I recently sent messages (with sources of reference) concerning erroneous information given on BoxRec regarding two fights of past eras (early 1900s, 1950s). I was a little surprised that neither message elicited a response from BoxRec.
That's OK, it's your site, but if you are not interested in updating/correcting the historical stuff I won't bother sending in any more observations. I was only trying to help, nothing more, nothing less.
Not interested in historical corrections?
-
Graham Houston
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 359
- Joined: 03 Jan 2008, 17:32
-
conan_the_cribber
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 8495
- Joined: 03 Jan 2005, 19:11
Re: Not interested in historical corrections?
It's all volunteer work, so don't stress out.Graham Houston wrote:I recently sent messages (with sources of reference) concerning erroneous information given on BoxRec regarding two fights of past eras (early 1900s, 1950s). I was a little surprised that neither message elicited a response from BoxRec.
That's OK, it's your site, but if you are not interested in updating/correcting the historical stuff I won't bother sending in any more observations. I was only trying to help, nothing more, nothing less.
-
informationnexus
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 157
- Joined: 25 Oct 2009, 02:08
Re: Not interested in historical corrections?
Did you post the messages here on the forum or did you send emails?
As we have a great deal to input every day, if you did not post it on the forum, I highly recommend it. Then, give it a short while and remind us if no one has updated it. But remember, first it has to be verified and that can add to the time issue.
Sincerely,
As we have a great deal to input every day, if you did not post it on the forum, I highly recommend it. Then, give it a short while and remind us if no one has updated it. But remember, first it has to be verified and that can add to the time issue.
Sincerely,