Chambers v Dimitrenko
Posted: 04 Jul 2009, 12:36
Anyone know if this is on sky?
http://www.secondsout.com/world-boxing- ... in-hamburgsteve689 wrote:Has Chambers actually come in ripped shape this time? I heard he was 208llb.
Dimitrenko willwin a decision unless Eddie finds a way to hurt him, which is not out of the question.
Are you en France? Or watching by stream?REAL_DEAL wrote:i am watching Monshipour/moreno at the moment
He also had M´baye beating Kotelnik in the re, maybe he is trying to make up for that injustice.Autobarn wrote:Dimitrenko is terrible, but it's good that Chambers has been applying his talent.
113-113 - ha! will paul thomas be getting plenty more work over there, then?
not that i'm saying anything improper happened, and i don't think it's wise to 2nd guess judges all the time, but scoring a one-sided fight even is very odd. then again, maybe it's not.
no way, not at all. he was well outworked by a flu ridden povetkin, who seemed to take his heart. he was probably 5 point away from winning, was chambers. chambers is a good heavyweight and povetkin beat him. it's funny hopw chambers gets credit for his wins but povetkin never got credit for beating chambers.Eraserhead wrote:Chambers is a quality little heavyweight and a real dangerman. He's now beaten Peter and Dimitrenko in succession and could have easily added Povetkin to that list if he believed in himself a bit more. He was probably only one or two rounds away from beating Povetkin.
He's probably got a right to claim he's the third best heavy out there right now.
If he's so utterly useless, why couldn't Povetkin get anywhere close to hurting or stopping him? Sure, Chambers got outworked over the stretch, but I remember him bouncing right hands off Povetkin's jaw for most of the fight. It was a very, very competitive fight.Autobarn wrote:no way, not at all. he was well outworked by a flu ridden povetkin, who seemed to take his heart. he was probably 5 point away from winning, was chambers. chambers is a good heavyweight and povetkin beat him. it's funny hopw chambers gets credit for his wins but povetkin never got credit for beating chambers.Eraserhead wrote:Chambers is a quality little heavyweight and a real dangerman. He's now beaten Peter and Dimitrenko in succession and could have easily added Povetkin to that list if he believed in himself a bit more. He was probably only one or two rounds away from beating Povetkin.
He's probably got a right to claim he's the third best heavy out there right now.
povetkin and dimitrenko are leagues apart. one is good, one is utterly useless.
Er, Autobarn said Dimitrenko is useless, not Chambers.Eraserhead wrote:If he's so utterly useless, why couldn't Povetkin get anywhere close to hurting or stopping him? Sure, Chambers got outworked over the stretch, but I remember him bouncing right hands off Povetkin's jaw for most of the fight. It was a very, very competitive fight.Autobarn wrote:no way, not at all. he was well outworked by a flu ridden povetkin, who seemed to take his heart. he was probably 5 point away from winning, was chambers. chambers is a good heavyweight and povetkin beat him. it's funny hopw chambers gets credit for his wins but povetkin never got credit for beating chambers.Eraserhead wrote:Chambers is a quality little heavyweight and a real dangerman. He's now beaten Peter and Dimitrenko in succession and could have easily added Povetkin to that list if he believed in himself a bit more. He was probably only one or two rounds away from beating Povetkin.
He's probably got a right to claim he's the third best heavy out there right now.
povetkin and dimitrenko are leagues apart. one is good, one is utterly useless.
Er, Autobarn said Dimitrenko is useless, not Chambers.[/quote]Asterix wrote:If he's so utterly useless, why couldn't Povetkin get anywhere close to hurting or stopping him? Sure, Chambers got outworked over the stretch, but I remember him bouncing right hands off Povetkin's jaw for most of the fight. It was a very, very competitive fight.Eraserhead wrote:povetkin and dimitrenko are leagues apart. one is good, one is utterly useless.