George Foreman V Rocky Marciano

Who Would Win

Foreman Via KO
26
67%
Foreman Via TKO
7
18%
Foreman Via UD
0
No votes
Foreman Vis SD
0
No votes
Foreman Via MD
0
No votes
Marciano Via KO
5
13%
Marciano Via TKO
0
No votes
Marciano Via UD
1
3%
Marciano Via SD
0
No votes
Marciano Via MD
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 39

ThatOne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2530
Joined: 14 Oct 2009, 17:15

George Foreman V Rocky Marciano

Post by ThatOne »

Who Would Win?
jezzamundo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3127
Joined: 16 Jun 2004, 13:11

Re: George Foreman V Rocky Marciano

Post by jezzamundo »

I find it hard to see a case for Marciano in this one. Rocky is perhaps a little more durable than Frazier, but he never had to withstand the kind of attack than Foreman dealt out on his opponents. I say Foreman by TKO, around the 5th round. Marciano has a slim chance if he can take the fight into the late rounds.
Flump
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2702
Joined: 14 May 2006, 14:11

Re: George Foreman V Rocky Marciano

Post by Flump »

Have to see this as an inside the distance win for Big George, all depends on if Marciano can get inside Foreman's reach, stick his head on his chest and pound away, if so with his engine, heart and punch he's always got a chance but I would fancy that he'll get shelled on the way in.
Controversial
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9183
Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29

Re: George Foreman V Rocky Marciano

Post by Controversial »

Marciano way too small to stand upto Foremans power. It will be a massacre in my opinion. Marciano only knew one way to fight and that was to stand toe to toe and he tended to wear fighters down, not a great one punch finisher that many think he was (Walcott aside). He wouldn't have the chance to wear Foreman down, Foreman would batter him in under 3 rounds.
MEISINGER
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: George Foreman V Rocky Marciano

Post by MEISINGER »

marciano was not afraid to stand in there and trade blows
with anyone
but with aguy as big and strong as foreman....well i think
marciano would not only get ktfo but could of got permanently hurt
theone
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1655
Joined: 13 Sep 2005, 17:12

Re: George Foreman V Rocky Marciano

Post by theone »

Foreman quickly and brutally.
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: George Foreman V Rocky Marciano

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

The Poll options should read...

Foreman KO1
Foreman KO2
Foreman KO3


Etc...
Jaywheel
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2696
Joined: 19 Mar 2008, 12:14

Re: George Foreman V Rocky Marciano

Post by Jaywheel »

Very bad match up for Marciano.
jaclem2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 551
Joined: 09 Dec 2008, 17:42

Re: George Foreman V Rocky Marciano

Post by jaclem2 »

..marciano was physically stronger than probably every one he fought, and that was his main asset. he wouldn't have that advantage over george. foreman by a kayo, probably with a right uppercut. rocky might get up a few times though. well....maybe one time.
yancey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2827
Joined: 16 Dec 2007, 18:26

Re: George Foreman V Rocky Marciano

Post by yancey »

jezzamundo wrote:I find it hard to see a case for Marciano in this one. Rocky is perhaps a little more durable than Frazier, but he never had to withstand the kind of attack than Foreman dealt out on his opponents. I say Foreman by TKO, around the 5th round. Marciano has a slim chance if he can take the fight into the late rounds.
A little more durable than Frazier?

Puhleeeeeeeez.

I'd like to see Marciano taking the shots Frazier did in Jamaica and getting back up 6 times and on his feet at the end.
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: George Foreman V Rocky Marciano

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

As usual with Mythicals, we have two or three who vote for the guy who would never win, but don't have the courage to reveal themselves :roll:
BoxBuzz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 29847
Joined: 07 Jun 2005, 16:37

Re: George Foreman V Rocky Marciano

Post by BoxBuzz »

yancey wrote:
jezzamundo wrote:I find it hard to see a case for Marciano in this one. Rocky is perhaps a little more durable than Frazier, but he never had to withstand the kind of attack than Foreman dealt out on his opponents. I say Foreman by TKO, around the 5th round. Marciano has a slim chance if he can take the fight into the late rounds.
A little more durable than Frazier?

Puhleeeeeeeez.

I'd like to see Marciano taking the shots Frazier did in Jamaica and getting back up 6 times and on his feet at the end.

Agreed, that fight would still be going on today if the ref hadn't stopped it, same with the fight in Manilla if Eddie had not stepped in. NO QUIT in this guy. Though he was first class pro and listened to the ref and Eddie and abides their calls. Talk about a guy who could take a lickin' and keep on tickin'. I don't think Archie could have knocked him down (though that would be a great fight!), and Ezz might fight competitively with him, I don't see him getting Joe in the kind of trouble he got Rocky into.
ThatOne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2530
Joined: 14 Oct 2009, 17:15

Re: George Foreman V Rocky Marciano

Post by ThatOne »

BoxBuzz wrote:
yancey wrote:
jezzamundo wrote:I find it hard to see a case for Marciano in this one. Rocky is perhaps a little more durable than Frazier, but he never had to withstand the kind of attack than Foreman dealt out on his opponents. I say Foreman by TKO, around the 5th round. Marciano has a slim chance if he can take the fight into the late rounds.
A little more durable than Frazier?

Puhleeeeeeeez.

I'd like to see Marciano taking the shots Frazier did in Jamaica and getting back up 6 times and on his feet at the end.

Agreed, that fight would still be going on today if the ref hadn't stopped it, same with the fight in Manilla if Eddie had not stepped in. NO QUIT in this guy. Though he was first class pro and listened to the ref and Eddie and abides their calls. Talk about a guy who could take a lickin' and keep on tickin'. I don't think Archie could have knocked him down (though that would be a great fight!), and Ezz might fight competitively with him, I don't see him getting Joe in the kind of trouble he got Rocky into.


I hope that's hyperbole. He would have literally have gotten knocked out cold or perhaps killed if the ref didn't stop the fight.
big train express
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 154
Joined: 19 Jun 2006, 00:28

Re: George Foreman V Rocky Marciano

Post by big train express »

george foreman and its not even close
ThatOne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2530
Joined: 14 Oct 2009, 17:15

Re: George Foreman V Rocky Marciano

Post by ThatOne »

big train express wrote:george foreman and its not even close

I have seen people argue he would outwork Foreman.

I would like to know how he lasts long enough to outwork him; especially with Foreman's habit of just shoving around smaller opponents.
yancey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2827
Joined: 16 Dec 2007, 18:26

Re: George Foreman V Rocky Marciano

Post by yancey »

ThatOne wrote:
big train express wrote:george foreman and its not even close

I have seen people argue he would outwork Foreman.

I would like to know how he lasts long enough to outwork him; especially with Foreman's habit of just shoving around smaller opponents.

"I have seen people argue he would outwork Foreman."


I think that arguement is largely being made from the heart and not the head.

Foreman would brutalize Marciano. It might get frightening.
BoxBuzz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 29847
Joined: 07 Jun 2005, 16:37

Re: George Foreman V Rocky Marciano

Post by BoxBuzz »

ThatOne wrote:
BoxBuzz wrote:
yancey wrote: A little more durable than Frazier?

Puhleeeeeeeez.

I'd like to see Marciano taking the shots Frazier did in Jamaica and getting back up 6 times and on his feet at the end.

Agreed, that fight would still be going on today if the ref hadn't stopped it, same with the fight in Manilla if Eddie had not stepped in. NO QUIT in this guy. Though he was first class pro and listened to the ref and Eddie and abides their calls. Talk about a guy who could take a lickin' and keep on tickin'. I don't think Archie could have knocked him down (though that would be a great fight!), and Ezz might fight competitively with him, I don't see him getting Joe in the kind of trouble he got Rocky into.


I hope that's hyperbole. He would have literally have gotten knocked out cold or perhaps killed if the ref didn't stop the fight.
My point is that those guys probably saved his life. Frazier would not stop, he might die, but he wouldn't quit.
Bricks
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3916
Joined: 28 Apr 2008, 12:42

Re: George Foreman V Rocky Marciano

Post by Bricks »

i firmly beleive either the 25 year old foreman or the 42 year old foreman would have crushed marciano the older foreman may have done worse damage as his defence and size was so much more. I could see it being like the jimmy ellis fight of 1991 the first fight after the holyfield rumble.

George looked zen like in that, like some unemotional master of kung fu fighting 10 foes
raylawpc
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4871
Joined: 21 Mar 2008, 17:21

Re: George Foreman V Rocky Marciano

Post by raylawpc »

mugabi wrote:i firmly beleive either the 25 year old foreman or the 42 year old foreman would have crushed marciano the older foreman may have done worse damage as his defence and size was so much more. I could see it being like the jimmy ellis fight of 1991 the first fight after the holyfield rumble.

George looked zen like in that, like some unemotional master of kung fu fighting 10 foes
How can you possible compare Rocky Marciano to an inexperienced guy like Jimmy Ellis - who only had one opponent prior to Foreman who had ever posted a winning record?
ThatOne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2530
Joined: 14 Oct 2009, 17:15

Re: George Foreman V Rocky Marciano

Post by ThatOne »

raylawpc wrote:
mugabi wrote:i firmly beleive either the 25 year old foreman or the 42 year old foreman would have crushed marciano the older foreman may have done worse damage as his defence and size was so much more. I could see it being like the jimmy ellis fight of 1991 the first fight after the holyfield rumble.

George looked zen like in that, like some unemotional master of kung fu fighting 10 foes
How can you possible compare Rocky Marciano to an inexperienced guy like Jimmy Ellis - who only had one opponent prior to Foreman who had ever posted a winning record?

But you would agree it' s the worst of all match ups for Marciano.
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: George Foreman V Rocky Marciano

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

raylawpc wrote:
mugabi wrote:i firmly beleive either the 25 year old foreman or the 42 year old foreman would have crushed marciano the older foreman may have done worse damage as his defence and size was so much more. I could see it being like the jimmy ellis fight of 1991 the first fight after the holyfield rumble.

George looked zen like in that, like some unemotional master of kung fu fighting 10 foes
How can you possible compare Rocky Marciano to an inexperienced guy like Jimmy Ellis - who only had one opponent prior to Foreman who had ever posted a winning record?
He said it might look like that fight --- not that Marciano resembled Ellis.
raylawpc
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4871
Joined: 21 Mar 2008, 17:21

Re: George Foreman V Rocky Marciano

Post by raylawpc »

Goodnight, Irene wrote:
raylawpc wrote:
mugabi wrote:i firmly beleive either the 25 year old foreman or the 42 year old foreman would have crushed marciano the older foreman may have done worse damage as his defence and size was so much more. I could see it being like the jimmy ellis fight of 1991 the first fight after the holyfield rumble.

George looked zen like in that, like some unemotional master of kung fu fighting 10 foes
How can you possible compare Rocky Marciano to an inexperienced guy like Jimmy Ellis - who only had one opponent prior to Foreman who had ever posted a winning record?
He said it might look like that fight --- not that Marciano resembled Ellis.
Are you his spokesman? :wink: :wink:
dberry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3350
Joined: 05 Jan 2010, 02:15

Re: George Foreman V Rocky Marciano

Post by dberry »

Young George would have been to much of an animal, and old George would have been just too much. Size and power would be two of the main aspects to this victory and all through his career George had both in spades.
raylawpc
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4871
Joined: 21 Mar 2008, 17:21

Re: George Foreman V Rocky Marciano

Post by raylawpc »

ThatOne wrote:
raylawpc wrote:
mugabi wrote:i firmly beleive either the 25 year old foreman or the 42 year old foreman would have crushed marciano the older foreman may have done worse damage as his defence and size was so much more. I could see it being like the jimmy ellis fight of 1991 the first fight after the holyfield rumble.

George looked zen like in that, like some unemotional master of kung fu fighting 10 foes
How can you possible compare Rocky Marciano to an inexperienced guy like Jimmy Ellis - who only had one opponent prior to Foreman who had ever posted a winning record?

But you would agree it' s the worst of all match ups for Marciano.
Since Marciano overcame every style he faced as a professional, it hard to say what would be the "worst of all match-ups for Marciano."
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: George Foreman V Rocky Marciano

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

raylawpc wrote:
Goodnight, Irene wrote:
raylawpc wrote: How can you possible compare Rocky Marciano to an inexperienced guy like Jimmy Ellis - who only had one opponent prior to Foreman who had ever posted a winning record?
He said it might look like that fight --- not that Marciano resembled Ellis.
Are you his spokesman? :wink: :wink:
Wasn't being rude, & perhaps you interpreted right, for all I know. Just saying this much --- going by what he said, regardless of what he may've meant, he didn't compare Marciano to Ellis.
Post Reply