Paul McCloskey Vs Amir Khan

Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Paul McCloskey Vs Amir Khan

Post by Final round »

I'd prefer this to Peterson, It would be a good contrast of styles and McCloskey would be well up for it.
billy nelson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1966
Joined: 12 Apr 2010, 12:49

Re: Paul McCloskey Vs Amir Khan

Post by billy nelson »

Amir v Paul would be a classic and one i think Amir may struggle in,styles make fights
djmartymac
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 37
Joined: 08 Mar 2008, 10:32

Re: Paul McCloskey Vs Amir Khan

Post by djmartymac »

Bennyblanco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 967
Joined: 19 Jul 2009, 05:01

Re: Paul McCloskey Vs Amir Khan

Post by Bennyblanco »

Khan put on twitter yesterday that Peterson was overpricing himself. Would rather see this anyway :TU:
sharpei_louis
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 644
Joined: 22 Nov 2007, 08:30

Re: Paul McCloskey Vs Amir Khan

Post by sharpei_louis »

No chance of this fight being made IMO. McCloskey is a relative unknown in the US, where Khan is hoping to make a name for himself.
Newport Daz
Cruiserweight
Posts: 687
Joined: 31 Aug 2010, 07:26

Re: Paul McCloskey Vs Amir Khan

Post by Newport Daz »

sharpei_louis wrote:No chance of this fight being made IMO. McCloskey is a relative unknown in the US, where Khan is hoping to make a name for himself.
Yeah, imagine Sky bumping Wlad Vs Haye for this fight.That would be absolutly scandalous.
djmartymac
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 37
Joined: 08 Mar 2008, 10:32

Re: Paul McCloskey Vs Amir Khan

Post by djmartymac »

Khan confirmed on Five live tonight that he wants the fight. So hopefully it can be made :box:
sharpei_louis
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 644
Joined: 22 Nov 2007, 08:30

Re: Paul McCloskey Vs Amir Khan

Post by sharpei_louis »

djmartymac wrote:Khan confirmed on Five live tonight that he wants the fight. So hopefully it can be made :box:

Did Khan put McCloskey's name forward, or did the interviewer mention it and Khan say that it was a fight he would welcome? Cause they are two totally different things. Khan will be after the winner of Alexander/Bradley, surely.
bfchunk
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 884
Joined: 28 Sep 2009, 15:39

Re: Paul McCloskey Vs Amir Khan

Post by bfchunk »

Khan, McCloskey and Sky would all be happy with this. HBO no way - and that would be the decider
dazzer
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 280
Joined: 11 Apr 2009, 17:07

Re: Paul McCloskey Vs Amir Khan

Post by dazzer »

I like this fight McCloskey could be a very tricky customer for Khan.
slapbangwhallop
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2031
Joined: 13 Dec 2010, 08:27

Re: Paul McCloskey Vs Amir Khan

Post by slapbangwhallop »

HBO seemingly the only stumbling block at the moment.
NazNaci1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4511
Joined: 26 Mar 2009, 00:58

Re: Paul McCloskey Vs Amir Khan

Post by NazNaci1 »

A good match, and as someone said it would be more entertaining that Khan - Peterson.

We can only hope this match can be made.
iamasadlittleboy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1877
Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 13:05

Re: Paul McCloskey Vs Amir Khan

Post by iamasadlittleboy »

I like it, loving the fact the yanks on other forums haven't got a clue about the guy
UpperCrust
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 82
Joined: 03 Apr 2010, 06:34

Re: Paul McCloskey Vs Amir Khan

Post by UpperCrust »

sharpei_louis wrote:
djmartymac wrote:Khan confirmed on Five live tonight that he wants the fight. So hopefully it can be made :box:

Did Khan put McCloskey's name forward, or did the interviewer mention it and Khan say that it was a fight he would welcome? Cause they are two totally different things. Khan will be after the winner of Alexander/Bradley, surely.
Khan will fight the winner of these two after this in July(ish) I would imagine and, almost certainly, in America.

He wanted one in the UK first with a name known to UK fight fans (Katsidis was mooted) and thus McCloskey fits the bill.
boxerbob
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1041
Joined: 30 Oct 2005, 18:11

Re: Paul McCloskey Vs Amir Khan

Post by boxerbob »

sky surely wont put this as a ppv , it does not merit a ppv fight

sky chose khan over a haye vs klitschko fight and now it looks like hes fighting a guy who isnt even world class

WELL DONE SKY im sure you will charge 14.95 for this and im sure yiu will get very very very low ppv numbers

A CRAZY DECISION
NazNaci1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4511
Joined: 26 Mar 2009, 00:58

Re: Paul McCloskey Vs Amir Khan

Post by NazNaci1 »

You can guarantee it will be PPV and there still will be ads in between rounds :roll:

Not that I ever pay for SKY events.
mjl78
Cruiserweight
Posts: 33
Joined: 14 Jan 2011, 04:22

Re: Paul McCloskey Vs Amir Khan

Post by mjl78 »

this by no means an easy fight for khan if it goes ahead. although it's big step up for mccloskey if khan takes it too lightly mccloskey definitely has the beating of him. I have seen mccloskey live 5 or 6 times and even in the early days when he was fighting down the bill he stood as being a top class fighter. He tends to fight with his guard down too much which would be suicide against someone with the speed of khan. however he is a very quick, stylish fighter himself.

he also takes a good punch and seems to have developed more power in his last few fights ending them all inside the distance (don't be deceived by the 12 stoppages out of 22 fights record amir!). anyone who saw mccloskey's knock out of Giuseppe Lauri will know that he can punch (although this was actually one his worst performances)
whiteboy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 540
Joined: 07 Mar 2008, 19:48

Re: Paul McCloskey Vs Amir Khan

Post by whiteboy »

potentially a good matchup, probably adds a couple of thousand onto the gate too
Ketchel
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 867
Joined: 17 Nov 2008, 14:18

Re: Paul McCloskey Vs Amir Khan

Post by Ketchel »

I work with a guy who is related to McCloskey and he told me about this this morning. They are very excited about this fight and Paul fancies his chances.

As previously mention Paul has the dig to hurt Khan. I can see him causing Khan trouble with his uppercut (Naz style) if Khan goes looking for him.
Black Sam Bellamy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1476
Joined: 25 Sep 2008, 13:51

Re: Paul McCloskey Vs Amir Khan

Post by Black Sam Bellamy »

A potentially good contest. I have been impressed with Paul McCloskey, without really knowing how good he could be.

Given Khan's promotional arrangements, it's hard to see how they could build a decent undercard to support a PPV though, if the fight was to take place in the UK ?
bennie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15244
Joined: 15 Nov 2002, 09:53

Re: Paul McCloskey Vs Amir Khan

Post by bennie »

Talk is that Amir Khan - the twit who Twits - may now defend his WBA light-welterweight title against Ireland's unheralded Paul McCloskey here on April 16.
Khan was lined up to defend on the night against Lamont Peterson, a solid American with plenty of balls, but Peterson wants a ton of money after years of poverty, so Khan and his team are considering McCloskey, a strong, clever southpaw from Dungiven in Northern Ireland unbeaten in 22 fights.
McCloskey holds the European light-welterweight belt and is currently training to defend against Italy's Michele Di Rocco in Belfast on March 5. He can fight and he is ready to fight but his last four opponents read Dean Harrison, Barry Morrison, Giuseppe Lauri and Daniel Rasilla, and you read Dmitriy Salita, Paulie Malignaggi, Marcos Maidana and Andreas Kotelnik for Khan. Oh! A longer look at their records tells you that the temperamental Colin Lynes is the best man McCloskey has beaten as a pro; Khan holds a win over Marco Antonio Barrera.
People forget also that, for all his amateur exploits, McCloskey failed to make the Athens Olympics in 2004 where Khan made his name with a glittering silver medal at the tender age of 17. Still only 24, Khan is a whopping seven years younger than the McCloskey and much stronger at the weight than the burly challenger, who struggles to boil down to 10 stone.
All in all, McCloskey cannot compare to Khan, who has improved immensely over the last 18 months and makes his first appearance here since blasting the previously unbeaten Salita in 76 seconds in Newcastle in 2009. We can expect the homecoming Bolton boy to prevail in seven or eight rounds this time.
Last edited by bennie on 14 Jan 2011, 06:22, edited 1 time in total.
slapbangwhallop
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2031
Joined: 13 Dec 2010, 08:27

Re: Paul McCloskey Vs Amir Khan

Post by slapbangwhallop »

boxerbob wrote:sky surely wont put this as a ppv , it does not merit a ppv fight

sky chose khan over a haye vs klitschko fight and now it looks like hes fighting a guy who isnt even world class

WELL DONE SKY im sure you will charge 14.95 for this and im sure yiu will get very very very low ppv numbers

A CRAZY DECISION
Wasnt Oisin Fagan v Amir Khan PPV!? If thats the benchmark...........
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23064
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Paul McCloskey Vs Amir Khan

Post by mickey1975 »

whiteboy wrote:potentially a good matchup, probably adds a couple of thousand onto the gate too
More than that,mate.McCloskey has a good following and there are a lot of Irish in Manchester.I would guess McCloskey would have greater.or certainly louder support on the night.
doctorboxing
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 951
Joined: 14 Aug 2008, 11:23

Re: Paul McCloskey Vs Amir Khan

Post by doctorboxing »

slapbangwhallop wrote:
Wasnt Oisin Fagan v Amir Khan PPV!? If thats the benchmark...........
Yeah that was ridiculous but at least De La Hoya Pacman was included in the package.

As much as I think this would be a good fight for Khan and a good watch, there is no way in hell I would pay £15 for this unless there was a stacked undercard
Post Reply