my next opponent

warmachine · Post by **warmachine** » 22 Dec 2009, 09:06

is Scott Belshaw. It will be a good fight and will be a good test for me. what do u think lads?

damianhucker1 · Post by **damianhucker1** » 22 Dec 2009, 09:08

warmachine wrote:is Scott Belshaw. It will be a good fight and will be a good test for me. what do u think lads?

good opponent , will be interesting fight from both fighters point of view , when is it and where ?

DougieC30 · Post by **DougieC30** » 22 Dec 2009, 09:09

Whos fighting

Wales · Post by **Wales** » 22 Dec 2009, 09:15

Scott posts on here sometimes. Good luck to you both. bit of a crossroads fight for you both, lose this and, well, with all due respect where do either of you go?

warmachine · Post by **warmachine** » 22 Dec 2009, 09:27

its on january 22 and its gonna be a tough fight. Definitely a crossroads fight.

DavidPayne · Post by **DavidPayne** » 22 Dec 2009, 09:30

You'll smash him to bits. 2 rounds.

Wales · Post by **Wales** » 22 Dec 2009, 09:31

Gary Sykes v Carl johannesson will be a good fight on the undercard. Hope we get to see this HW contest though, especially as Nappa will prob go 12 so time could be tight.

Wales · Post by **Wales** » 22 Dec 2009, 09:35

EDIT - highly unlikely this will be televised as the Mcallister fight is on the same night as the Napa fight and sky are showing both fights.

THEBUTCH · Post by **THEBUTCH** » 22 Dec 2009, 09:37

Should be a good fight while it lasts. Body shots will be the key.

Asterix · Post by **Asterix** » 22 Dec 2009, 09:40

Very good to hear. It's a fight I'd love to watch. I guess you'll try some hard body shots on him. Fury had great success with them.

Wales · Post by **Wales** » 22 Dec 2009, 09:41

hope so. Prefer to see this contest than Ushman Ahmeds. not sure who is on the Mcallister undercard though.

teddy007 · Post by **teddy007** » 22 Dec 2009, 09:41

warmachine wrote:is Scott Belshaw. It will be a good fight and will be a good test for me. what do u think lads?

He is terrible, the worst "prosepct" I have ever seen. No power, slow punches and absolutely no athleticism.

Poncey · Post by **Poncey** » 22 Dec 2009, 09:45

Why don't you be really honest ted and tell him what you think.

Wales · Post by **Wales** » 22 Dec 2009, 09:47

Belshaw is a "prospect"?

teddy007 · Post by **teddy007** » 22 Dec 2009, 09:48

Wales wrote:Belshaw is a "prospect"?

I should of said was.

DG. · Post by **DG.** » 22 Dec 2009, 10:25

warmachine wrote:is Scott Belshaw. It will be a good fight and will be a good test for me. what do u think lads?

Nice one!

Don't let him get going in the fight, stiff jabs and a good few body shots should send him packing!

DG. · Post by **DG.** » 22 Dec 2009, 10:27

Wales wrote:Scott posts on here sometimes. Good luck to you both. bit of a crossroads fight for you both, lose this and, well, with all due respect where do either of you go?

Are you nuts?

The British scene is wide open!

A loss does not mean too much - the manner might though.

Early days for both guys in the Pro ranks - they are not battle weary veterans.

A points loss eother way is nit the end f the world, but a KO loss????

Warmachine by KO and its a decent fight.

jBacca · Post by **jBacca** » 22 Dec 2009, 10:36

DavidPayne wrote:You'll smash him to bits. 2 rounds.

Yeah, can't argue with this prediction.

MacTavish · Post by **MacTavish** » 22 Dec 2009, 10:44

I want warmachine to smash Chisora into next week - I'd pay money to see that!

bad mamma jamma · Post by **bad mamma jamma** » 22 Dec 2009, 12:00

good on yer warmachine, for coming on here and asking for people's opinions....sometime it leaves you open for critcism...but I think Belshaw is a good opponent for you, would me a good measuring stick as other british heavyweights have fought him and beat him usually by stoppage, if you can do that and look good doing it would be good for your career...good luck man...

whiskey · Post by **whiskey** » 22 Dec 2009, 12:08

Ive only seen Belshaw twice and he was appalling i'm afraid.

He lasted barely 2 rounds with Tyson and Audrey.

Very one sided rounds I add.

Shame because he seems a great bloke and certainly looks the part in stature.

alexpaterson · Post by **alexpaterson** » 22 Dec 2009, 12:10

Good luck Larry

Belshaw is a decent test for you but i think you can get through him within the distance

Deno1986 · Post by **Deno1986** » 22 Dec 2009, 12:36

Scotty is a big 'un and as someone implied already, he is weak around the body. He looked poor in his last two bouts- a rabbit caught in headlights comes to mind but will always come out to fight and can't be underestimated. Think Larry packs a decent enough punch to trouble Scott. Best of luck Larry and to Scott if he is checking in

freddie boswell · Post by **freddie boswell** » 22 Dec 2009, 13:00

Belshaw has looked frail and seriously lacking in any real boxing ability on the 2 or 3 occasions i've seen him and as another poster pointed out looks like he does'nt take a body shot very well so I would expect an early night for larry and would not be suprised if he blasted this guy out in the 1st if he starts aggresively enough.

ALI · Post by **ALI** » 22 Dec 2009, 13:50

A left uppercut/right cross combo will put him to sleep, try it in the first round. You can come back and thank me later

my next opponent

my next opponent

Re: my next opponent

Re: my next opponent

Re: my next opponent

Re: my next opponent

Re: my next opponent

Re: my next opponent

Re: my next opponent

Re: my next opponent

Re: my next opponent

Re: my next opponent

Re: my next opponent

Re: my next opponent

Re: my next opponent

Re: my next opponent

Re: my next opponent

Re: my next opponent

Re: my next opponent

Re: my next opponent

Re: my next opponent

Re: my next opponent

Re: my next opponent

Re: my next opponent

Re: my next opponent

Re: my next opponent