
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3512
- Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04
Re: Dolan all set
Dolan was very small in there tonight, I wouldn't be surprised if he could make SM
Re: Dolan all set
It's funny, he looked small at Heavyweight but looks just as small at Cruiser. Maybe Light Heavy should be his next target.Hagler2002 wrote:Dolan was very small in there tonight, I wouldn't be surprised if he could make SM
In all seriousness though, Dolan looked quite slow tonight and showed very, very little head movement. Big step backwards from Prizefighter, imo. :(
-
Hagler2002
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3512
- Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04
Re: Dolan all set
Mr Bilton could stop a moving train, I'm glad I seen this thread before getting involvedAsterix wrote:I think Dolan will win.Hagler2002 wrote:I was going to have a decent size bet on Dolan @ 5/4 until I seen this thread :(
Norton it is then.
Re: Dolan all set
Now you see why I don't bet real money.Hagler2002 wrote:Mr Bilton could stop a moving train, I'm glad I seen this thread before getting involvedAsterix wrote:I think Dolan will win.Hagler2002 wrote:I was going to have a decent size bet on Dolan @ 5/4 until I seen this thread :(
Norton it is then.
-
Hagler2002
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3512
- Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04
Re: Dolan all set
Do you work at the 'Jockey'Old bones Ian wrote:Both boxers look up for this, Norton looks in great shape.
I've left work at 9.45, and it was all going a bit pete tong there, had to break up a cat fight, and the local dope dealer was trying to get in the project.
-
Old bones Ian
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 11806
- Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33
Re: Dolan all set
No mateHagler2002 wrote:Do you work at the 'Jockey'Old bones Ian wrote:Both boxers look up for this, Norton looks in great shape.
I've left work at 9.45, and it was all going a bit pete tong there, had to break up a cat fight, and the local dope dealer was trying to get in the project.
I do a part time job as a youth project worker, i'm no doorman and if you saw me you'd know why, i'm not exactly imtimidating.
But i know when to get involved, and by god those girls can pull hair,
-
Hagler2002
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3512
- Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04
-
Hagler2002
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3512
- Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04
-
forcefraser
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5451
- Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15
Re: Dolan all set
Good fight. The second knockown on Norton was a peach. His powers of recovery are immense.
I agree that Norton edged it, but no way was it 116-109, that judge must have been watching a different fight.
Young Mutley looked in decent shape as well
I agree that Norton edged it, but no way was it 116-109, that judge must have been watching a different fight.
Young Mutley looked in decent shape as well
Re: Dolan all set
whatashambles wrote:Was a 116-109 scorecard possible? Two knockdowns in one round and another knockdown in another round would mean a 10-7 round and a 10-8 round, therefore he would have lost 5 points straight away?
10-7 is only given when a fighter clearly totally dominates the oppoent and puts him down several times, eg Enzo Maccarinellis first round V Matthew Ellis.
A judge does not actually HAVE to give 10-8 or 10-7, if for example he feels that fighter knocked down slipped, or simply they were incidental/flash knockdowns etc.
If the guy knocked down clearly wins the round, then I think it is scored 10-9 (against him) , but I'm not 100% sure of this.
So a score of 116 could suggest that the ref felt he lost those rounds as 10-8s, but either won or drew every other one, or that he actually won a round in which he was knocked down.