Mike McCallum record corrections

Post Reply
pugilisticspecialist
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 252
Joined: 19 May 2009, 16:23

Mike McCallum record corrections

Post by pugilisticspecialist »

vs. Shelby Wilkerson - listed at middleweight but was actually at light middleweight (fighters came in at 151 lbs and 154 lbs)

vs. Ed Harris - was actually at light middleweight (both boxers came in at 150 lbs)

vs. Kevin Perry - was actually at middleweight (fighters came in at 155 and 156 lbs)

vs. Jimmy Shavers - was actually at super middleweight (fighters came in at 163 and 166 lbs)

vs. Irving Hines - was actually at super middleweight (McCallum came in at 162 lbs)

vs. Leroy Hester - was actually at super middleweight (McCallum came in at 165 lbs)

vs. David McCluskey - was actually at super middleweight (fighters came in at 168 and 162 1/2 lbs)

vs. Ramzi Hassan - was actually at cruiserweight (fighters came in at 180 and 179 lbs)

:TU:
computerrank
Editor
Editor
Posts: 2492
Joined: 04 Jan 2003, 18:59

Re: Mike McCallum record corrections

Post by computerrank »

@pugilisticspecialist

vs. Shelby Wilkerson - listed at middleweight but was actually at light middleweight (fighters came in at 151 lbs and 154 lbs) :TU:

vs. Ed Harris - was actually at light middleweight (both boxers came in at 150 lbs) :TU:

vs. Kevin Perry - was actually at middleweight (fighters came in at 155 and 156 lbs) - both light middleweights at that time

vs. Jimmy Shavers - was actually at super middleweight (fighters came in at 163 and 166 lbs) :TU:

vs. Irving Hines - was actually at super middleweight (McCallum came in at 162 lbs) - only 1 weight known - no bout division assigned

vs. Leroy Hester - was actually at super middleweight (McCallum came in at 165 lbs) - only 1 weight known

vs. David McCluskey - was actually at super middleweight (fighters came in at 168 and 162 1/2 lbs) :TU:

vs. Ramzi Hassan - was actually at cruiserweight (fighters came in at 180 and 179 lbs) - both light heavyweights at that time
pugilisticspecialist
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 252
Joined: 19 May 2009, 16:23

Re: Mike McCallum record corrections

Post by pugilisticspecialist »

Are these corrections not going to be made? It took me ages to find them all. :(
computerrank
Editor
Editor
Posts: 2492
Joined: 04 Jan 2003, 18:59

Re: Mike McCallum record corrections

Post by computerrank »

pugilisticspecialist wrote:Are these corrections not going to be made? It took me ages to find them all. :(
the changes were made, but will be up within 10 days latest :TU:
Post Reply