Page 1 of 1
get your records sorted
Posted: 11 Oct 2003, 18:18
by eastmountpicko
sort yourself out boxrec. matthew barney beat tony oakey.
Posted: 11 Oct 2003, 18:30
by kevin
I think they took the results from
http://www.allegedly.tv look at the unofficial Wayne Elcock card . 120-108 to Oakey! ??
Kevin
http:///www.britishboxing.net
Posted: 11 Oct 2003, 18:34
by Grey
Posted: 11 Oct 2003, 18:36
by Grey
What the heck were the offical scores anyways? I can't find anything.
Posted: 11 Oct 2003, 18:53
by REAL_DEAL
Barney won 116-111 on Reg Thompson's scorecard, 114-113 on Carl Rogers while Tony Walker had it 114-113.
Posted: 11 Oct 2003, 18:55
by Grey
Ok ... so it was a split decision, not a majority decision.
Posted: 11 Oct 2003, 19:00
by REAL_DEAL
no majority decision, its the wbu rule thing,
stupid rule really
Posted: 11 Oct 2003, 19:01
by Grey
how it is a majority decision?
the WBU rules are dumb.
Posted: 11 Oct 2003, 19:02
by REAL_DEAL
dont know thats what the MC said,
"according to the wbu rules we have a MD"
the wbu have to be different
Posted: 11 Oct 2003, 22:02
by Zhuge
I'm surprised by this. Did Oakey look that bad, or was Barney better than expected?
Posted: 12 Oct 2003, 00:42
by Twinkle Toes
It was a diabolical fight, with Barney incorporating a jab, and grab technique, and Oakey incorporating a being jabbed, and being grabbed technique.
Poor fight. No rematch please.
Posted: 12 Oct 2003, 13:16
by Loynesy
Agree with Twinkle Toes, a perfect example of styles NOT making fights. Oakey threw haybalers which were missing by a mile, Barney countered but not very effectively.
Its a shame because both have something to offer the sport, just not in the same ting.
