Tyson's Ear Attack on Holyfield.

Post Reply

Should Tyson have been Procecuted?

Yes
6
50%
No
6
50%
 
Total votes: 12

skelp
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 199
Joined: 21 Oct 2009, 09:49

Tyson's Ear Attack on Holyfield.

Post by skelp »

I believe Tyson should have been charged with GBH for this. It amazes me to this day that he did not face criminal charges. Was it Holyfield's responsibility to press charges?

In the UK for example, Football Players have been sucessfully charged with assaults on other players, such as stamping; during matches.

Can anyone remember if Tyson was still on parole at the time?
BoxBuzz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 29847
Joined: 07 Jun 2005, 16:37

Re: Tyson's Ear Attack on Holyfield.

Post by BoxBuzz »

Hey there scalp, You asking my opinion? I think Tyson should have been prosciutto'ed. Instead it was Holyfield's ear that ended up on the menu.
MEISINGER
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Tyson's Ear Attack on Holyfield.

Post by MEISINGER »

BoxBuzz wrote:Hey there scalp, You asking my opinion? I think Tyson should have been prosciutto'ed. Instead it was Holyfield's ear that ended up on the menu.
now that was corny :OhYes:
Post Reply