NICKY COOK V RICKY BURNS
-
THE PRINTER
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 49
- Joined: 28 Jul 2009, 16:03
NICKY COOK V RICKY BURNS
THE CLASH WILL BE STAGED AT A VENUE STILL TO BE DECIDED IN OCTOBER.....SHOULD BE A CRACKING FIGHT 
-
alexpaterson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4310
- Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 11:22
Re: NICKY COOK V RICKY BURNS
Good news should be a very tough fight I fancy Burns UD hope im right I like Ricky 
Re: NICKY COOK V RICKY BURNS
Undercard of Mitchell world title maybe?
Re: NICKY COOK V RICKY BURNS
Will this be for the British title?
-
housesecond
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 474
- Joined: 16 Nov 2008, 10:00
Re: NICKY COOK V RICKY BURNS
Very good quality match up. Makes a nice change 
Re: NICKY COOK V RICKY BURNS
dont think there is any truth in this story,recently there was a purse bid for burns/mitcvhell.this fight hasent even been confirmed,never mind a purse bid for burns/cookHorse wrote:Will this be for the British title?
-
THE PRINTER
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 49
- Joined: 28 Jul 2009, 16:03
Re: NICKY COOK V RICKY BURNS
TRUST ME MATE THE FIGHT WILL HAPPEN 8)Alba wrote:dont think there is any truth in this story,recently there was a purse bid for burns/mitcvhell.this fight hasent even been confirmed,never mind a purse bid for burns/cookHorse wrote:Will this be for the British title?
Re: NICKY COOK V RICKY BURNS
i apprciate what your saying but id be surprised,would it be world title eliminater?would it be for Brit/commonewealth belt?THE PRINTER wrote:TRUST ME MATE THE FIGHT WILL HAPPEN 8)Alba wrote:dont think there is any truth in this story,recently there was a purse bid for burns/mitcvhell.this fight hasent even been confirmed,never mind a purse bid for burns/cookHorse wrote:Will this be for the British title?
-
THE PRINTER
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 49
- Joined: 28 Jul 2009, 16:03
Re: NICKY COOK V RICKY BURNS
i think it will be for commonwealth belt.............
Re: NICKY COOK V RICKY BURNS
i think cook wins this easy 
-
sweetscience
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2816
- Joined: 22 Sep 2004, 09:09
Re: NICKY COOK V RICKY BURNS
ditto..levels and thatdazzer wrote:i think cook wins this easy
Re: NICKY COOK V RICKY BURNS
So do I because I think Burns is overrateddazzer wrote:i think cook wins this easy
Re: NICKY COOK V RICKY BURNS
Thought the purse bids were for Mitchell/Burns? I dont see the real interest in this fight even IF it does happen - Burns is overated and cook has gone as far as he can go.
A waste of time fight with no real interest for me.
Whoever wins faces Mitchell? Even more of a waste of time. Both wouldnt last beyond 5 rounds imo.
A waste of time fight with no real interest for me.
Whoever wins faces Mitchell? Even more of a waste of time. Both wouldnt last beyond 5 rounds imo.
Last edited by Des1 on 29 Jul 2009, 19:26, edited 1 time in total.
Re: NICKY COOK V RICKY BURNS
This would be a good fight. Would it be a Friday Fight Night? If so, then GREAT! That series needs to see a rise in quality.
Re: NICKY COOK V RICKY BURNS
Just dont really think burns has enough power to trouble cook and should be a clear win for cook.
Competitive fight and should go the distance but i dont see Cook losing too many rounds but not dominating enough for others to take note
Competitive fight and should go the distance but i dont see Cook losing too many rounds but not dominating enough for others to take note
Re: NICKY COOK V RICKY BURNS
If these two fight then it really should be for the British title as well as the Commonwealth.
Mitchell has not defended his British title once and he has held it for over 16 months, he should be stripped of his title.
Mitchell has not defended his British title once and he has held it for over 16 months, he should be stripped of his title.
Re: NICKY COOK V RICKY BURNS
A waste of time fight?Des1 wrote:Thought the purse bids were for Mitchell/Burns? I dont see the real interest in this fight even IF it does happen - Burns is overated and cook has gone as far as he can go.
A waste of time fight with no real interest for me.
Whoever wins faces Mitchell? Even more of a waste of time. Both wouldnt last beyond 5 rounds imo.
Who should Burns fight next instead? What about Cook?
Re: NICKY COOK V RICKY BURNS
Surely it will be for both titles?Horse wrote:If these two fight then it really should be for the British title as well as the Commonwealth.
Mitchell has not defended his British title once and he has held it for over 16 months, he should be stripped of his title.
Re: NICKY COOK V RICKY BURNS
I think this is a good match up. Similar to Brrok/Jennings. An up and coming fighter against someone who has maybe already reached his peak.
Re: NICKY COOK V RICKY BURNS
Good fight this is but I think Burns might be the fresher of the 2 and I see him out working Cookie, Good fight though and the winner fighting Mitchel would be great viewing too.. 
-
Spud
- Heavyweight

Re: NICKY COOK V RICKY BURNS
If Nicky Cook has anything left which I am sure he does - he beats Ricky Burns comfortably!!
-
DavidPayne
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 6248
- Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00
Re: NICKY COOK V RICKY BURNS
I've always believed Nicky Cook, as opposed to the many who believe Burns has been, was over-rated.
Burns could beat him over the distance.
Burns could beat him over the distance.
Re: NICKY COOK V RICKY BURNS
Coincidence that Mitchell v Martinez is on at the O2 in October, Brook v Jennings is in October and now this.
Could be a decent card that.
Could be a decent card that.
Re: NICKY COOK V RICKY BURNS
jennings v Brook would sell better up north. Cook v Burns on Mitchell undercard with Olympians on Saturday night.
Re: NICKY COOK V RICKY BURNS
Burns UD IMO