Page 1 of 2

30 or 40?

Posted: 16 Mar 2010, 17:31
by allworld80
Should we stop the current season at 30 weeks? It seems to be losing some steam.

I also may be inclined to stay on for another season if a replacement can't be found.

Re: 30 or 40?

Posted: 16 Mar 2010, 17:31
by Adamj1987
40

Re: 30 or 40?

Posted: 16 Mar 2010, 18:22
by madball1982
I'm not fussed. I wouldn't mind starting a new season after 30......but that could be coz my fighters aren't going very far this season. :(

Re: 30 or 40?

Posted: 16 Mar 2010, 18:34
by jBacca
30 please, but would stay till the end regardless.

Sav killed the season :OhYes:

Re: 30 or 40?

Posted: 16 Mar 2010, 18:40
by SAV
jBacca wrote:30 please, but would stay till the end regardless.

Sav killed the season :OhYes:
sav made the season noob.

Re: 30 or 40?

Posted: 16 Mar 2010, 18:43
by jBacca
Don't noob me, noob.

Re: 30 or 40?

Posted: 16 Mar 2010, 18:44
by Fist of Legend
35

Re: 30 or 40?

Posted: 16 Mar 2010, 18:45
by SAV
jBacca wrote:Don't noob me, noob.
i understand you're mad. i mean who wouldnt be with 2 .500 fighters. but thats no reason to step out of order and call the king of this season a noob. greb fought tjf when he was past his prime. we said after we beat spinks we're past it and dont really care what happens form this point on. the legacy is secure.

Re: 30 or 40?

Posted: 16 Mar 2010, 18:46
by SAV
Fist of Legend wrote:35
32.8

Re: 30 or 40?

Posted: 16 Mar 2010, 18:50
by jBacca
SAV wrote:
jBacca wrote:Don't noob me, noob.
i understand you're mad. i mean who wouldnt be with 2 .500 fighters. but thats no reason to step out of order and call the king of this season a noob. greb fought tjf when he was past his prime. we said after we beat spinks we're past it and dont really care what happens form this point on. the legacy is secure.
I don't really care about all that.

noob.

Re: 30 or 40?

Posted: 16 Mar 2010, 19:06
by SAV
you have to say that. :OhYes:

Re: 30 or 40?

Posted: 16 Mar 2010, 19:12
by toppity
Image

Re: 30 or 40?

Posted: 16 Mar 2010, 19:36
by Crease
If asked, I would plump for 40 weeks... It is only another 15 fights until the finish and it would give fighters more time...

The likes of Joe Calzaghe, Maxie Rosenbloom, Tommy Gibbons, Tommy Loughran and Roy Jones Junior could all potentially have title runs...

Besides boxers such as mine and Deno's have only settled into the brs, I believe we should be given a little more time...

If we are going to end the season in week 20 (5 more fights) then it is very little time to achieve anything and things will not change that much.
In fact, we could just finish it after these fights if that wre the case.

Re: LHW SEASON WEEK 22 MATCHUPS

Posted: 16 Mar 2010, 19:44
by kevo
40! Gotta give greb a chance to win the titles and establish a legacy of his own. To cut him off in his Simprime would be the biggest injustice in the history of BRS!

Re: 30 or 40?

Posted: 16 Mar 2010, 20:16
by Neri
Plenty of juice left in the season. I say 40.

Re: 30 or 40?

Posted: 16 Mar 2010, 21:33
by 'Frilla
Neri wrote:Plenty of juice left in the season. I say 40.
agreed,
getting beat for 15 more weeks wont kill me :lol:

Re: LHW SEASON WEEK 22 MATCHUPS

Posted: 17 Mar 2010, 13:04
by sockdolager
kevo wrote:40! Gotta give greb a chance to win the titles and establish a legacy of his own. To cut him off in his Simprime would be the biggest injustice in the history of BRS!
Sounds familiar.... hmmmm.... Yep, sounds very very familiar.

Cut it off commish!

We need another manager wondering what could have been besides me!!!

:lol:

Re: LHW SEASON WEEK 22 MATCHUPS

Posted: 17 Mar 2010, 13:06
by kevo
sockdolager wrote:
kevo wrote:40! Gotta give greb a chance to win the titles and establish a legacy of his own. To cut him off in his Simprime would be the biggest injustice in the history of BRS!
Sounds familiar.... hmmmm.... Yep, sounds very very familiar.

Cut it off commish!

We need another manager wondering what could have been besides me!!!

:lol:
Not cool socko, not cool

:witzend:

Re: 30 or 40?

Posted: 17 Mar 2010, 13:14
by jBacca
Crease wrote:If asked, I would plump for 40 weeks... It is only another 15 fights until the finish and it would give fighters more time...

The likes of Joe Calzaghe, Maxie Rosenbloom, Tommy Gibbons, Tommy Loughran and Roy Jones Junior could all potentially have title runs...

Besides boxers such as mine and Deno's have only settled into the brs, I believe we should be given a little more time...

If we are going to end the season in week 20 (5 more fights) then it is very little time to achieve anything and things will not change that much.
In fact, we could just finish it after these fights if that wre the case.
Just to be clear Creasenoob, you and Deno's fighters are shit and you won't win anything. Not being harsh, it's just the reality of it all.

Re: LHW SEASON WEEK 22 MATCHUPS

Posted: 17 Mar 2010, 13:26
by sockdolager
kevo wrote:
sockdolager wrote:
kevo wrote:40! Gotta give greb a chance to win the titles and establish a legacy of his own. To cut him off in his Simprime would be the biggest injustice in the history of BRS!
Sounds familiar.... hmmmm.... Yep, sounds very very familiar.

Cut it off commish!

We need another manager wondering what could have been besides me!!!

:lol:
Not cool socko, not cool

:witzend:
:D

Re: 30 or 40?

Posted: 17 Mar 2010, 20:27
by BoxBuzz
Maxie is the champ, what else is there? Might as well wrap it up right now.

Re: 30 or 40?

Posted: 18 Mar 2010, 00:41
by Crease
BoxBuzz wrote:Maxie is the champ, what else is there? Might as well wrap it up right now.
In fairness, if Rosenbloom can win the titles, than Gibbons and Loughran and Charles and Calzaghe and Jones JR are all in with decent shouts...

Not to mention the fact that Michael Spinks has his title shot this week...

(It's a good thing TJF didn't win this week, or I reckon he would've been no 1 contender). :lol:

Re: 30 or 40?

Posted: 18 Mar 2010, 00:57
by Crease
jBacca wrote: Just to be clear Crease, you and Deno's fighters are poop and you won't win anything.
I wouldn't disagree with you about Deno's fighters... Frankly, when he chose his fighters (around the same time that I chose mine)...
I was surprised at his choices, because frankly there were better fighters to chose from. :box:

But my boxers have done well in the brs... Granted, they both have blemishes on their records, but they are 2 pretty decent boxers...

Froch lost to Benn
The Benn fight was prickly close... Despite Froch flooring him in the eighth round.
Froch only lost by 1 point is ALL of the judges scorecards, so it was hardly an easy fight for Nigel.

Froch drew with Eubank
The fight could not have been closer.1 judge had the fight to either boxer and the last judge had the fight as a draw.
A single point either way would have won the match.

Froch lost to Calzaghe
But his was throughly beaten, Joe was more skilled and the number of rounds passed by as Joe kept scoring 10.

Froch lost to Conn
This was a SCANDAL! After 8 rounds of boxing, Conn's cut worsened...
He was unable to continue, yet the fight was awarded to him... :shame:
What a crock. :shame:

Re: 30 or 40?

Posted: 18 Mar 2010, 01:25
by 'Frilla
grip it

Re: 30 or 40?

Posted: 18 Mar 2010, 01:26
by 'Frilla
and flip it :>
:o