Wazzer: US Judge rules he "mislead and injured" Tyson

Post Reply
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Wazzer: US Judge rules he "mislead and injured" Tyson

Post by Autobarn »

When someone reports it, no doubt it is followed by the most important detail of all: "Warren is bitterly disputing this ruling" etc.
don't call it a comeback
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 332
Joined: 26 Apr 2004, 08:47

Re: Wazzer: US Judge rules he "mislead and injured" Tyson

Post by don't call it a comeback »

Ant Evans wrote:Yeah, if they have to balls to report it at all. Remember how BBC reported the Calzaghe ruling? Shameful.
What's happening with that? I've been away from the sites for a while and not read the trade press and coverage in the nationals has been non-existent as far as I can see.

Does anyone know of any comments from the protagonists (I'm not asking for any speculation that might be libellous, other non-libellous comment is fine) how much Calzaghe will get after the adminstrators and the banks and the taxman take their cut? Is he likely to be out of pocket for most of it? I guess the money definitely went into SN, FW admitted that. In which case, where has it gone?

If this was football or cricket or rugby the national press would be all over this...

I sympathise, I'm still owed 500 quid by Lirva33 who then went into adminstration and continued to trade under other names.
fluxstuff
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 126
Joined: 16 Nov 2008, 16:31

Re: Wazzer: US Judge rules he "mislead and injured" Tyson

Post by fluxstuff »

The SN/FWP/Calzaghe story is complicated and will not likely reach resolution soon. Calzaghe contends that FWP was having assets transferred from SN as soon as it looked like the ruling may not go their way. This is fraud of a sort if true, but as SN is technically decommissioned, then is FWP liable? Well, no - so Calzaghe has sued FW personally (or is trying), claiming that as he effectively IS the promotional company, that he was both aware and complicit in any wrong doing.

None of this has been proven but isn't unusual in these circumstances. That all said, the finding in the case with Tyson will be problematic as it may convince a judge that FW has been dishonest in prior dealings and look harshly upon him.
Rocky Balboa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1851
Joined: 24 Jan 2004, 16:38

Allegedly allegedly owes Tyson money!

Post by Rocky Balboa »

Came across this just now, not sure if this is old news to you guys, but here it is anyway!
Posted Aug. 20, 2009
By Michael Rosenthal

Mike Tyson has won a $1.2 million-plus-interest judgment in U.S. Bankruptcy Court against multiple entities, including British promoter allegedly, for money he was owed after he fought Danny Williams in 2004.

A portion of any recovery will go to the IRS to pay off Tyson’s tax debt. Tyson will receive the remainder.

Tyson was to be paid $7.2 million for the July 30, 2004 fight in Louisville, Ky. However, before the fight took place, Straight-Out Promotions – co-promoter of the fight – indicated it didn’t have enough money to pay the full amount.

To save the fight, the obligation to pay Tyson was assigned to a Gibraltar corporation called Brearly and tied to international television revenues. However, when it came time to pay up, Brearly claimed it had no obligation to make good on the debt. Warren claimed to have no connection with Brearly.

Thus, a lawsuit was filed in New York and U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Allan J. Gropper ruled in Tyson’s favor.

Gropper wrote in his ruling that Brearly was not what Warren and his promotional vehicle Sports Network purported it to be. The judge called it, “a corporate shell, with no employees, capital or business, used as a ‘façade concealing true facts.’”

Gropper wrote: “Based on the credible testimony at trial, the Court has no doubt that the UK Defendants used Brearly in the transaction to mislead and injure. In words appropriate in the boxing world, it was a perfect set-up. … Based on the evidence of record, the Court concludes that the UK Defendants used Brearly as part of a scheme or ruse to accomplish Warren’s goals: have Williams fight Tyson and possibly go on to secure a championship fight for Sports Network, while avoiding any liability to Tyson and Straight Out. Under English law, Brearly’s corporate veil must be lifted, with the result that the UK Defendants are liable for the contractual obligations that they undertook in Brearly’s name in connection with the Fight.”

Tyson was not awarded the full $1.4 million because the defendants were able to demonstrate that they accrued expenses.

Alan Kornfeld, one of the attorneys representing Tyson’s bankruptcy estate, was pleased with the decision.

“We’re very satisfied with the court’s decision,” Kornfeld said. “We wanted to hold allegedly liable and the judge held for us on that issue. Mike wasn’t paid what he was owed so steps were taken to get him what he should have been paid. We’re gratified.”

Attorneys for the defendants could not be reached.

Williams scored a fourth-round knockout over Tyson, who then was stopped in six by Kevin McBride the following year in his last fight.
don't call it a comeback
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 332
Joined: 26 Apr 2004, 08:47

Re: Wazzer: US Judge rules he "mislead and injured" Tyson

Post by don't call it a comeback »

fluxstuff wrote:The SN/FWP/Calzaghe story is complicated and will not likely reach resolution soon. Calzaghe contends that FWP was having assets transferred from SN as soon as it looked like the ruling may not go their way. This is fraud of a sort if true, but as SN is technically decommissioned, then is FWP liable? Well, no - so Calzaghe has sued FW personally (or is trying), claiming that as he effectively IS the promotional company, that he was both aware and complicit in any wrong doing.

None of this has been proven but isn't unusual in these circumstances. That all said, the finding in the case with Tyson will be problematic as it may convince a judge that FW has been dishonest in prior dealings and look harshly upon him.
Thanks - from what you are saying it sounds like there was little or nothing left in Sports Network to pay the rightful debt to Calzaghe.

Shocking.
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13114
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Wazzer: US Judge rules he "mislead and injured" Tyson

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

don't call it a comeback wrote:
I sympathise, I'm still owed 500 quid by Lirva33 who then went into adminstration and continued to trade under other names.
post of the year right there. LOL :lol:
Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: Wazzer: US Judge rules he "mislead and injured" Tyson

Post by Asterix »

Riddick Blowe wrote:
don't call it a comeback wrote:
I sympathise, I'm still owed 500 quid by Lirva33 who then went into adminstration and continued to trade under other names.
post of the year right there. LOL :lol:
:lol:
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Wazzer: US Judge rules he "mislead and injured" Tyson

Post by Autobarn »

Ant Evans wrote:TTT, as you wont find this story anywhere else...
Hence, "These damaging forums".
banjo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 26448
Joined: 20 Nov 2007, 03:17

Re: Wazzer: US Judge rules he "mislead and injured" Tyson

Post by banjo »

Hmm who is the lesser of these two evils? :lol:
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Wazzer: US Judge rules he "mislead and injured" Tyson

Post by DG. »

Asterix wrote:
Riddick Blowe wrote:
don't call it a comeback wrote:
I sympathise, I'm still owed 500 quid by Lirva33 who then went into adminstration and continued to trade under other names.
post of the year right there. LOL :lol:
:lol:
:lol:
Post Reply