Chambers v Dimitrenko

London Boy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39
Joined: 23 Nov 2006, 13:38

Chambers v Dimitrenko

Post by London Boy »

Anyone know if this is on sky?
brian13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1853
Joined: 07 Dec 2008, 15:01

Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko

Post by brian13 »

No but there are plenty of links to streams on the net.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko

Post by Horse »

What time does it start?
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9661
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko

Post by steve689 »

Has Chambers actually come in ripped shape this time? I heard he was 208llb.

Dimitrenko willwin a decision unless Eddie finds a way to hurt him, which is not out of the question.
Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko

Post by Asterix »

9:00
Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko

Post by Asterix »

steve689 wrote:Has Chambers actually come in ripped shape this time? I heard he was 208llb.

Dimitrenko willwin a decision unless Eddie finds a way to hurt him, which is not out of the question.
http://www.secondsout.com/world-boxing- ... in-hamburg

Chambers could very easily make cruiserweight, which is where I think he might go if he loses this fight.
Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko

Post by Dioufy »

Should be at cruiser.
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13313
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko

Post by MightyWarrior »

Anyone PM me a decent stream please? Should be around 10pm UK time, I guess..usualy is in Germany.

Dimi may have a shaky chin, but they've been careful matching him..
Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko

Post by Asterix »

My paid stream says it starts at 9 PM, so be ready then just in case. :TU:
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13313
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko

Post by MightyWarrior »

Thanks will do, you'll probably get an undercard fight first.
Watching Independence day with my kids at the moment, so may fall asleep.......
REAL_DEAL
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5030
Joined: 09 Jul 2003, 06:42

Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko

Post by REAL_DEAL »

i am watching Monshipour/moreno at the moment
Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko

Post by Asterix »

REAL_DEAL wrote:i am watching Monshipour/moreno at the moment
Are you en France? Or watching by stream?
REAL_DEAL
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5030
Joined: 09 Jul 2003, 06:42

Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko

Post by REAL_DEAL »

neither satellite.
Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko

Post by Asterix »

Cheers. Just curious.
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11806
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko

Post by Old bones Ian »

Chambers wins on points, this includes a standing count against Dimitrenko in round 7, he was also knocked down in round 10, yet british judge Paul Thomas (who i have alot of respect for) scored it 113-113. work that one out!!
Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko

Post by Asterix »

Chambers battered Dimitrenko. It wasn't close at all. I bet the punch stats look impressive. Chambers would be a force at cruiserweight. He was still a bit fleshy at 208 (or 205) lbs.
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko

Post by Autobarn »

Dimitrenko is terrible, but it's good that Chambers has been applying his talent.

113-113 - ha! will paul thomas be getting plenty more work over there, then?

not that i'm saying anything improper happened, and i don't think it's wise to 2nd guess judges all the time, but scoring a one-sided fight even is very odd. then again, maybe it's not.
Pongsaklek
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 135
Joined: 20 Sep 2008, 17:06

Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko

Post by Pongsaklek »

Autobarn wrote:Dimitrenko is terrible, but it's good that Chambers has been applying his talent.

113-113 - ha! will paul thomas be getting plenty more work over there, then?

not that i'm saying anything improper happened, and i don't think it's wise to 2nd guess judges all the time, but scoring a one-sided fight even is very odd. then again, maybe it's not.
He also had M´baye beating Kotelnik in the re, maybe he is trying to make up for that injustice. :lol:
Eraserhead
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 554
Joined: 14 Dec 2007, 18:46

Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko

Post by Eraserhead »

Chambers is a quality little heavyweight and a real dangerman. He's now beaten Peter and Dimitrenko in succession and could have easily added Povetkin to that list if he believed in himself a bit more. He was probably only one or two rounds away from beating Povetkin.

He's probably got a right to claim he's the third best heavy out there right now.
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko

Post by Autobarn »

Eraserhead wrote:Chambers is a quality little heavyweight and a real dangerman. He's now beaten Peter and Dimitrenko in succession and could have easily added Povetkin to that list if he believed in himself a bit more. He was probably only one or two rounds away from beating Povetkin.
He's probably got a right to claim he's the third best heavy out there right now.
no way, not at all. he was well outworked by a flu ridden povetkin, who seemed to take his heart. he was probably 5 point away from winning, was chambers. chambers is a good heavyweight and povetkin beat him. it's funny hopw chambers gets credit for his wins but povetkin never got credit for beating chambers.

povetkin and dimitrenko are leagues apart. one is good, one is utterly useless.
Eraserhead
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 554
Joined: 14 Dec 2007, 18:46

Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko

Post by Eraserhead »

Autobarn wrote:
Eraserhead wrote:Chambers is a quality little heavyweight and a real dangerman. He's now beaten Peter and Dimitrenko in succession and could have easily added Povetkin to that list if he believed in himself a bit more. He was probably only one or two rounds away from beating Povetkin.
He's probably got a right to claim he's the third best heavy out there right now.
no way, not at all. he was well outworked by a flu ridden povetkin, who seemed to take his heart. he was probably 5 point away from winning, was chambers. chambers is a good heavyweight and povetkin beat him. it's funny hopw chambers gets credit for his wins but povetkin never got credit for beating chambers.

povetkin and dimitrenko are leagues apart. one is good, one is utterly useless.
If he's so utterly useless, why couldn't Povetkin get anywhere close to hurting or stopping him? Sure, Chambers got outworked over the stretch, but I remember him bouncing right hands off Povetkin's jaw for most of the fight. It was a very, very competitive fight.
Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko

Post by Asterix »

Eraserhead wrote:
Autobarn wrote:
Eraserhead wrote:Chambers is a quality little heavyweight and a real dangerman. He's now beaten Peter and Dimitrenko in succession and could have easily added Povetkin to that list if he believed in himself a bit more. He was probably only one or two rounds away from beating Povetkin.
He's probably got a right to claim he's the third best heavy out there right now.
no way, not at all. he was well outworked by a flu ridden povetkin, who seemed to take his heart. he was probably 5 point away from winning, was chambers. chambers is a good heavyweight and povetkin beat him. it's funny hopw chambers gets credit for his wins but povetkin never got credit for beating chambers.

povetkin and dimitrenko are leagues apart. one is good, one is utterly useless.
If he's so utterly useless, why couldn't Povetkin get anywhere close to hurting or stopping him? Sure, Chambers got outworked over the stretch, but I remember him bouncing right hands off Povetkin's jaw for most of the fight. It was a very, very competitive fight.
Er, Autobarn said Dimitrenko is useless, not Chambers.
lirva
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko

Post by lirva »

They're all useless
Eraserhead
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 554
Joined: 14 Dec 2007, 18:46

Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko

Post by Eraserhead »

Asterix wrote:
Eraserhead wrote:povetkin and dimitrenko are leagues apart. one is good, one is utterly useless.
If he's so utterly useless, why couldn't Povetkin get anywhere close to hurting or stopping him? Sure, Chambers got outworked over the stretch, but I remember him bouncing right hands off Povetkin's jaw for most of the fight. It was a very, very competitive fight.
Er, Autobarn said Dimitrenko is useless, not Chambers.[/quote]

:lol: So he did. Thought he said Povetkin and Chambers. I was starting to worry.
Post Reply