Page 1 of 1
Hit and not be hit?
Posted: 11 Nov 2009, 04:42
by Grant
Don't get me wrong, I like and appreciate the bangers going around right now, But is there still room for a fammo type in the current Era? Would they survive? and who is the closest thing to an elusive hit and not be hit boxer at the highest level?
Re: Hit and not be hit?
Posted: 11 Nov 2009, 04:50
by p4p1
mayweather
Re: Hit and not be hit?
Posted: 11 Nov 2009, 05:44
by toppity
p4p1 wrote:mayweather
bingo.
Re: Hit and not be hit?
Posted: 11 Nov 2009, 15:53
by Brute
Hitting without being hit has always been the main principle of boxing. I remember watching Johnny Famechon fighting Bobby Valdez at the old Sydney Stadium. Johnny drove Valdez nuts. Every time Valdez thought he had him cornered Johnny went under Bobby's guard and left him looking at a vacant corner. Valdez was so frustrated he finished up getting disqualified for holding.
Famechon's speed and defence were incredible.
Re: Hit and not be hit?
Posted: 11 Nov 2009, 17:17
by Marlin
Re: Hit and not be hit?
Posted: 11 Nov 2009, 17:17
by Marlin
Re: Hit and not be hit?
Posted: 12 Nov 2009, 07:18
by colin russell
RJJ
Re: Hit and not be hit?
Posted: 12 Nov 2009, 07:21
by toppity
colin russell wrote:RJJ
hard not to agree
Re: Hit and not be hit?
Posted: 12 Nov 2009, 17:13
by Marlin
