Page 1 of 1

Can Chagaev beat Lurch again?

Posted: 17 May 2009, 06:05
by confirmation
Lurch was lucky against Holyfield and got outboxed by Chagaev the last time.

Surely Lurch will get beaten again?

Re: Can Chagaev beat Lurch again?

Posted: 17 May 2009, 06:28
by Bomber 1
I'll go for Chagev by points unan... :wink:

Re: Can Chagaev beat Lurch again?

Posted: 17 May 2009, 07:24
by stujones
Its a tough one to call, fight 1 was a close one, and Chagaev has been so inactive through injury.

Re: Can Chagaev beat Lurch again?

Posted: 17 May 2009, 07:29
by banjo
Lurch, lol

Re: Can Chagaev beat Lurch again?

Posted: 17 May 2009, 12:41
by TerribleTerry
I hope so.

The big fellar has improved from side show freak to a decent enough boxer - he has certainly mastered the basics and doesn't look as dis jointed as most fighters over 6 and a half feet tend to.

That said I dont really relish another championship run from him. I hope Chagaev can outbox him and take a points win.

One behemoth was felled last night (Semmy Schilt in a K1 rules match) I am hoping Chagaev can make it two :box:

Re: Can Chagaev beat Lurch again?

Posted: 17 May 2009, 12:57
by confirmation
Agreed. I think everyone is hoping that Chagaev does us all a favour and disposes of Lurch. But Lurch tends to get the best of dodgy decisions so it really is a very tough fight to call.

Re: Can Chagaev beat Lurch again?

Posted: 17 May 2009, 13:17
by gobbles
I think Lurch will win big. He looked like he didn't want to punch Holyfield, but he's improved a lot since the first fight and he's not going to let Chagaev steal it like last time.

Re: Can Chagaev beat Lurch again?

Posted: 17 May 2009, 14:41
by Asterix
I agree with Bomber, Chagaev should win on points.

Re: Can Chagaev beat Lurch again?

Posted: 20 May 2009, 04:55
by oliverfennell
Valuev is underrated, I feel. Not exciting by any means, but people always go on as if he'll be soundly defeated by the first decent heavyweight he faces - forgetting that he's already beaten quite a lot of decent heavyweights! OK, he's unconvincing and boring in a weak era, but the results speak for themselves - wins over Donald, Ruiz, Lyakovich, even Barrett and Holyfield, may not be the stuff of legends but they are the stuff of a world class heavyweioght at this time. Chagaev doesn't exactly set the pulse racing either. I think that contrary to the opinions above, a win for Valuev is better for boxing because at least the belt will stay with someone who's known to the wider public. He's "that 7-foot Russian", while Chagaev is "just another Russian" (I know he's Uzbeki, but you get the point).

Re: Can Chagaev beat Lurch again?

Posted: 20 May 2009, 04:59
by Adamj1987
chagaev on points

Re: Can Chagaev beat Lurch again?

Posted: 20 May 2009, 05:15
by DavidPayne
oliverfennell wrote:Valuev is underrated, I feel. Not exciting by any means, but people always go on as if he'll be soundly defeated by the first decent heavyweight he faces - forgetting that he's already beaten quite a lot of decent heavyweights! OK, he's unconvincing and boring in a weak era, but the results speak for themselves - wins over Donald, Ruiz, Lyakovich, even Barrett and Holyfield, may not be the stuff of legends but they are the stuff of a world class heavyweioght at this time. Chagaev doesn't exactly set the pulse racing either. I think that contrary to the opinions above, a win for Valuev is better for boxing because at least the belt will stay with someone who's known to the wider public. He's "that 7-foot Russian", while Chagaev is "just another Russian" (I know he's Uzbeki, but you get the point).
Trouble is there are degrees of contention with the Donald, Ruiz I and Holyfield fights, which largely leaves you with Lyakovich and Barret - I think people are hard on him. I htink he is the fight Vitaly should have been targetting for his comeback.

Re: Can Chagaev beat Lurch again?

Posted: 20 May 2009, 05:21
by oliverfennell
DavidPayne wrote:
oliverfennell wrote:Valuev is underrated, I feel. Not exciting by any means, but people always go on as if he'll be soundly defeated by the first decent heavyweight he faces - forgetting that he's already beaten quite a lot of decent heavyweights! OK, he's unconvincing and boring in a weak era, but the results speak for themselves - wins over Donald, Ruiz, Lyakovich, even Barrett and Holyfield, may not be the stuff of legends but they are the stuff of a world class heavyweioght at this time. Chagaev doesn't exactly set the pulse racing either. I think that contrary to the opinions above, a win for Valuev is better for boxing because at least the belt will stay with someone who's known to the wider public. He's "that 7-foot Russian", while Chagaev is "just another Russian" (I know he's Uzbeki, but you get the point).
Trouble is there are degrees of contention with the Donald, Ruiz I and Holyfield fights, which largely leaves you with Lyakovich and Barret - I think people are hard on him. I htink he is the fight Vitaly should have been targetting for his comeback.
Yes I realise they were close fights with a sizeable body of opinion saying he lost them. However "frauds", "jokes", "bums" or whatever other labels are flung at Valuev, do not even go to close decisions in that class.