khan V mcCloskey
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23091
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: khan V mcCloskey
wont happen,mate
-
alexpaterson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4310
- Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 11:22
Re: khan V mcCloskey
Cant see it happening any time soon
Re: khan V mcCloskey
I say preference wise it will be...
1 - Hatton if he is willing.
2 - Marcos Maidana, get that mandatory out of the way.
3 - Witter if he beats Alexander
4 - Bradley/Campbell winner
5 - Some blown up lightweight
6 - Paul McCloskey
1 - Hatton if he is willing.
2 - Marcos Maidana, get that mandatory out of the way.
3 - Witter if he beats Alexander
4 - Bradley/Campbell winner
5 - Some blown up lightweight
6 - Paul McCloskey
Re: khan V mcCloskey
fixedCannibal wrote:I say preference wise it will be...
1 - Hatton if he is willing.
2 - Marcos Maidana, get that mandatory out of the way.
3 - Witter if he beats Alexander
4 - Bradley/Campbell winner
5 - Some blown up superfeather
6 - Paul McCloskey
Re: khan V mcCloskey
Think Salita is WBA mandatory but Maidana is interim champ.Cannibal wrote:I say preference wise it will be...
1 - Hatton if he is willing.
2 - Marcos Maidana, get that mandatory out of the way.
3 - Witter if he beats Alexander
4 - Bradley/Campbell winner
5 - Some blown up lightweight
6 - Paul McCloskey
Roach has mentioned Khan v Salita on the Cotto v Pacquio undercard.
-
bigjack
- Heavyweight

Re: khan V mcCloskey
I think he will end up fighting that old favourite TBA,ex super feather/non puncher/has been/never will be/was once 5 or 6 years ago but is a big name.,although i did see on the teletext on t.v that khan is being persued by 'NEW YORK DANGERMAN SALITA'feargalocuinneagain wrote:Anybody heard news about this potential fight or am i dreaming?
Re: khan V mcCloskey
wouldnt be shocked if it khan v morales on the cotto pac man undercard