BoxRec

jwfg wrote: ↑09 Mar 2024, 15:22

TheLeprechaun wrote: ↑09 Mar 2024, 14:58

jwfg wrote: ↑09 Mar 2024, 11:36

No, betting is about winning and losing. There is zero value in a losing bet, ZERO. I bet on AJ when he was 1/4, then again at 2/7 and even more at 1/3. Guess who won all of his bets last night? Me.

You still "think it's a bad bet"?

That was a good bet. It turns out that Joshua was probably more accurately priced at about 1/20. Definitely would be near that if they had a rematch.

You don't understand gambling and will end up losing your dosh mate.

So it was a bad bet last night at 2/7, but today it's a good one? Maybe it's you who doesn't understand betting.

Since September, I've had a 1,712.2% return on my original stake from betting.

jwfg wrote: ↑09 Mar 2024, 15:22

TheLeprechaun wrote: ↑09 Mar 2024, 14:58

jwfg wrote: ↑09 Mar 2024, 11:36

No, betting is about winning and losing. There is zero value in a losing bet, ZERO. I bet on AJ when he was 1/4, then again at 2/7 and even more at 1/3. Guess who won all of his bets last night? Me.

You still "think it's a bad bet"?

That was a good bet. It turns out that Joshua was probably more accurately priced at about 1/20. Definitely would be near that if they had a rematch.

You don't understand gambling and will end up losing your dosh mate.

So it was a bad bet last night at 2/7, but today it's a good one? Maybe it's you who doesn't understand betting.

Since September, I've had a 1,712.2% return on my original stake from betting.

TheLeprechaun wrote: ↑09 Mar 2024, 20:19

jwfg wrote: ↑09 Mar 2024, 15:22

TheLeprechaun wrote: ↑09 Mar 2024, 14:58

That was a good bet. It turns out that Joshua was probably more accurately priced at about 1/20. Definitely would be near that if they had a rematch.

You don't understand gambling and will end up losing your dosh mate.

So it was a bad bet last night at 2/7, but today it's a good one? Maybe it's you who doesn't understand betting.

Since September, I've had a 1,712.2% return on my original stake from betting.

I thought it was a bad bet before the fight but judging by the fact that he looked a 1/20 shot you have to say that it had value at 2/7.

I've got 1.5k on William Zepeda to KO Maxi Hughes at 1.62. That's what you call a good bet.

jwfg wrote: ↑10 Mar 2024, 07:36

TheLeprechaun wrote: ↑09 Mar 2024, 20:19

jwfg wrote: ↑09 Mar 2024, 15:22

So it was a bad bet last night at 2/7, but today it's a good one? Maybe it's you who doesn't understand betting.

Since September, I've had a 1,712.2% return on my original stake from betting.

I thought it was a bad bet before the fight but judging by the fact that he looked a 1/20 shot you have to say that it had value at 2/7.

I've got 1.5k on William Zepeda to KO Maxi Hughes at 1.62. That's what you call a good bet.

Only if it wins mate. Good luck, I hope it comes in.

SeanBrennan wrote: ↑11 Mar 2024, 19:09

jwfg wrote: ↑10 Mar 2024, 07:36

TheLeprechaun wrote: ↑09 Mar 2024, 20:19


I thought it was a bad bet before the fight but judging by the fact that he looked a 1/20 shot you have to say that it had value at 2/7.

I've got 1.5k on William Zepeda to KO Maxi Hughes at 1.62. That's what you call a good bet.

Only if it wins mate. Good luck, I hope it comes in.

jesus does that mean you've bet £1500?

The_Don1 wrote: ↑12 Mar 2024, 07:46

SeanBrennan wrote: ↑11 Mar 2024, 19:09

jwfg wrote: ↑10 Mar 2024, 07:36

Only if it wins mate. Good luck, I hope it comes in.

jesus does that mean you've bet £1500?

sounds like it, stands to win £930 should it come in, as the price is now 1.28, I'd say it's a good bet regardless of whether it lands or not.

TheLeprechaun wrote: ↑09 Mar 2024, 20:19

jwfg wrote: ↑09 Mar 2024, 15:22

TheLeprechaun wrote: ↑09 Mar 2024, 14:58

Claiming casino bonuses can sometimes seem like a risky strategy, but with the right knowledge, it can be a winning strategy. Understanding the odds and value of each offer is key to maximizing profits. At AussieCasinoReviewer you will find reviews of various casinos with different bonuses, such as the free spins no deposit bonus. These reviews can help you navigate the world of bonuses and find the best deals for your gaming style.

So it was a bad bet last night at 2/7, but today it's a good one? Maybe it's you who doesn't understand betting.

Since September, I've had a 1,712.2% return on my original stake from betting.

I thought it was a bad bet before the fight but judging by the fact that he looked a 1/20 shot you have to say that it had value at 2/7.

I've got 1.5k on William Zepeda to KO Maxi Hughes at 1.62. That's what you call a good bet.

1504017 wrote: ↑18 Mar 2024, 14:44

TheLeprechaun wrote: ↑09 Mar 2024, 20:19

jwfg wrote: ↑09 Mar 2024, 15:22

So it was a bad bet last night at 2/7, but today it's a good one? Maybe it's you who doesn't understand betting.

Since September, I've had a 1,712.2% return on my original stake from betting.

I thought it was a bad bet before the fight but judging by the fact that he looked a 1/20 shot you have to say that it had value at 2/7.

I've got 1.5k on William Zepeda to KO Maxi Hughes at 1.62. That's what you call a good bet.

Wow, that's not just a good bet, it's a super good bet

TheLeprechaun wrote: ↑19 Mar 2024, 16:29 I'm watching Campbell Hattons opponent and I'd love to bet him but the robbery that Hatton got before (Marcus McDonnell bent as a two bob note in that one) really puts me off sadly.

TheLeprechaun wrote: ↑19 Mar 2024, 17:47 You know they will roll out Markus McDonnell again. As Frank (Kellie) Maloney used to say - At least Dick Turpin wore a mask when he robbed you.

I'm not sure what the upside of Campbell getting helped to wins over journeymen types is? He's not going to become an operator at Brit level, nevermind World level.

cutsman wrote: ↑17 May 2024, 05:45 Any value to be had on the undercard of Fury v Usyk?
I’m picking Usyk for the main event but IMO it’s a 50/50 fight reflected in the odds

cutsman wrote: ↑17 May 2024, 05:45 Any value to be had on the undercard of Fury v Usyk?
I’m picking Usyk for the main event but IMO it’s a 50/50 fight reflected in the odds

cutsman wrote: ↑17 May 2024, 05:45 Any value to be had on the undercard of Fury v Usyk?
I’m picking Usyk for the main event but IMO it’s a 50/50 fight reflected in the odds

WestEndRiot wrote: ↑17 May 2024, 11:15

cutsman wrote: ↑17 May 2024, 05:45 Any value to be had on the undercard of Fury v Usyk?
I’m picking Usyk for the main event but IMO it’s a 50/50 fight reflected in the odds

I like Kabayal to best Sanchez at 13/8. He looked good last time out, and Sanchez hasn't overly impressed me.

Another one is Moses Itauma. He's widely expected to get the early KO, but the prices for round betting are mental as you get to R4 and beyond, gotta be worth a quid or 2

jwfg wrote: ↑17 May 2024, 11:19

WestEndRiot wrote: ↑17 May 2024, 11:15

cutsman wrote: ↑17 May 2024, 05:45 Any value to be had on the undercard of Fury v Usyk?
I’m picking Usyk for the main event but IMO it’s a 50/50 fight reflected in the odds

I like Kabayal to best Sanchez at 13/8. He looked good last time out, and Sanchez hasn't overly impressed me.

Another one is Moses Itauma. He's widely expected to get the early KO, but the prices for round betting are mental as you get to R4 and beyond, gotta be worth a quid or 2

1/20 for Moses by stoppage is good value, I had to shop around a fair bit to get it, but it's good value. 5% return on your money.

WestEndRiot wrote: ↑17 May 2024, 11:49

jwfg wrote: ↑17 May 2024, 11:19

WestEndRiot wrote: ↑17 May 2024, 11:15

I like Kabayal to best Sanchez at 13/8. He looked good last time out, and Sanchez hasn't overly impressed me.

Another one is Moses Itauma. He's widely expected to get the early KO, but the prices for round betting are mental as you get to R4 and beyond, gotta be worth a quid or 2

1/20 for Moses by stoppage is good value, I had to shop around a fair bit to get it, but it's good value. 5% return on your money.

Just to be clear, what i specifically meant was Moses in...
R5 40/1,
R6 66/1
R7 100/1 &
R8 100/1