Page 1 of 1

Re: khan V mcCloskey

Posted: 28 Jul 2009, 13:21
by mickey1975
wont happen,mate

Re: khan V mcCloskey

Posted: 28 Jul 2009, 13:56
by alexpaterson
Cant see it happening any time soon

Re: khan V mcCloskey

Posted: 28 Jul 2009, 15:44
by Cannibal
I say preference wise it will be...

1 - Hatton if he is willing.
2 - Marcos Maidana, get that mandatory out of the way.
3 - Witter if he beats Alexander
4 - Bradley/Campbell winner
5 - Some blown up lightweight
6 - Paul McCloskey

Re: khan V mcCloskey

Posted: 28 Jul 2009, 15:45
by Adamj1987
Cannibal wrote:I say preference wise it will be...

1 - Hatton if he is willing.
2 - Marcos Maidana, get that mandatory out of the way.
3 - Witter if he beats Alexander
4 - Bradley/Campbell winner
5 - Some blown up superfeather
6 - Paul McCloskey
fixed :TU:

Re: khan V mcCloskey

Posted: 29 Jul 2009, 06:58
by dbf
Cannibal wrote:I say preference wise it will be...

1 - Hatton if he is willing.
2 - Marcos Maidana, get that mandatory out of the way.
3 - Witter if he beats Alexander
4 - Bradley/Campbell winner
5 - Some blown up lightweight
6 - Paul McCloskey
Think Salita is WBA mandatory but Maidana is interim champ.

Roach has mentioned Khan v Salita on the Cotto v Pacquio undercard.

Re: khan V mcCloskey

Posted: 29 Jul 2009, 09:31
by bigjack
feargalocuinneagain wrote::box: Anybody heard news about this potential fight or am i dreaming?
I think he will end up fighting that old favourite TBA,ex super feather/non puncher/has been/never will be/was once 5 or 6 years ago but is a big name.,although i did see on the teletext on t.v that khan is being persued by 'NEW YORK DANGERMAN SALITA' :lol:

Re: khan V mcCloskey

Posted: 29 Jul 2009, 11:05
by 15829
wouldnt be shocked if it khan v morales on the cotto pac man undercard