Can Chagaev beat Lurch again?

Post Reply
confirmation
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Can Chagaev beat Lurch again?

Post by confirmation »

Lurch was lucky against Holyfield and got outboxed by Chagaev the last time.

Surely Lurch will get beaten again?
Bomber 1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1697
Joined: 06 Jan 2009, 09:44

Re: Can Chagaev beat Lurch again?

Post by Bomber 1 »

I'll go for Chagev by points unan... :wink:
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27508
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Can Chagaev beat Lurch again?

Post by stujones »

Its a tough one to call, fight 1 was a close one, and Chagaev has been so inactive through injury.
banjo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 26446
Joined: 20 Nov 2007, 03:17

Re: Can Chagaev beat Lurch again?

Post by banjo »

Lurch, lol
TerribleTerry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5272
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:30

Re: Can Chagaev beat Lurch again?

Post by TerribleTerry »

I hope so.

The big fellar has improved from side show freak to a decent enough boxer - he has certainly mastered the basics and doesn't look as dis jointed as most fighters over 6 and a half feet tend to.

That said I dont really relish another championship run from him. I hope Chagaev can outbox him and take a points win.

One behemoth was felled last night (Semmy Schilt in a K1 rules match) I am hoping Chagaev can make it two :box:
confirmation
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Can Chagaev beat Lurch again?

Post by confirmation »

Agreed. I think everyone is hoping that Chagaev does us all a favour and disposes of Lurch. But Lurch tends to get the best of dodgy decisions so it really is a very tough fight to call.
gobbles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2682
Joined: 18 Dec 2003, 15:04

Re: Can Chagaev beat Lurch again?

Post by gobbles »

I think Lurch will win big. He looked like he didn't want to punch Holyfield, but he's improved a lot since the first fight and he's not going to let Chagaev steal it like last time.
Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: Can Chagaev beat Lurch again?

Post by Asterix »

I agree with Bomber, Chagaev should win on points.
oliverfennell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5564
Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37

Re: Can Chagaev beat Lurch again?

Post by oliverfennell »

Valuev is underrated, I feel. Not exciting by any means, but people always go on as if he'll be soundly defeated by the first decent heavyweight he faces - forgetting that he's already beaten quite a lot of decent heavyweights! OK, he's unconvincing and boring in a weak era, but the results speak for themselves - wins over Donald, Ruiz, Lyakovich, even Barrett and Holyfield, may not be the stuff of legends but they are the stuff of a world class heavyweioght at this time. Chagaev doesn't exactly set the pulse racing either. I think that contrary to the opinions above, a win for Valuev is better for boxing because at least the belt will stay with someone who's known to the wider public. He's "that 7-foot Russian", while Chagaev is "just another Russian" (I know he's Uzbeki, but you get the point).
Adamj1987
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5400
Joined: 14 Oct 2008, 16:16

Re: Can Chagaev beat Lurch again?

Post by Adamj1987 »

chagaev on points
DavidPayne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6248
Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00

Re: Can Chagaev beat Lurch again?

Post by DavidPayne »

oliverfennell wrote:Valuev is underrated, I feel. Not exciting by any means, but people always go on as if he'll be soundly defeated by the first decent heavyweight he faces - forgetting that he's already beaten quite a lot of decent heavyweights! OK, he's unconvincing and boring in a weak era, but the results speak for themselves - wins over Donald, Ruiz, Lyakovich, even Barrett and Holyfield, may not be the stuff of legends but they are the stuff of a world class heavyweioght at this time. Chagaev doesn't exactly set the pulse racing either. I think that contrary to the opinions above, a win for Valuev is better for boxing because at least the belt will stay with someone who's known to the wider public. He's "that 7-foot Russian", while Chagaev is "just another Russian" (I know he's Uzbeki, but you get the point).
Trouble is there are degrees of contention with the Donald, Ruiz I and Holyfield fights, which largely leaves you with Lyakovich and Barret - I think people are hard on him. I htink he is the fight Vitaly should have been targetting for his comeback.
oliverfennell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5564
Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37

Re: Can Chagaev beat Lurch again?

Post by oliverfennell »

DavidPayne wrote:
oliverfennell wrote:Valuev is underrated, I feel. Not exciting by any means, but people always go on as if he'll be soundly defeated by the first decent heavyweight he faces - forgetting that he's already beaten quite a lot of decent heavyweights! OK, he's unconvincing and boring in a weak era, but the results speak for themselves - wins over Donald, Ruiz, Lyakovich, even Barrett and Holyfield, may not be the stuff of legends but they are the stuff of a world class heavyweioght at this time. Chagaev doesn't exactly set the pulse racing either. I think that contrary to the opinions above, a win for Valuev is better for boxing because at least the belt will stay with someone who's known to the wider public. He's "that 7-foot Russian", while Chagaev is "just another Russian" (I know he's Uzbeki, but you get the point).
Trouble is there are degrees of contention with the Donald, Ruiz I and Holyfield fights, which largely leaves you with Lyakovich and Barret - I think people are hard on him. I htink he is the fight Vitaly should have been targetting for his comeback.
Yes I realise they were close fights with a sizeable body of opinion saying he lost them. However "frauds", "jokes", "bums" or whatever other labels are flung at Valuev, do not even go to close decisions in that class.
Post Reply