get your records sorted

eastmountpicko · Post by **eastmountpicko** » 11 Oct 2003, 18:18

sort yourself out boxrec. matthew barney beat tony oakey.

kevin · Post by **kevin** » 11 Oct 2003, 18:30

I think they took the results from http://www.allegedly.tv look at the unofficial Wayne Elcock card . 120-108 to Oakey! ??

Kevin
http:///www.britishboxing.net

Grey · Post by **Grey** » 11 Oct 2003, 18:34

STUPID WAYNE ELCOCK

Last time I ever use his scoring and that damn webcam for help.

Grey · Post by **Grey** » 11 Oct 2003, 18:36

What the heck were the offical scores anyways? I can't find anything.

REAL_DEAL · Post by **REAL_DEAL** » 11 Oct 2003, 18:53

Barney won 116-111 on Reg Thompson's scorecard, 114-113 on Carl Rogers while Tony Walker had it 114-113.

Grey · Post by **Grey** » 11 Oct 2003, 18:55

Ok ... so it was a split decision, not a majority decision.

REAL_DEAL · Post by **REAL_DEAL** » 11 Oct 2003, 19:00

no majority decision, its the wbu rule thing,

stupid rule really

Grey · Post by **Grey** » 11 Oct 2003, 19:01

how it is a majority decision?
the WBU rules are dumb.

REAL_DEAL · Post by **REAL_DEAL** » 11 Oct 2003, 19:02

dont know thats what the MC said,

"according to the wbu rules we have a MD"

the wbu have to be different

Zhuge · Post by **Zhuge** » 11 Oct 2003, 22:02

I'm surprised by this. Did Oakey look that bad, or was Barney better than expected?

Twinkle Toes · Post by **Twinkle Toes** » 12 Oct 2003, 00:42

It was a diabolical fight, with Barney incorporating a jab, and grab technique, and Oakey incorporating a being jabbed, and being grabbed technique.

Poor fight. No rematch please.

Loynesy · Post by **Loynesy** » 12 Oct 2003, 13:16

Agree with Twinkle Toes, a perfect example of styles NOT making fights. Oakey threw haybalers which were missing by a mile, Barney countered but not very effectively.

Its a shame because both have something to offer the sport, just not in the same ting.