Hypothetical Question....

teddy007
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1302
Joined: 22 Jan 2008, 13:44

Hypothetical Question....

Post by teddy007 »

Richard Hatton Vs Frankie Gavin after 12 pro fights and both undefeated, who wins? IMO Hatton beats him, i cannot say how because i do not no how good his chin as the moment, but Hatton looked way better.
JCB123
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 179
Joined: 11 Sep 2007, 08:09

Re: Hypothetical Question....

Post by JCB123 »

i have to say that i would agree!
15829
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3505
Joined: 05 Nov 2008, 13:26

Re: Hypothetical Question....

Post by 15829 »

if its over 6 gavin 60-54 over 8 80-72 and so on gavin is quality
teddy007
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1302
Joined: 22 Jan 2008, 13:44

Re: Hypothetical Question....

Post by teddy007 »

diggler wrote:if its over 6 gavin 60-54 over 8 80-72 and so on gavin is quality
NO F*CKING WAY. Lack of power would be the difference. Gavin is a good boxer and has great skills but him Vs Hatton would IMO be a good fight with Hatton winning over 8 to 10 rounds.
15829
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3505
Joined: 05 Nov 2008, 13:26

Re: Hypothetical Question....

Post by 15829 »

he doesn't hit the hardest but he's quick and accurate, he'd cut hatton to pieces and out box him
MrBoxingUK2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 960
Joined: 19 Nov 2009, 14:13

Re: Hypothetical Question....

Post by MrBoxingUK2 »

teddy007 wrote:
diggler wrote:if its over 6 gavin 60-54 over 8 80-72 and so on gavin is quality
NO F*CKING WAY. Lack of power would be the difference. Gavin is a good boxer and has great skills but him Vs Hatton would IMO be a good fight with Hatton winning over 8 to 10 rounds.
you dont have to be powerful to be world class
teddy007
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1302
Joined: 22 Jan 2008, 13:44

Re: Hypothetical Question....

Post by teddy007 »

MrBoxingUK2 wrote:
teddy007 wrote:
diggler wrote:if its over 6 gavin 60-54 over 8 80-72 and so on gavin is quality
NO F*CKING WAY. Lack of power would be the difference. Gavin is a good boxer and has great skills but him Vs Hatton would IMO be a good fight with Hatton winning over 8 to 10 rounds.
you dont have to be powerful to be world class
Yes you do to be truly world class. A young Hatton beats him, that I have no doubt. TBH I am not a big Hatton fan.
TerribleTerry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5272
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:30

Re: Hypothetical Question....

Post by TerribleTerry »

MrboxingUK2 wrote: you dont have to be powerful to be world class
teddy007 wrote: Yes you do to be truly world class.
Teddy you are talking shite mate.

Lay off the stella :D :shame:
lacollier883
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 210
Joined: 20 Sep 2009, 01:34

Re: Hypothetical Question....

Post by lacollier883 »

teddy007 wrote:Richard Hatton Vs Frankie Gavin after 12 pro fights and both undefeated, who wins? IMO Hatton beats him, i cannot say how because i do not no how good his chin as the moment, but Hatton looked way better.
But Frankie hasn't had 12 pro fights yet, why dont you answer this when he has, Frankie is class and will still get better with time
teddy007
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1302
Joined: 22 Jan 2008, 13:44

Re: Hypothetical Question....

Post by teddy007 »

TerribleTerry wrote:
MrboxingUK2 wrote: you dont have to be powerful to be world class
teddy007 wrote: Yes you do to be truly world class.
Teddy you are talking shite mate.

Lay off the stella :D :shame:
:lol: Rose actually, But Frankies skill is undeniable I just wanted to no what other posters would make of a macth up that no one could ever no what would happen. But I do believe you need power at world level but then again Frankie has great technique and punch selection so you never no.
teddy007
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1302
Joined: 22 Jan 2008, 13:44

Re: Hypothetical Question....

Post by teddy007 »

lacollier883 wrote:
teddy007 wrote:Richard Hatton Vs Frankie Gavin after 12 pro fights and both undefeated, who wins? IMO Hatton beats him, i cannot say how because i do not no how good his chin as the moment, but Hatton looked way better.
But Frankie hasn't had 12 pro fights yet, why dont you answer this when he has, Frankie is class and will still get better with time
I aggree totally with that. I just wanted to no people opinions on that hyperthetical question. Hatton and Gavin are totally different fighters so it would be interesting to no what people think.
JamesH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1897
Joined: 08 Aug 2008, 09:16

Re: Hypothetical Question....

Post by JamesH »

teddy007 wrote:
diggler wrote:if its over 6 gavin 60-54 over 8 80-72 and so on gavin is quality
NO F*CKING WAY. Lack of power would be the difference. Gavin is a good boxer and has great skills but him Vs Hatton would IMO be a good fight with Hatton winning over 8 to 10 rounds.
Only 2 of Hattons first 12 went the distance and what with Rickys short amateur career, Frankie would certainly have the edge in experience.. With this in mind, I think Gavin would have adopted the appropriate tactics avoiding Hatton, using his footspeed to stay out of range of Rickys preferred infighting. For me, Gavin picks him off and wins on points, but it's worth another look when he reaches 12 fights or faces more dangerous opponents...
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Hypothetical Question....

Post by whiskey »

I think It's unfair to judge really until Frankie has at least been afford 12 fights don't you think? he's only half way there.

Good question though, which i'd need to review the footage before answering.

But Frankie has changed significantly since his debut. He will change significantly more in another 6 fights time.
Deserter
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6439
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 10:01

Re: Hypothetical Question....

Post by Deserter »

I think Gavin would beat him. Watson boxed his head off at Eastlands and while Hatton appears to have improved since then I've no doubt Gavin could do a similar job. I just can't imagine Hatton being able to cut the ring off effectively as he seems very one-paced.
TerribleTerry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5272
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:30

Re: Hypothetical Question....

Post by TerribleTerry »

Deserter wrote:I think Gavin would beat him. Watson boxed his head off at Eastlands and while Hatton appears to have improved since then I've no doubt Gavin could do a similar job. I just can't imagine Hatton being able to cut the ring off effectively as he seems very one-paced.
Think you have the wrong Hatton brother there Deserter..
teddy007
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1302
Joined: 22 Jan 2008, 13:44

Re: Hypothetical Question....

Post by teddy007 »

TerribleTerry wrote:
Deserter wrote:I think Gavin would beat him. Watson boxed his head off at Eastlands and while Hatton appears to have improved since then I've no doubt Gavin could do a similar job. I just can't imagine Hatton being able to cut the ring off effectively as he seems very one-paced.
Think you have the wrong Hatton brother there Deserter..
:lol:
Deserter
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6439
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 10:01

Re: Hypothetical Question....

Post by Deserter »

teddy007 wrote:
TerribleTerry wrote:
Deserter wrote:I think Gavin would beat him. Watson boxed his head off at Eastlands and while Hatton appears to have improved since then I've no doubt Gavin could do a similar job. I just can't imagine Hatton being able to cut the ring off effectively as he seems very one-paced.
Think you have the wrong Hatton brother there Deserter..
:lol:
:oops: Doh! :lol: :lol:
Wales
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7854
Joined: 23 Mar 2004, 14:05

Re: Hypothetical Question....

Post by Wales »

Gavin will be 25 by the time he has 9 fights, by this time Ricky was headlining fighting Vince Phillips in front of 15,000 at the MEN.

A very difficult comparison to make. Gavins opposition has certainarly been better than Rickys first 9.
TerribleTerry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5272
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:30

Re: Hypothetical Question....

Post by TerribleTerry »

Wales wrote:Gavin will be 25 by the time he has 9 fights, by this time Ricky was headlining fighting Vince Phillips in front of 15,000 at the MEN.

A very difficult comparison to make. Gavins opposition has certainarly been better than Rickys first 9.
Very true. Ricky turned pro at 18 after minimal senior experience, whilst Frankie stayed in a vest and reached the pinnacle of the amateur code.
Very difficult to compare their early pro careers.
black panther
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4097
Joined: 11 Dec 2003, 07:06

Re: Hypothetical Question....

Post by black panther »

teddy007 wrote:
Yes you do to be truly world class. A young Hatton beats him, that I have no doubt. TBH I am not a big Hatton fan.

:shame:

http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_ ... &cat=boxer

http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_id=43&cat=boxer

http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_ ... &cat=boxer

:D
Wales
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7854
Joined: 23 Mar 2004, 14:05

Re: Hypothetical Question....

Post by Wales »

Barry jones truly world class ;-)

Pernell Whittaker is an exception to the rule too.
TerribleTerry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5272
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:30

Re: Hypothetical Question....

Post by TerribleTerry »

How about Colin McMillan on the domestic front?
I have little doubt that Gavin digs harder than him..
A fighter needs enough strength and power to prevent his opponent walking through his shots. I am confident that Gavin has sufficient strength and weight of shot to compete at the higher levels of the pro game
Mooresy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 402
Joined: 05 Dec 2006, 13:40

Re: Hypothetical Question....

Post by Mooresy »

black panther wrote:
teddy007 wrote:
Yes you do to be truly world class. A young Hatton beats him, that I have no doubt. TBH I am not a big Hatton fan.

:shame:

http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_ ... &cat=boxer

http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_id=43&cat=boxer

http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_ ... &cat=boxer

:D
Can't beleive you put Barrie Jones in the same league as Willie Pepp!! :lol:
TerribleTerry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5272
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:30

Re: Hypothetical Question....

Post by TerribleTerry »

Another all time great who lacked a dig:

Slapsie Maxie

http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_ ... &cat=boxer
TerribleTerry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5272
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:30

Re: Hypothetical Question....

Post by TerribleTerry »

Post Reply