Can Chagaev beat Lurch again?
Posted: 17 May 2009, 06:05
Lurch was lucky against Holyfield and got outboxed by Chagaev the last time.
Surely Lurch will get beaten again?
Surely Lurch will get beaten again?
Trouble is there are degrees of contention with the Donald, Ruiz I and Holyfield fights, which largely leaves you with Lyakovich and Barret - I think people are hard on him. I htink he is the fight Vitaly should have been targetting for his comeback.oliverfennell wrote:Valuev is underrated, I feel. Not exciting by any means, but people always go on as if he'll be soundly defeated by the first decent heavyweight he faces - forgetting that he's already beaten quite a lot of decent heavyweights! OK, he's unconvincing and boring in a weak era, but the results speak for themselves - wins over Donald, Ruiz, Lyakovich, even Barrett and Holyfield, may not be the stuff of legends but they are the stuff of a world class heavyweioght at this time. Chagaev doesn't exactly set the pulse racing either. I think that contrary to the opinions above, a win for Valuev is better for boxing because at least the belt will stay with someone who's known to the wider public. He's "that 7-foot Russian", while Chagaev is "just another Russian" (I know he's Uzbeki, but you get the point).
Yes I realise they were close fights with a sizeable body of opinion saying he lost them. However "frauds", "jokes", "bums" or whatever other labels are flung at Valuev, do not even go to close decisions in that class.DavidPayne wrote:Trouble is there are degrees of contention with the Donald, Ruiz I and Holyfield fights, which largely leaves you with Lyakovich and Barret - I think people are hard on him. I htink he is the fight Vitaly should have been targetting for his comeback.oliverfennell wrote:Valuev is underrated, I feel. Not exciting by any means, but people always go on as if he'll be soundly defeated by the first decent heavyweight he faces - forgetting that he's already beaten quite a lot of decent heavyweights! OK, he's unconvincing and boring in a weak era, but the results speak for themselves - wins over Donald, Ruiz, Lyakovich, even Barrett and Holyfield, may not be the stuff of legends but they are the stuff of a world class heavyweioght at this time. Chagaev doesn't exactly set the pulse racing either. I think that contrary to the opinions above, a win for Valuev is better for boxing because at least the belt will stay with someone who's known to the wider public. He's "that 7-foot Russian", while Chagaev is "just another Russian" (I know he's Uzbeki, but you get the point).