Page 1 of 2

Chambers v Dimitrenko

Posted: 04 Jul 2009, 12:36
by London Boy
Anyone know if this is on sky?

Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko

Posted: 04 Jul 2009, 13:30
by brian13
No but there are plenty of links to streams on the net.

Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko

Posted: 04 Jul 2009, 13:57
by Horse
What time does it start?

Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko

Posted: 04 Jul 2009, 14:05
by steve689
Has Chambers actually come in ripped shape this time? I heard he was 208llb.

Dimitrenko willwin a decision unless Eddie finds a way to hurt him, which is not out of the question.

Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko

Posted: 04 Jul 2009, 14:07
by Asterix
9:00

Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko

Posted: 04 Jul 2009, 14:09
by Asterix
steve689 wrote:Has Chambers actually come in ripped shape this time? I heard he was 208llb.

Dimitrenko willwin a decision unless Eddie finds a way to hurt him, which is not out of the question.
http://www.secondsout.com/world-boxing- ... in-hamburg

Chambers could very easily make cruiserweight, which is where I think he might go if he loses this fight.

Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko

Posted: 04 Jul 2009, 14:10
by Dioufy
Should be at cruiser.

Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko

Posted: 04 Jul 2009, 14:11
by Asterix

Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko

Posted: 04 Jul 2009, 14:47
by MightyWarrior
Anyone PM me a decent stream please? Should be around 10pm UK time, I guess..usualy is in Germany.

Dimi may have a shaky chin, but they've been careful matching him..

Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko

Posted: 04 Jul 2009, 14:52
by Asterix
My paid stream says it starts at 9 PM, so be ready then just in case. :TU:

Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko

Posted: 04 Jul 2009, 14:57
by MightyWarrior
Thanks will do, you'll probably get an undercard fight first.
Watching Independence day with my kids at the moment, so may fall asleep.......

Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko

Posted: 04 Jul 2009, 14:59
by REAL_DEAL
i am watching Monshipour/moreno at the moment

Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko

Posted: 04 Jul 2009, 15:03
by Asterix
REAL_DEAL wrote:i am watching Monshipour/moreno at the moment
Are you en France? Or watching by stream?

Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko

Posted: 04 Jul 2009, 15:07
by REAL_DEAL
neither satellite.

Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko

Posted: 04 Jul 2009, 15:20
by Asterix
Cheers. Just curious.

Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko

Posted: 04 Jul 2009, 17:19
by Old bones Ian
Chambers wins on points, this includes a standing count against Dimitrenko in round 7, he was also knocked down in round 10, yet british judge Paul Thomas (who i have alot of respect for) scored it 113-113. work that one out!!

Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko

Posted: 04 Jul 2009, 17:26
by Asterix
Chambers battered Dimitrenko. It wasn't close at all. I bet the punch stats look impressive. Chambers would be a force at cruiserweight. He was still a bit fleshy at 208 (or 205) lbs.

Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko

Posted: 04 Jul 2009, 18:25
by Autobarn
Dimitrenko is terrible, but it's good that Chambers has been applying his talent.

113-113 - ha! will paul thomas be getting plenty more work over there, then?

not that i'm saying anything improper happened, and i don't think it's wise to 2nd guess judges all the time, but scoring a one-sided fight even is very odd. then again, maybe it's not.

Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko

Posted: 04 Jul 2009, 18:41
by Pongsaklek
Autobarn wrote:Dimitrenko is terrible, but it's good that Chambers has been applying his talent.

113-113 - ha! will paul thomas be getting plenty more work over there, then?

not that i'm saying anything improper happened, and i don't think it's wise to 2nd guess judges all the time, but scoring a one-sided fight even is very odd. then again, maybe it's not.
He also had M´baye beating Kotelnik in the re, maybe he is trying to make up for that injustice. :lol:

Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko

Posted: 05 Jul 2009, 05:28
by Eraserhead
Chambers is a quality little heavyweight and a real dangerman. He's now beaten Peter and Dimitrenko in succession and could have easily added Povetkin to that list if he believed in himself a bit more. He was probably only one or two rounds away from beating Povetkin.

He's probably got a right to claim he's the third best heavy out there right now.

Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko

Posted: 05 Jul 2009, 06:06
by Autobarn
Eraserhead wrote:Chambers is a quality little heavyweight and a real dangerman. He's now beaten Peter and Dimitrenko in succession and could have easily added Povetkin to that list if he believed in himself a bit more. He was probably only one or two rounds away from beating Povetkin.
He's probably got a right to claim he's the third best heavy out there right now.
no way, not at all. he was well outworked by a flu ridden povetkin, who seemed to take his heart. he was probably 5 point away from winning, was chambers. chambers is a good heavyweight and povetkin beat him. it's funny hopw chambers gets credit for his wins but povetkin never got credit for beating chambers.

povetkin and dimitrenko are leagues apart. one is good, one is utterly useless.

Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko

Posted: 05 Jul 2009, 06:28
by Eraserhead
Autobarn wrote:
Eraserhead wrote:Chambers is a quality little heavyweight and a real dangerman. He's now beaten Peter and Dimitrenko in succession and could have easily added Povetkin to that list if he believed in himself a bit more. He was probably only one or two rounds away from beating Povetkin.
He's probably got a right to claim he's the third best heavy out there right now.
no way, not at all. he was well outworked by a flu ridden povetkin, who seemed to take his heart. he was probably 5 point away from winning, was chambers. chambers is a good heavyweight and povetkin beat him. it's funny hopw chambers gets credit for his wins but povetkin never got credit for beating chambers.

povetkin and dimitrenko are leagues apart. one is good, one is utterly useless.
If he's so utterly useless, why couldn't Povetkin get anywhere close to hurting or stopping him? Sure, Chambers got outworked over the stretch, but I remember him bouncing right hands off Povetkin's jaw for most of the fight. It was a very, very competitive fight.

Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko

Posted: 05 Jul 2009, 06:41
by Asterix
Eraserhead wrote:
Autobarn wrote:
Eraserhead wrote:Chambers is a quality little heavyweight and a real dangerman. He's now beaten Peter and Dimitrenko in succession and could have easily added Povetkin to that list if he believed in himself a bit more. He was probably only one or two rounds away from beating Povetkin.
He's probably got a right to claim he's the third best heavy out there right now.
no way, not at all. he was well outworked by a flu ridden povetkin, who seemed to take his heart. he was probably 5 point away from winning, was chambers. chambers is a good heavyweight and povetkin beat him. it's funny hopw chambers gets credit for his wins but povetkin never got credit for beating chambers.

povetkin and dimitrenko are leagues apart. one is good, one is utterly useless.
If he's so utterly useless, why couldn't Povetkin get anywhere close to hurting or stopping him? Sure, Chambers got outworked over the stretch, but I remember him bouncing right hands off Povetkin's jaw for most of the fight. It was a very, very competitive fight.
Er, Autobarn said Dimitrenko is useless, not Chambers.

Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko

Posted: 05 Jul 2009, 09:19
by lirva
They're all useless

Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko

Posted: 05 Jul 2009, 09:47
by Eraserhead
Asterix wrote:
Eraserhead wrote:povetkin and dimitrenko are leagues apart. one is good, one is utterly useless.
If he's so utterly useless, why couldn't Povetkin get anywhere close to hurting or stopping him? Sure, Chambers got outworked over the stretch, but I remember him bouncing right hands off Povetkin's jaw for most of the fight. It was a very, very competitive fight.
Er, Autobarn said Dimitrenko is useless, not Chambers.[/quote]

:lol: So he did. Thought he said Povetkin and Chambers. I was starting to worry.