Ali-Holmes documentary aired 29 years later

oliverfennell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5564
Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37

Ali-Holmes documentary aired 29 years later

Post by oliverfennell »

From the New York Times
`MUHAMMAD AND LARRY': BOXING KING CASTS HIS SHADOW, EVEN AT TIME OF DEFEAT
By MIKE HALE


The 38-year-old Muhammad Ali looms before the lens, speaking to it as if it were one of the children who came to his training camp every day to sit rapt in his presence. ``Take the film and take exactly what I'm saying,'' he tells the camera in soft, singsong tones. ``If I get whupped, play it back. Because I'll be a fool.''
He did get whupped, and 29 years later ESPN is finally playing it back. ``Muhammad and Larry,'' a documentary being shown on Tuesday night in the channel's ``30 for 30'' series, is a potent combination. It's a sad and frustrating account of Ali's pummeling at the hands of Larry Holmes in October 1980, the loss that effectively ended his career. But it's also a freshly opened time capsule, an exciting look at scenes filmed during preparations for the fight that have not been shown outside of a few festivals.
Albert and David Maysles (of ``Grey Gardens'' fame) were commissioned to document the Ali-Holmes bout, Ali's ill-advised attempt to emerge from retirement and claim the heavyweight title for the fourth time. Blending into the carnival scene, they filmed at both fighters' Pennsylvania training camps and then followed Holmes to his Easton, Pa., home.
In the aftermath of Ali's disturbing and embarrassing loss, no one wanted the short film they put together. Now Albert Maysles, the surviving brother, and Bradley Kaplan have combined the original footage with current interviews _ of Holmes and his wife, Diane; members of Ali's camp; and a group of boxing writers, but not of Ali himself _ and assembled a new, hour-long version of ``Muhammad and Larry.''
The Ali-Holmes story has taken shape over the years as a combination of mystery and Shakespearean tragedy, its key points agreed upon: the punishment Ali took from his younger sparring partners; the Mayo Clinic exam in which he had trouble touching his finger to his nose; the misguided prescription of thyroid medicine by a Nation of Islam doctor. These are all covered in the new interviews, often by the writers who codified them, including Thomas Hauser and Bert Sugar. The fight itself is shown briefly, with the wrenching scene of the trainer Angelo Dundee stepping in front of Ali and yelling at the referee, ``No, the game's over.''
But all you need to see is Ali lumbering through his workouts, stopping and starting as he tries to find his rhythm on the speed bag, to know that the fight should not have taken place. In front of the adoring crowds who came to watch him spar, he paws at the 22-year-old contender Tim Witherspoon, who in turn lands blow after blow on Ali's body.
Meanwhile Holmes, who was in the midst of a seven-year run as champion, snaps jabs and breathes easily before handfuls of fans. He's genial but matter of fact as he discusses getting into the ring with Ali, whom he had served as a sparring partner earlier in his career. The beating he would give his former boss would be cited later as a factor in Ali's development of Parkinson's disease, but listen to Holmes speaking several months before the fight:
``He just got slower and older, and it takes a little longer for him to get around now. I noticed that. He don't think as quick anymore.''
Albert Maysles has spoken of the affection he felt for both fighters, and he gives both their due. The tragedy was Ali's, born not of foolishness but of pride and a stubborn belief in himself. Overall, though, the film belongs to Holmes, the hardworking, everyday guy who happened to have a genius for hitting people. The bitterness he has long been said to feel at being overshadowed by Ali looks more like clarity.
``Ali was a great guy,'' he says today. ``But when it comes down to Ali doing his thing, he wanted to be here and you down there. As long as you stay down there, and he's up there, you're the greatest thing in the world to him.''
The best sports films tend to be about loss, even when they portray winners, and the initial documentaries in the ``30 for 30'' project _ commemorating three decades of ESPN _ have all been both entertaining and bittersweet, examining Wayne Gretzky's departure from Canada, the Colts' midnight flight from Baltimore (Barry Levinson's touching ``The Band That Wouldn't Die'') and the death of the US Football League. ``Muhammad and Larry'' maintains the series' excellent record so far. Things won't be getting cheerier: Next, on Nov. 3, is Kirk Fraser's ``Without Bias,'' about the death of the basketball star Len Bias.
Last edited by oliverfennell on 27 Oct 2009, 05:09, edited 1 time in total.
Adamj1987
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5400
Joined: 14 Oct 2008, 16:16

Re: Ali-Holmes documentary aired 29 years later

Post by Adamj1987 »

sounds good is there anyway i can watch in in the Uk do you know?
oliverfennell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5564
Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37

Re: Ali-Holmes documentary aired 29 years later

Post by oliverfennell »

Adamj1987 wrote:sounds good is there anyway i can watch in in the Uk do you know?
Don't know, but you get a version of ESPN there now, don't you? So it might be on at a later date.
Adamj1987
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5400
Joined: 14 Oct 2008, 16:16

Re: Ali-Holmes documentary aired 29 years later

Post by Adamj1987 »

oliverfennell wrote:
Adamj1987 wrote:sounds good is there anyway i can watch in in the Uk do you know?
Don't know, but you get a version of ESPN there now, don't you? So it might be on at a later date.
yea its basically somewhere between espn 2 and espn classic with less boxing
turn2stone
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 197
Joined: 21 Jan 2004, 04:40

Re: Ali-Holmes documentary aired 29 years later

Post by turn2stone »

this one snuck up on me.
here are the next 5 showings


thursday 9pm............espn2
sun (nov1) 3am.........espn2
sun (nov1) 3pm........espn2
monday (nov2)7pm.....espn2
thurs (nov5) 1030pm...espn2
ThatOne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2530
Joined: 14 Oct 2009, 17:15

Re: Ali-Holmes documentary aired 29 years later

Post by ThatOne »

oliverfennell wrote:
Adamj1987 wrote:sounds good is there anyway i can watch in in the Uk do you know?
Don't know, but you get a version of ESPN there now, don't you? So it might be on at a later date.

I couldn't believe how bad Ali looked- doing roardwork, sparring, hitting the speedbag, even talking. I can't believe his handlers took the fight but $8,000,000.00 is a lot of money. Plus in his biography whenever he needed money he would fight.

And Tim Witherspoon, his young sparring partner looked like he weighed 170 pounds.

A total fiasco ala Cammacho-Leonard. Neither Leonard or Ali could even fight back.
Adamj1987
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5400
Joined: 14 Oct 2008, 16:16

Re: Ali-Holmes documentary aired 29 years later

Post by Adamj1987 »

ThatOne wrote:
oliverfennell wrote:
Adamj1987 wrote:sounds good is there anyway i can watch in in the Uk do you know?
Don't know, but you get a version of ESPN there now, don't you? So it might be on at a later date.

I couldn't believe how bad Ali looked- doing roardwork, sparring, hitting the speedbag, even talking. I can't believe his handlers took the fight but $8,000,000.00 is a lot of money. Plus in his biography whenever he needed money he would fight.

And Tim Witherspoon, his young sparring partner looked like he weighed 170 pounds.

A total fiasco ala Cammacho-Leonard. Neither Leonard or Ali could even fight back.
it was a lot more back then and teh frugs he took to keep his appearace good had an advese affect on his body internally
turn2stone
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 197
Joined: 21 Jan 2004, 04:40

Re: Ali-Holmes documentary aired 29 years later

Post by turn2stone »

sooo many smart people were sucked in. it's amazing. i was a teenager then and sincerely believed Ali had a chance to defeat Holmes. my excuse is I was young. Alot of my dumb sentiment was based on newspaper and tv sports coverage of the time. Talking heads. I dont know how the boxing publications of the day covered the pre-fight build-up. of course, it was a different time back then with news not being reported 24/7 etc.
HomicideHenry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18722
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43

Re: Ali-Holmes documentary aired 29 years later

Post by HomicideHenry »

Not a sportswriter or fan out there truly believed Ali would lose, or if he was to lose, that it would be that brutal of a loss. Ali had a way of making people believe more about him than any other athlete in the world, and still to this day, people listen and take his words to heart like it was the gospel. It was a bad mistake. At one time it was common knowledge no one could have beaten Ali, but at that point, or at least the last 4 years he fought, it was a matter of thinking with the heart than the mind.
allworld80
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3468
Joined: 09 Dec 2006, 20:12

Re: Ali-Holmes documentary aired 29 years later

Post by allworld80 »

What a depressing watch this was. :cry:
granberry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3742
Joined: 13 Jul 2006, 11:30

Re: Ali-Holmes documentary aired 29 years later

Post by granberry »

tzyuforever wrote:What a depressing watch this was. :cry:
Depressing is the word.

Ali should not have been paid for the "fight."

He threw 5 punches in ten rounds.

And then quit in his corner (unlike the great champs in the history of boxing)

and still collected his million dollars.

What a fraud.
John Galt
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 237
Joined: 22 Jan 2008, 19:16

Re: Ali-Holmes documentary aired 29 years later

Post by John Galt »

Why does every boxing documentary have to be a tragedy? Boxers fight because it is what they do and it is where they can make the most money. At some point most boxers run into someone who is better - at least on a particular night.

Ali and his team thought he was ready, the media thought he was ready, a lot of gamblers thought he was ready. But Ali was not fighting Chuck Wepner or Leon Spinks. Holmes was arguably the best fighter Ali had ever fought. There are a lot of excuses made for why Ali was not competitive with Holmes, but it had been a lot of years since Ali would have been competitive with Larry Holmes.

If Ali had made that comeback against Wepner or Spinks, he might have won and gone on to fight for years. Ali like almost every other boxer ran into the wrong guy at the wrong time.
ThatOne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2530
Joined: 14 Oct 2009, 17:15

Re: Ali-Holmes documentary aired 29 years later

Post by ThatOne »

I guess the fact that Ali had a bruise on his brain, had trouble leaning back and touching his nose, was taking unnececcsary thyroid medicine, and couldn't hop with the agility one would expect from a man his age had no impact on the outcome.

A thirty eight year old Ali was never going to beat a prime Larry Holmes but I'm not convinced any version of Ali up to Manilla wouldn't have beat him.


I can't imagine hating somebody that much that you wouldn't take that into consideration.
turn2stone
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 197
Joined: 21 Jan 2004, 04:40

Re: Ali-Holmes documentary aired 29 years later

Post by turn2stone »

granberry wrote:
tzyuforever wrote:What a depressing watch this was. :cry:
Depressing is the word.

Ali should not have been paid for the "fight."

He threw 5 punches in ten rounds.

And then quit in his corner (unlike the great champs in the history of boxing)

and still collected his million dollars.

What a fraud.

do you really think ali was looking for an easy way out, that he was attempting to pull one over on the public. that's what fraud is. i find that line of thinking hard to buy. i find it easier to believe that going into the fight Ali was deluded with grandeur and sincerely believed he could turn back time. that it would somehow just "happen" because of who he was.
granberry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3742
Joined: 13 Jul 2006, 11:30

Re: Ali-Holmes documentary aired 29 years later

Post by granberry »

turn2stone wrote:
granberry wrote:
tzyuforever wrote:What a depressing watch this was. :cry:
Depressing is the word.

Ali should not have been paid for the "fight."

He threw 5 punches in ten rounds.

And then quit in his corner (unlike the great champs in the history of boxing)

and still collected his million dollars.

What a fraud.

do you really think ali was looking for an easy way out, that he was attempting to pull one over on the public. that's what fraud is. i find that line of thinking hard to buy. i find it easier to believe that going into the fight Ali was deluded with grandeur and sincerely believed he could turn back time. that it would somehow just "happen" because of who he was.
Actually, the Nation of Islam muslims who controlled Ali and used Ali as their mealticket made him fight.
Robinson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4415
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 22:34

Re: Ali-Holmes documentary aired 29 years later

Post by Robinson »

Every one thought Ali had it in him to beat Holmes. Near everyone, all the
experts, his people, the media and so on. That was until after the first
round was over.

Ali's tremendous self belief was not enough sadly for him. I think as Galt
said, he came back to late against the wrong guy. Same thing in some
ways happened to Holmes against Tyson, Louis against Marciano though
circumstances were different, but the result was sadly the same.
dempseyfire
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5534
Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56

Re: Ali-Holmes documentary aired 29 years later

Post by dempseyfire »

Came back against the wrong guy? Ali was already in the early stages of Parkinsons! Any top guy would've been the wrong guy. I think if Ali had been in with someone who had a real KO punch (like Mike Weaver) he would've been knocked out that night. To say all of the medical facts backing up his incredibly listless performance are just 'excuses' is granberry-style nonsense . .
Robinson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4415
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 22:34

Re: Ali-Holmes documentary aired 29 years later

Post by Robinson »

Yet he got in the ring, went through training camp, sparred publically
and campaigned as he does prior.
Parkinsons or not, he was still in shape.

It is with 20/20 hindsight that the thyroid medication explanation has
been sought, and yes the Parkinsons was and is very real no doubt.

Weaver is a nasty match up for Ali, though I doubt he would have
gotten the stoppage. Though perhaps it would have played out in
some ways like his Berbick fight, where he was more competitive,
though never the winner.

The wrong guy in the sense that he met some one who was at or
near there best, had the style to give him a run for him when he
was where he was as a great.

I am not hating on Ali, Granberry style.
ThatOne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2530
Joined: 14 Oct 2009, 17:15

Re: Ali-Holmes documentary aired 29 years later

Post by ThatOne »

Parkinsons or not, he was still in shape.


Respectfully, how can a boxer being in shape with a motor disease?
turn2stone
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 197
Joined: 21 Jan 2004, 04:40

Re: Ali-Holmes documentary aired 29 years later

Post by turn2stone »

i agree big time with dempseyfire here. there is no way Ali could have beaten anyone at this stage. it's just plain obvious from documentaries like this or Thomas Hauser's Ali biography (which delves into the medical records) that Ali was not fit to be a prize fighter. and to think he was allowed to spar, train and fight again after this is so mystifying it borders on the criminal.
turn2stone
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 197
Joined: 21 Jan 2004, 04:40

Re: Ali-Holmes documentary aired 29 years later

Post by turn2stone »

Robinson wrote:Yet he got in the ring, went through training camp, sparred publically
and campaigned as he does prior.
Parkinsons or not, he was still in shape.

It is with 20/20 hindsight that the thyroid medication explanation has
been sought, and yes the Parkinsons was and is very real no doubt.

Weaver is a nasty match up for Ali, though I doubt he would have
gotten the stoppage. Though perhaps it would have played out in
some ways like his Berbick fight, where he was more competitive,
though never the winner.

The wrong guy in the sense that he met some one who was at or
near there best, had the style to give him a run for him when he
was where he was as a great.

I am not hating on Ali, Granberry style.

i think "in shape" means he dyed his hair and lost his belly. Geez with a little Grecian Formula i could be in shape in half an hour. basically Ali "looked" in shape.
Robinson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4415
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 22:34

Re: Ali-Holmes documentary aired 29 years later

Post by Robinson »

Plenty of fighters are in shape with brain damage and
illnesses.

In shape, does not mean he was ready to fight for a
title. No doubt the parkinson hindered his reflexes (which
was evident, etc).

Why was the bout sanctioned at all, is the real question..

When was Ali diagnosed with the illness ? 1984 ?
Robinson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4415
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 22:34

Re: Ali-Holmes documentary aired 29 years later

Post by Robinson »

If we are going to use hindsight to 'diagnose' Ali with his
symptons that would suggest he had Parkinsons, we could
go back to 1976 or 77, where he was displaying some of
symptons of parkinson.
ThatOne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2530
Joined: 14 Oct 2009, 17:15

Re: Ali-Holmes documentary aired 29 years later

Post by ThatOne »

Robinson wrote:Plenty of fighters are in shape with brain damage and
illnesses.

In shape, does not mean he was ready to fight for a
title. No doubt the parkinson hindered his reflexes (which
was evident, etc).

Why was the bout sanctioned at all, is the real question..

When was Ali diagnosed with the illness ? 1984 ?
In the documentary they said test results prior to the fight showed Ali's brain scan was abnormal, he couldn't hop with the agility one would expect of a man his age, and he had problems leaning over and touching his nose.

I feel bad for Larry...Beating Ali in that condition is one of the reasons a lot of fans never embraced him.
ThatOne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2530
Joined: 14 Oct 2009, 17:15

Re: Ali-Holmes documentary aired 29 years later

Post by ThatOne »

Robinson wrote:If we are going to use hindsight to 'diagnose' Ali with his
symptons that would suggest he had Parkinsons, we could
go back to 1976 or 77, where he was displaying some of
symptons of parkinson.

According to Jose Torres who knew him fairly well he did show signs of Parkinson's Disease why he was still fighting. I'd have to go back and see when.

Oh well, greatness comes with a cost. He doesn't feel sorry for himself.

You have to take into account Parkinson's Syndrome is a progressive disease. You just don't "wake up with it".
Post Reply